Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa GOP refuses to report Keyes votes
via email | January 4, 2008 | Ambassador Alan Keyes

Posted on 01/04/2008 8:29:29 PM PST by TBP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: inkling

January 6, 2008

DES MOINES, Iowa — In the wake of allegations that Iowa Republican Party officials violated state law by refusing to release the number of votes cast for presidential candidate Alan Keyes in the Iowa caucuses, one Iowa caucus-goer says he saw a C-SPAN camera crew record party officials tabulating votes for Keyes.

Said the witness, “I personally saw 2 [votes for Keyes] out of about 100 being recorded in 2 districts in Carrol, Iowa. The C-SPAN camera crew was there, and they zoomed in to this particular ballot counting. They followed the head ‘counter’ as he went over and called in the results to the State office. He did give the Keyes votes and waited to be confirmed before proceeding, just as he did with all the other candidates. It is the Iowa State GOP that is withholding the election results.”

A state party spokesperson has claimed the party has no tally of votes for Keyes that can be released to his campaign, and told campaign leaders that party officials would get back to them “in a few days” with a total. Meanwhile, the votes received by all the other presidential candidates were released almost immediately after the caucuses.

The votes for all GOP candidates except Keyes were tallied electronically. Keyes’ name was left out of the electronic counting because — according to one party official — Keyes announced his candidacy “too late” to be included.

Keyes launched his presidential campaign on Sept. 14, nine days after Fred Thompson entered the race.

The Iowa caucus attendee who says he saw C-SPAN videotape evidence of votes for Keyes wrote the following at the Keyes website, AlanKeyes.com:

“Some people who post here . . . do not understand the seriousness of the blackballing that is going on. When the mainstream media does it, it is a shame — it shows that they are not real news people, but hacks, and they should be shamed at least. But when the political party itself blackballs a candidate, it is criminal! They not only violate the candidate, but also every single voter, every citizen! Most importantly, they trash our democracy!”

The poster continued, “I really thought a huge lesson was learned with the ‘chad incident’ [in Florida’s 2000 general election for president]. Apparently the ‘lesson’ wasn’t learned — votes can still be thrown away.”

“We need to all ‘howl to the rooftops,’” the writer said, “before more of these primary states’ GOP elitists think they can do the same. We need ‘fire in our bellies’ and maybe this is it. We stood by while our Grand ‘Ol Party was overrun by RINO’s, NeoCons, libertarians, ‘Big Tent’ idiots and [others], and now we reap what we have sowed ... Soviet styled elections!”


81 posted on 01/06/2008 9:06:46 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

I’ve listened to a number of Keyes speeches and he makes good sense. Sometimes he does get strident and preachy but that is no reason to disavow the truth of what he says. He would do well as secretary of education.


82 posted on 01/06/2008 9:20:02 PM PST by fella (The proper application of the truth far more important than the knowledge of it's existance."Ike")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Don’t pull the “black folk” excuse on me after I suffered through the Dems’ debate last night and after the results of the Iowa Dems caucus.

Dr. Keyes has those gems, and those gems, rather than his color, should have been his message. “Excuse me, let me finish,” would have sufficed when he was interrupted.


83 posted on 01/07/2008 1:46:10 AM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Keyes claiming he was left out on purpose is just raising dust.

Right, like he was 'accidentally' prevented by force from engaging in the presidential debate years ago? Remember that?

I'm not a Keyes supporter this time around, but let's face it- the GOP establishment hates the guy and what he stands for.

84 posted on 01/07/2008 2:01:18 AM PST by ovrtaxt (People seemed to be content, $50 paid the rent, FREAKS WERE IN A CIRCUS TENT, Those were the days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TBP
They are true to tradition.

Several presidential primary campaigns before, in Iowa in 1996 I believe, on the GOP side, they apparantly tinkered with some things and fooled around (and got caught).

The IOWA GOP officials refused too candidates' representatives, for Buchanan and Dornan (also anti-establishmentarian like Keyes this time) access to a tabulation room, but allowed access to reps from Dole and some other RINO centrist nitwit. This is the nature of the business with the GOP in many parts of the nation.

When they are threatened, they start up all kinds of things from the big bag of tricks.

85 posted on 01/07/2008 2:13:37 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Your FR Pledge: Bookmark It Today! "I Won't Support Mitt/Rudy/McCain/Huckster in General Election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
What possible difference could it make?

JMHO... but, whether you care for him or not -- whether he has a chance to win or not -- every candidate's tally should be reported. If not, we are only a few steps and a bit of media intervention away from not having any choices left.

86 posted on 01/07/2008 2:26:04 AM PST by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Apparently, he makes the GOP Establishment nervous.

Yeah. Those seven votes have them shaking in their Guccis.

87 posted on 01/08/2008 4:35:13 AM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson