[Lexinom]

No, I stand by the comment. I have a pretty good memory, and remember many folks arguing for his candidacy based on TV presence.

I must have struck a nerve here. Sorry.

[perfect_rovian_storm]

I have a pretty good memory too. And I remember quite well how so many haughty supporters of other candidates used to tell us that back when Fred was thinking about getting in.

Then, Fred’s work and position papers set the standard for all the candidates. A standard, which nary a single one has yet to live up to, I might add.

I stand by my comment as well.

[rintense]

Not this freeper. His Hollywood status means nothing to me. Its his record as a conservative that won my support.

[SuziQ]

I have a pretty good memory, and remember many folks arguing for his candidacy based on TV presence.

Your memory must be failing you, because those of us who have supported him since the first idea of his entering the race, are not doing so because we were fans of his acting gigs. We've been noting his Senate accomplishments, and his stands on the issues, as noted in his ABC commentaries and his appearances on the Paul Harvey show. I'm not going to say that some are fans of his work in TV and movies, and may be inclined to support him for that, but the vast majority of us are in it because of his IDEAS.