Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Fix is in for Hillary
Poe.com ^ | January 7, 2008 | Richard Lawrence Poe

Posted on 01/07/2008 3:29:17 PM PST by Richard Poe

by Richard Lawrence Poe
Monday, January 7, 2008
Permanent Link
Past Columns

FORGET IOWA. Forget New Hampshire. Forget the Democratic primaries altogether. The fix is in for Hillary Clinton. When Democrats convene this August in Denver, they will nominate Hillary as their candidate for President of the United States.

The day after Hillary’s loss in Iowa last Thursday, her campaign chief Terry McAuliffe told reporters, “Listen, Hillary is going to be the nominee. There’s no question.”

McAuliffe was not indulging in wishful thinking. He was stating a fact. He knows things the rest of us do not.

One thing McAuliffe knows is that Hillary controls a decisive majority of the Democratic Party superdelegates. The superdelegates control 42 percent of the votes needed to nominate Hillary. They may vote for whomever they wish, for any reason, and may change their minds at will. In August, they will nominate Hillary.

Democrats started the superdelegate system in 1984, to give party leaders tighter control over the nominating process.

This was partly in response to the catastrophic defeat of George McGovern, the radical, anti-war demagogue who, in 1972, lost every state in the union except Massachusetts to Richard Nixon.

To prevent such maverick candidates from winning the nomination in future, party leaders rigged the system. State delegates were no longer permitted to nominate presidential candidates on their own. Henceforth party-approved superdelegates would also cast votes.

Superdelegates are party stalwarts, Democrat officials whose loyalties favor party over state. Their number varies from one election to the next. Currently there are 852 superdelegates, including 29 state governors, 232 congressmen, 49 senators, two “shadow” or non-voting senators from the District of Columbia, and 540 Democratic Party leaders and officials of various sorts.

At this year’s Democratic Convention, 4,049 delegates will vote. Hillary must get 2,025 votes to win the nomination. This is the so-called "magic number". The 852 superdelegates total 42 percent of the magic number. In a close race, their votes could prove decisive.

At this writing, CNN reports that 257 superdelegates have already pledged their votes: of them, 154 (60 percent) have pledged for Hillary; 50 (19 percent) for Barack Obama; and 33 (13 percent) for John Edwards.

Should Hillary falter in the primaries, the superdelegates will likely come to her rescue and nominate her anyway.

The Web site 2008 Democratic Convention Watch offers updated lists of superdelegates who have and have not pledged their votes.

Of course, Hillary cannot win from superdelegate votes alone. She must get a sizeable number of state delegates as well. This presents no problem for Hillary. Her political machine is deeply entrenched in America’s urban centers. These crowded cities can overwhelm rural voters, bringing entire states into Hillary’s camp, with large numbers of delegates.

The decisive date will be February 5, dubbed Super Duper Tuesday by political pundits. Twenty-four states will hold their primaries that day.

"These states include some of our largest and most delegate-rich states, such as California, New York, Illinois, Georgia, New Jersey and others," notes Steven Hill, political reform director for the leftwing New America Foundation. "Together these two dozen states hold enough delegates to nearly decide the presidential nomination all by themselves."

Hillary is counting on that. As Steven Hill explains, "Having a single primary day with so many states... gives great advantage to those candidates with the most campaign cash and name recognition... It creates a virtual wealth primary in which new presidential faces will be quickly eliminated."

In any contest of wealth, Hillary has the advantage. Her blue-chip backers include the likes of Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, wife of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild of the famed Rothschild banking dynasty.

“I'm always doing everything I possibly can for Hillary Clinton…”, Her Ladyship told Portfolio magazine. “I have been waiting for this since Bill Clinton left office, frankly.”

Married November 30, 2000, Lady de Rothschild spent her wedding night in the Clinton White House.

OpenSecrets.org reports that Hillary has raised $90.9 million, only slightly higher than Obama’s $80.3 million.

However, most of Hillary’s money is off the books. No one knows how many millions Hillary has laundered through George Soros’ “Shadow Party”, a network of Democrat front groups masquerading as non-partisan charities. These include Fund for America, the Democracy Alliance, America Votes and Media Matters for America, among others.

Republicans need to stop gloating over Hillary's every misstep and see the big picture. Hillary has the money, the machine, and the support of global financial elites. Unless we can muster a counterforce of similar strength, Hillary will win the nomination and the presidency.

Richard Lawrence Poe Richard Lawrence Poe is a contributing editor to Newsmax, an award-winning journalist and a New York Times bestselling author. His latest book is The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Sixties Radicals Siezed Control of the Democratic Party, co-written with David Horowitz.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democratics; hillary; hillaryclinton; shadowparty; soros; superdelegates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: Richard Poe

Hey that’s alot of good info and links packed in there. Thanks. My comment: Maybe the Republicans need a superdelegate system too to prevent populist radicals from winning the nomination? Thoughts all?


41 posted on 01/07/2008 3:59:41 PM PST by Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
Democrats started the superdelegate system in 1984, to give party leaders tighter control over the nominating process.

Just like the Politburo.


42 posted on 01/07/2008 3:59:52 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
And a fix in this primary would make the Chicago Democrat Convention of 1968 look like child's play.

Visions of truther nuts dance in my head.

43 posted on 01/07/2008 4:00:49 PM PST by Milhous (Gn 22:17 your descendants shall take possession of the gates of their enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill

Don’t know if it will go that far, but I do have a feeling that the Empire is about to Strike Back.


44 posted on 01/07/2008 4:02:02 PM PST by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Totally agree. Let her burn her own to climb to the nomination for the rats. In doing so, she will leave such a stench that she couldn't be elected dogcatcher...

My only concern is if she has a 2nd ace up her sleeve for the nationals. The rats are not above breaking the law to win. Remember their motto: "The end justifies the means.". They want to win at any cost. We need to be prepared to go to the mattresses on this if fraud is evident...

45 posted on 01/07/2008 4:02:44 PM PST by Dubh_Ghlase (In the land of Clinton, where the shadows lie...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

You are right. She is not out yet, they will not go quietly. Clintonistas don’t care what the base thinks as long as it means winning, the base will hold their nose and vote for her. All the overconfidence on other threads makes me nervous, we should not be underestimate the Clinton machine.


46 posted on 01/07/2008 4:03:19 PM PST by bayareablues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Bookmarking.


47 posted on 01/07/2008 4:03:44 PM PST by abner (I have no tagline, therefore no identity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

In advance of the big day, I recommend all Hitlery and Bubba’s corruption be readied for exposure. Then, we can enjoy a weekly or daily dose detailing the demise of all their room temperature associates and illegal campaign finances. Get out the popcorn.


48 posted on 01/07/2008 4:04:26 PM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I compared it earlier to Saddam Hussein setting fires to the oil wells. If she can’t have it, there is no more vidictive politician.


49 posted on 01/07/2008 4:04:47 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

That is fine. It will be easier for the Repubs to deal with her baggage than fighting the Osama Obama race card.


50 posted on 01/07/2008 4:06:10 PM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple
If this human toilet hillary is the dem candidate, she'll lose the general election by a larger margin then Kerry's loss to Bush in '04.

Mondale '84 repeat anyone?

51 posted on 01/07/2008 4:07:30 PM PST by Centurion2000 (It's only arrogance if you can't back it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
The DNC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Clinton Inc.
52 posted on 01/07/2008 4:07:30 PM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Oh, if this happens the rat party will be splintered.

Hillary dumpty had a great fall and party hacks could not put back together.


53 posted on 01/07/2008 4:10:53 PM PST by razorback-bert (Remember that amateurs built the Ark while professionals built the Titanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
As Steven Hill explains, "Having a single primary day with so many states... gives great advantage to those candidates with the most campaign cash and name recognition.

This works true on the R side as well.

54 posted on 01/07/2008 4:13:54 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

VLWC?


55 posted on 01/07/2008 4:15:30 PM PST by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("I have so many opportunities for this country." Senator Hillary Clinton, D-NY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
Today, we saw a surprising number of transparent parts of the strategy.

What disappointed me is how many folks fell for the Drudge story {leaked by the Clintonistas} this morning.

56 posted on 01/07/2008 4:15:31 PM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: byteback
The only drawback in Richard's argument is Hillary running out of cash by then. She would have done much better to skip Iowa and spent it all on Super Duper Tuesday.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

57 posted on 01/07/2008 4:16:08 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Your article; it’s a beautiful thing.


58 posted on 01/07/2008 4:18:04 PM PST by Dan Lacey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
It could be their leak. On the other hand, they never expected Obama to give them real trouble. Her crowds are getting smaller and smaller and her campaign looks like its on life support. This was supposed to be a coronation not a drawn out slugfest.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

59 posted on 01/07/2008 4:18:08 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
To prevent such maverick candidates from winning the nomination in future, party leaders rigged the system. State delegates were no longer permitted to nominate presidential candidates on their own. Henceforth party-approved superdelegates would also cast votes.

The will of the people be d@mned--the party will always know what is best for them.

The Hopers and the Changers aren't going to like this one little bit....

60 posted on 01/07/2008 4:20:59 PM PST by Mygirlsmom (Who cares who does Hillie's hair, we know her HSUS are straight from China.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson