Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa GOP refuses to report Keyes votes
via email | January 4, 2008 | Ambassador Alan Keyes

Posted on 01/04/2008 8:29:29 PM PST by TBP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Keyes promoted reparations.

Do you know what type of reparations Keyes suggested? Keep in mind, this was only a response to a question about reparations...not a promotion of such. His suggestion was a tax credit for two years for only those blacks that actually worked and filed with the IRS. Nothing else...period.

41 posted on 01/04/2008 9:13:11 PM PST by A_Tradition_Continues (Sanitized for your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

In the Iowa caucus there is no writing, you go to the location and they count you by group or something
From what I gather


You gather correctly about the Democratic caucus..... plus you have a 15% threshold or your group votes don’t count.

But the Iowa Republican does it a little different in that you choose your candidate on paper and turn it in to be counted and it is over. No threshold is applied.


42 posted on 01/04/2008 9:17:47 PM PST by deport ( --- 4 days New Hampshire votes--- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Keyes promoted reparations. When and where?

There are so many sources available that I'm astonsished that you've made such an ignorant request. That said, here's one:

Keyes idiocy

Oh, were you under the impression that this is DUh?

Ordinarily, I extend deference to long time FReepers. In this case, I make an exception. You are without doubt an ignorant fool.

43 posted on 01/04/2008 9:19:23 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: deport

interesting the Snooze would describe the Dems caucus and not the GOP one, they also described one of the local Dem caucuses and not a GOP one.


44 posted on 01/04/2008 9:19:48 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Are you sure? It sounds like Keyes was a write-in...it’s been a while since I’ve been actively involved in politics, but even today, isn’t it labor intensive to count write-ins?
I’m assuming Tancredo was still on the ballot even though he withdrew.

OTOH, if Keyes actually was on the ballot then yes they have no excuse.


45 posted on 01/04/2008 9:23:24 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Oh, c'mon. Keyes makes bucks regularly now by being a political nutcase with a gift of gab. Every four years he gets to tour the country and stay in nice hotels.

If he gets dissed by Republicans and Democrats alike, what does he expect? Nobody promises him a rose garden everytime he throw's his dunce's cap into a ring. His whining is getting redundant every election, but actually it's a calculated part of his act to stay in the public eye.

The guy has a good gig going for himself. He'll always make a buck and get paid for speeches as long as there's folks still clinging to the idea that he's the great black hope.

It's all so chic to be for Keyes every four years......and so intellectually comical.

Leni

46 posted on 01/04/2008 9:24:17 PM PST by MinuteGal (Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
List of candidates and their Iowa addresses. Keyes aint on it

It is curious that the Tancredo votes were counted though

47 posted on 01/04/2008 9:24:21 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues

I am fully aware of this, and it was racist reparations in my view. Sorry, no pass or quarter given.


48 posted on 01/04/2008 9:26:10 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TBP

*No room for limited government types in the GOP? I wonder what other *types* the neo-Republikrats don*t like? Gun owners, maybe, or pro-lifers? Anti-globalist *types*? Face it, it*s like Zell Miller stated, *I didn*t leave the party (Democratic), the Party left me.* God help us.


49 posted on 01/04/2008 9:29:03 PM PST by luvadavi (Duncan Hunter in 08--a choice not a RINO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The opportunity to educate our Party is the gift that Dr. Keyes can bring to the table. I want to hear more about the Constitutional and historical reasons to support prolife, profamily, small government.

However, I quickly learned to dread hearing from Dr. Keyes during the Iowa debate. When he spoke, it was mostly to complain about not getting enough attention and then a second or two of gems. I love the gems, but it’s painful to suffer the dramatic sighs and complaining delays in the debates about how the Ambassador was slighted.

I do not believe that it was helpful to the causes that Dr. Keyes explains so well to join an already crowded field.


50 posted on 01/04/2008 9:29:20 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
They were probably describing the Democrat caucus procedure.

The Republican caucus format is much simpler and straight forward. Republicans have an actual one-time vote and every vote counts.

I’ve posted this many times over the last week, so I guess it won’t hurt to post it one more time. This is an abbreviated outline of the different procedures:
The DEMOCRATIC Party
Step 1 - Democratic party members will meet in one of the 1,781 precincts in Iowa, which are designated schools, public buildings, and private homes to elect caucus delegates. To determine meeting locations, individuals may contact their County Party Chair or State Party Headquarters.
Contact County Party Chairs.
Contact State Party Headquarters.

Step 2 - At the individual Democratic caucus meetings, individuals will gather in separate groups according to which candidate they are supporting. Those who are undecided will be asked to join one of the groups already formed.

Step 3 - These caucus meetings will determine the popularity of each candidate and will decide which candidates are to be retained and which are to be eliminated. Only candidates receiving 15% support from the individuals in the meeting will be eligible for the candidacy. Individuals supporting a candidate who received less than 15% support will be asked to join one of the other groups.

Step 4 - This procedure of determining the percentage of support for each candidate may take some discussion until the process of elimination leaves a handful of candidates with no less then 15% support. This number will be broken down based upon the number of delegates that this particular caucus is representing. For instance, if a caucus is heavily populated, there may be 4 or more delegates to be elected, and so a group would need 15% of the participants in that caucus in order to qualify; If a caucus is electing only 2 delegates, a group would need 25% to qualify; and if a caucus is electing only 1 delegate, a group would need 50% of the participants to qualify.

Step 5 - The results of the percentages received and the number of caucus delegates for all of the meetings held that night are reported to party headquarters. From there, the figures are tabulated to determine in rank order the candidates with the most caucus delegates. This concludes the Democratic participation in the caucuses.

Next, the Democratic party will begin the process of selecting the 56 delegates that will represent the state of Iowa.

Step 6 - After the caucuses in each county, a County Convention will be held to select the delegates for the District Convention. Again, at this level, they will use the 15% rule, which stipulates 15% of the delegates are needed in order to consider a candidate viable.

Step 7 - After the County Convention, a District Convention will be held in which all of the counties in that district will select the delegates, of which there are 29 total for the state. Again, the 15% rule to determine viable candidates will be followed.

Step 8 - The State of Iowa Democratic Convention will convene to select the delegates who will represent the candidates in the National Convention, again using the 15% rule of support. The State Convention, at this time, will prepare a total of 56 delegates for the National Convention, at which the official Presidential Candidate for the Democratic party will be decided.

The REPUBLICAN Party

Step 1 - Republican party members will meet in one of the 1,784 precincts in Iowa, which are designated schools, public buildings, and private homes to elect caucus delegates. To determine meeting locations, individuals may contact their County Party Chair or State Party Headquarters.
Contact County Party Chairs.
Contact State Party Headquarters.

Step 2 - At the individual Republican caucus meetings, a straw poll is taken by secret ballot to influence the delegate.

Step 3 - One person = one vote. The straw poll is an informal type of voting where the local votes are tabulated to gauge opinion.

Step 4 - The tabulated votes from the local precinct straw polls are sent to the state party headquarters to announce the winner of the straw poll popular vote, and hopefully influence the selection of delegates. This concludes the Republican participation in the caucuses.

Next, the Republican party will begin the process of selecting the 41 delegates that will represent the state of Iowa.

Step 5 - After the caucuses in each county, a County Convention will be held to select the delegates for the District Convention, using the influence of the straw poll as a guide.

Step 6 - After the County Convention, a District Convention will be held in which all of the counties in that political district will decide on just 3 delegates to represent each district. There are 6 districts in Iowa for a total of 18 delegates.

Step 7 - The State of Iowa Republican Convention will decide upon a total of 23 more delegates, along with the 3 additional delegates per district, for a sum total of 41 delegates who will represent the candidates in the National Convention, at which the official Presidential Candidate for the Republican party will be decided.

We Republicans do other things after the main vote. Nominate and elect precinct committee members, nominate and elect delegates, nominate and elect alternates, etc.

However, as you can see, our Presidential caucus is a straight-up honest vote.

51 posted on 01/04/2008 9:30:20 PM PST by 2111USMC (www.Fred08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues

You’re kidding, right? Under what justification should I, whose ancestors never owned slaves, should I subsidize people who have grown up in this Nation because of some of their ancestors were slaves?

One of my grandmothers was an indentured servant according to family history. What do I get?


52 posted on 01/04/2008 9:33:46 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
How much reparation money are we talking to make him go away ?

Right How much reparation money are we talking to make him go away ?

I'm with you. Do we need to hear any more from this popeyed clown?

53 posted on 01/04/2008 9:35:38 PM PST by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: deport

Contrary to previous practice, the state party issued “suggested” ballots to all precinct chairs - ballots which did not contain Alan Keyes’ name. Most precincts, from what I can gather, used them. In precincts where someone spoke up, they were allowed to write in his name.

Then, when it came time for precinct chairs to call in the results, the automated system they had set up also made no provision for reporting Keyes’ name. Ergo, not a single Keyes voted counted.

Every Keyes voter was disenfranchised in the election in several important ways.

I take it quite personally, since among the number of those who were disenfranchised is my twenty-one year daughter, voting in her first presidential election. She is quite upset that the man she respects so much, having followed him and known him since she was a little girl, is being treated in this manner. This is going to color her view of politics throughout her life. Same with my thirteen year-old junior delegate son who was present to see it all.

My eldest son, who lives in another state, is also aghast at what has happened. He’s in the National Guard, and called me from camp today to find out what in the heck is going on. Is this what he’s defending?

There’s alot more to this story - the treatment Alan has received at the hands of the party hacks has been abysmal throughout - but I’m too tired to type in all out tonight.

God, help America.


54 posted on 01/04/2008 9:40:00 PM PST by EternalVigilance (<<<<-------Click and view)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mylife
What will you call your favorite candidate when votes for him are not counted for whatever reason and he complains? Excuse me, but this is still America and in America we have freedom. Freedom to run for office, freedom to be treated exactly like every other candidate. Freedom to expect a fair count. What if all that noise in the south east tail of the country over hanging chads had gone the way of the big thief. Just think about what you all are saying when you would deny Alan Keys his right to have the votes for him reported right along with all the others. It’s American. You don’t have to support him politically but you darn well better support his right to be in the running. It’s the American way. Wake up.

In America we strive for fairness. We want truth, even when we don't like what the truth is. When we no longer want what's fair for EVERYONE, then America ceases to be America. Ask the Chinese or Russian or North Koren of Iranian citizens? They'll explain it better than I have.

55 posted on 01/04/2008 9:51:43 PM PST by Picklezz (HUNTER: SOLID - A Conservative's Conservative. He's the man for the job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
"Didn’t he loose to Obama?"

Do you mean "lose"?

No, he didn't lose to Obama. Keyes is a Republican and Obama is a Democrat. They were not running against each other, only against other members of their own party. And took place in Iowa, not Illinois.

56 posted on 01/04/2008 9:59:30 PM PST by Hoof Hearted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Picklezz

Who won BIG in Iowa? Obama.
The same Obama that handed Alan his ass oner a junior senators seat.
He didn’t stand a chance at the presidency.

No one excluded him on purpose(well probably not) and he knows it. He doth protest to much. Keyes is just being dramatic again.

Im not even sure if he met the requirements to be in the thing.
Certainly he didn’t notice that he wasn’t listed as a candidate.
I ain’t voting for a guy who doesn’t even know if he is on the ballot.

Shouting that the republicans rigged the election against a blackman is damaging to the party and Keyes is to little of a man to understand that his actions damage his own party.


57 posted on 01/04/2008 10:05:12 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Dr. Keyes can be a great spokesman for constitutional government when he stays on message, but he would be a disaster as president.


58 posted on 01/04/2008 10:08:53 PM PST by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TBP
The Dummies could really make noise with this, Republican Racist do not allow only black candidate on ballet.
59 posted on 01/04/2008 10:09:48 PM PST by Peacekeeper357 (Happy New Year! In 2008 I wish you health, wealth and happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peacekeeper357

Hopefully Iowa is tallying Keyes votes and they will announce them and Keyes will go away before that happens


60 posted on 01/04/2008 10:12:35 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson