Posted on 01/03/2008 9:07:11 PM PST by nwrep
Did the weakest Dem candidate for the general election won tonight? I think so.
By sending forth Hussein Osama out of Iowa, Democrats have unwittingly weakened their general election prospects.
Hussein's exotic mixture of radical liberalism, Kwanzaa Socialism, antipathy towards the unborn, and weakness against his jihadi brethren will all come back to destroy him against almost any Republican opponent, even the snake-grope from Hope.
I think we as Republicans should be celebrating tonight at the coronation of Hussein, in whose presence millions of Democrat women, from elementary school teachers to journalism majors to law school grads to dykes on bikes will go weak in their knees.
As defenders of this great Republic, and of the pinnacle of Western civilization that it represents, we should all come together tonight and agree on a common strategy that will keep the White House from becoming a madrassa.
God Bless America, Land of the Free.
Rush live on FOX right now.
No one has as big of negatives in national polling as Hillary; Obama’s not our weakest opponent, and no, someone from Hope would not be able to crush him. A side by side election will likely favor the novelty over the preacher.
It depends on who the Republican nominee is.
Obama is exactly what the dems want. The general will pit the GOP against a far-left candidate. There should be a lot of cross-over dems by then.
Obama has an appeal. His problems begin when his liberal ideas become highlighted.
Come on, what the heck is his appeal? Please enlighten me.
I’ll repeat again. I hate to see Obama win because if we got a RINO nobody would elect I don’t want us to get stuck with ...
“President Obama” ...
Yes, I consider him worse than Edwards or Hillary ...
No. He is the best general election candidate on their side and we will very likely lose to him. I’m gonna make a ton of cash on intrade in the process but it’s sad.
Many people on this site are enjoying attacking other Republicans. Good. Enjoy the years of Obama, you’re asking for it.
Hillary will savage Obama in the following primary contests. That will be ammunition the Republican candidate can use against Obama, and it will be guilt-free since Hillary brought it up first.
Hillary, otoh, is a known entity and many people don't like what they see.
Well, a third place finish in Iowa’s great for Hillary’s cash pot; she’ll be able to tap a lot of held money, especially from Southern democrats. An Edwards third place would have been good enough, it’d keep him rolling towards South Carolina, but this second place finish will likely burn him more than it helps. First place Obama win will cause many of his supporters to believe he’s ordained to victory while they’ll get one heck of a surprise in New Hampshire.
The lurch to the left that Hillary will have to take after this won’t do her any favors come the general election either. Honestly, though, I think you’re looking at a brokered convention at this point for the Rats, especially as I think Richardson will be the spoiler who will leave it open. And an open convention is the Rats worst nightmare.
He doesn’t appeal to me but it is not unlike the Huckabee, Edwards appeal. It starts with pretty stories and casting yourself as the ally of the common man against the great big mean world.
Why?
I agree some liberals will and do find him appealing. But conservative independents and Republicans will be turned off by him. We should be able to paint him as a far left candidate.
Obama’s “appeal” is generated by the MSM. Listening to all the talking heads tonight, one would assume Iowa represents the entire US, and the entire US wants C H A N G E.
Someone please tell these people Pres Bush is not running this time.
Jeez!
Hussein is a novelty, but he is not qualified to lead a bowling team.
The Dems could Run William Jefferson and beat Huckabee.
He scares me—maybe as much as Herself does.
Mrs. Obama is a liability that will begin to be exploited by the Clintons.
He is the rats strongest candidate.
Most diehard Republicans I know say they could at least stomach seeing Obama on TV for the next 4 years. OTOH, the thought of Hillary's grating voice, her plastic affect, and the general sliminess of Her Highness makes even the most lukewarm Republican want to crawl across ground glass to vote against her (with a few notable exceptions, mostly found on this website, who seem to think that a Hillary would "teach the Republicans a lesson").
I disagree, Huck would be a strong candidate. He would do best against Obama, then Hillary. Edwards would do best against him.
-PJ
What did he say?
(Unless the Republicans hand the Presidency to them on a silver platter, like they handed Congress to the Democrats in 2004.) (Don't put it past them.)
Obama is the most attractive candidate (by far), both personally and politically, but the electorate is going to consider him too naive, a babe in the woods, rather sweet but hardly someone to whom they would entrust the future of their children or the U.S.A.
Television is not kind to John Edwards or Hillary Clinton. Edwards is no doubt effective in a courtroom, but the television camera is far too revealing.
Huckabee, on the other hand, is a master of communication, including television, that John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan might envy. The television camera loves him.
It loves Romney too. It insists that he is a straight shooter--that you can believe what he says--and that he is a tower of strength, moral, physical, and intellectual, on which you can always depend.
Giuliani does well on TV too. It insists that he is a savvy, experienced sophisticate, who's been everywhere and seen everything--including 9/11--and can handle anything--including suicidal terrorists and decadent (and suicidal) "Liberals".
Unfortunately (for them) the Democrats are running against George W. Bush, and he's not a candidate. Against any likely Republican nominee, the three Democrat frontrunners don't stand a chance.
The Republicans are going to win the White House and both houses of Congress in November.
(Unless they decide to commit political suicide.)
(Don't put that past them.)
(Remember the Panama Canal giveaway? Prescription drug benefits as a new entitlement? The present Bush Administration--spending more money than any President since Lyndon Johnson? Open Borders? Amnesty for Illegal Aliens? Refusal to enforce America's immigration laws?)
(Don't put anything past the Republicans!)
(Especially snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory!)
Huckabee... I have no words for Huckabee, other than, who in their right mind, and with any, erm, mind, would, *ever*, would vote for him after that foreign policy 4-th grader paper he issued ? Not even going to touch all the taxing, and pardoning, and government-expanding, and ‘preacher-in-chief’ stuff.
Why can’t Iowans tell that he’s a Muslim terrorist sympathizer? Even libs can’t be this stupid!
Obama will be harder to beat than Hillary. If Thompson or McCain is the Rep nominee, it will be quite a contrast in ages. Obama could get more young people to vote, which could have an impact in key states.
I'm not really aware of that. What did she do? In any case, if they realize that she is a liability, they probably will hide her for a while.
You’ve *got* to be joking ? You *honestly* believe a guy who once said that women should submit to their husbands could actually get elected in the general ? The MSM would play that stuff on an infinite loop. (Not to mention it bugs me almost more than his expansion of the AK govm’t from 1B to 6B/year). Yea. That’s 6x. And you can’t tell me he grew the economy in AK by a factor of 6.
he’s the strongest. laura ingraham summed it up, if he gets the nomination i think its bad news for us.
Obama is an AA bumpkin, and even if he is as corrupt as Clinton (which I doubt, but maybe he is just better at faking it), he won't have nearly as strong a ground operation to flesh things out. Obama may be further to the left, but he would be less effective, and to me, that translates to being less dangerous for America.
I may be too old to understand what’s going on?
Anyone else feel this way?
Obama is already moving his rhetoric toward the center of the political spectrum. I think he is going to be tough to beat in November, and I’m quite sure that Mike Huckabee would have no chance at all against him.
No. He is the best general election candidate on their side and we will very likely lose to him. I’m gonna make a ton of cash on intrade in the process but it’s sad.
Many people on this site are enjoying attacking other Republicans. Good. Enjoy the years of Obama, you’re asking for it.
He wasn’t overly concerned about The Huckster’s win and was of the mindset Hillary was the biggest loser in Iowa.
He was asked if he would take Huck’s call tomorrow if he did call and try to make up and Rush said Huck was NOT going to make that call.
I think Rush will try and take Huck out completely, starting with the 1st hour of his show. Will be fun to be tuned in.
Thanks for the info.
I don’t know whether Obama or Hillary will win the nomination. Primaries, however are much different than general elections and caucuses are different than typical primaries where people pull the lever in private.
I’m just not sure that in a general election, enough people are willing to pull the lever for a black. They may say they are in public, but in the privacy of the booth, I’m not sure they will.
“Huckabee... I have no words for Huckabee, other than, who in their right mind, and with any, erm, mind, would, *ever*, would vote for him after that foreign policy 4-th grader paper he issued ? Not even going to touch all the taxing, and pardoning, and government-expanding, and ‘preacher-in-chief’ stuff.”
But he’s a “Christian leader”, and that’s all that counts to some folks.
Huck could not even pass an 8th Grade Geography test.
He has no business running for President and is not fit for the Hope, Arkansas City Council.
heheheeeee!
buuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmppppp !!!
Gotta love that title. Go, Hussein !! hahaaaa!
Everybody cool their jets, all this talk as if Obama and Huck are a sure thing, this is only Iowa, we’ve got a long way to go. A lot can happen between now and the nomination.
The general will pit a liberal dem running to the center and the repubs will run a moderate/liberal who ran for the nomination as a conservative running back to center. The problem is that they get to run to the right and the republican has to run left to get to the center. Clear as mud, huh? Add in a biased media and it won’t be an easy task to win.
Unless, of course, the Republicans had the smarts to nominate Duncan Hunter who is on the right, stays on the right and will continue in the general to run on the right.
Democrats OWN racism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.