Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr

i highly doubt that estimate. many people in the early ‘80s bought pc’s just because they were less expensive (not necessarily better).


25 posted on 01/08/2008 12:06:50 AM PST by robomatik (thompson/hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: robomatik

http://oldcomputers.net/ibm5150.html

http://www.landley.net/history/mirror/timelines/2241419.html

“2. IBM PC 5150 — The smartest move IBM made in developing its entry in the growing personal computer market in 1981 was using off-the-shelf parts that were interchangeable. That was also its undoing. The IBM PC became a standard not because of the IBM brand, but because the design was easily copied and sold for less. Its original price tag was $3,000 for a base model with a single 5 1/4-inch floppy drive and 64 kilobytes of memory, and its Intel 8088 chip chugged along at 4.77 MHz. Still, the design of most of today’s Windows-based PCs is little changed.”

http://blog.wired.com/wiredphotos6/2006/12/9_ibm_5150_pers.html

On Aug. 12, 1981, IBM launched the 5150 and changed home and office life forever. The system packed a 4.77-MHz Intel 8088 processor and up to 256 KB of memory, weighed 25 pounds with “diskette” drive, and sold for $3,000.

***

On top of that, my father still has the sales receipt for his original PC (long since consigned to the scrap heap). He paid a heck of a lot more than $3K for his - but the base price was listed there as, surprise, $3K.

Thank you for playing. You lose. Again.

Perhaps you should try recovering some of the bad sectors of your memory.


26 posted on 01/08/2008 12:17:30 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: robomatik
i highly doubt that estimate. many people in the early ‘80s bought pc’s just because they were less expensive (not necessarily better).

That's not an estimate... it's accurate.

There are a lot more. I remember buying the first AT Clone for one of my clients from a hole-in-the-wall PC maker in San Francisco in September 1984 for a bargain price of $2795 ... the IBM-PC-AT, released in August 1984, was $4995.

Does this poke a large enough hole in your theory that people bought IBM clones instead of Macs because they were cheaper? Again, the Mac was competitive.

28 posted on 01/08/2008 1:22:29 AM PST by Swordmaker (We can fix this, but you're gonna need a butter knife, a roll of duct tape, and a car battery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson