Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco Gun Ban Ruled Null and Void
NRA-ILA ^ | 01/09/07 | staff

Posted on 01/10/2008 7:13:23 AM PST by epow

Fairfax, VA – The California State Court of Appeals announced today their decision to overturn one of the most restrictive gun bans in the country, following a legal battle by attorneys for the National Rifle Association (NRA) and a previous court order against the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

“Today’s decision by the California State Court of Appeals is a big win for the law-abiding citizens and NRA Members of San Francisco,” declared Chris W. Cox, NRA’s chief lobbyist.

In 2005, NRA sought an injunction against the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to prevent them from enacting one of the nation’s most restrictive gun bans. NRA won the injunction, but the City’s mayor and Board of Supervisors ignored the court order and approved a set of penalties, including a $1,000 fine and a jail term of between 90 days and six months, for city residents who own firearms for lawful purposes in their own homes.

“We promised our California NRA members in 2005 that we would fight any gun ban instituted by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, and we haven’t given up that fight,” continued Cox. “Today we see our second win for the Second Amendment against the San Francisco gun ban. We beat them once in court and the City’s attorney appealed based on his personal disagreement with the court’s first decision to overturn the ban. Now we’ve beaten them again. The California State Court of Appeals has upheld the state preemption law.”

Today’s decision came in the form of a 3-0 opinion in favor of the lower court ruling overturning the gun ban.

“This decision is a thoughtful and well-reasoned legal opinion,” concluded Cox. “I'd like to thank our approximately 4 million members, including the hundreds of thousands of members in California, for their continued commitment to protecting our cherished freedoms.”

-nra-


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunban; overturned; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Maybe the NRA isn't completely useless after all. If it keeps this up I just might, emphasis on "might", consider returning to the NRA fold which I left last summer after it backed the last gun bill that Schumer and his gungrabbing pals conned the NRA and many normally pro-gun legislators into supporting. The NRA leaders keep insisting that the bill was an improvement over the old law, and a safeguard for the rights of gun owners and prospective gun buyers, especially combat vets, who may be suffering minor mental impairment. But that simply can't be true if Schumer and his gun hating pals such as McCarthy and Biden had any part in getting it passed into law, and they were 100% behind this bill.

See THIS if you want to see how completely some of the usually pro-gun Senators were duped by Schumer and his pals.

1 posted on 01/10/2008 7:13:25 AM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: epow
>>NRA won the injunction, but the City’s mayor and Board of Supervisors ignored the court order and approved a set of penalties, including a $1,000 fine and a jail term of between 90 days and six months, for city residents who own firearms for lawful purposes in their own homes.

The NRA may have won, but what's to stop Than Franthisco from simply ignoring the court this time too?

2 posted on 01/10/2008 7:19:16 AM PST by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow

oops..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1951400/posts


3 posted on 01/10/2008 7:20:12 AM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d
The NRA may have won, but what's to stop Than Franthisco from simply ignoring the court this time too?

Let's see what happens when they try to impose their rules on a law-abiding citizen. Hopefully it'll be a minority single mother protecting her family from a "trans-gendered" home invader. Talk about a liberal dilemma!

4 posted on 01/10/2008 7:24:37 AM PST by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: epow

The NRA is not useless, they are very good a promoting firearm sports and teaching gun safety and things like that, but when it comes to politics and protecting gun rights, they wrong as often as they are right... I.O.W., support the NRA for it’s good points, but give most of your money to GOA!!


5 posted on 01/10/2008 7:25:37 AM PST by logic (Support Duncan Hunter for the 2008 GOP presidential nominee. He is the ONLY conservative candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d
Probably nothing.

BTW, I posted this article without searching for a prior posting of the same article. I have apologized for my negligence on the other thread and asked the moderator to withdraw this thread.

For further comments on the article please ignore this thread and go HERE.

6 posted on 01/10/2008 7:25:43 AM PST by epow (Isn't it odd how hard working people seem to get all the lucky breaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: epow

You must be spanked.


7 posted on 01/10/2008 7:27:59 AM PST by starlifter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: epow

HA HA!

You can take my gun out of my cold dead fingers.


8 posted on 01/10/2008 7:28:58 AM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha (Smoke clears and Fred Thompson is President))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

See # 6. I apologized over there for not checking for a prior thread on the same article, and I have asked the mods to delete this one.


9 posted on 01/10/2008 7:30:14 AM PST by epow (Isn't it odd how hard working people seem to get all the lucky breaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: epow

no problem


10 posted on 01/10/2008 7:31:40 AM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: starlifter
You must be spanked.

Agreed, and I’ll take care of administering that punishment to myself if I can find my rubber foam padded ping-pong paddle. (try repeating that fast 5 times)

11 posted on 01/10/2008 7:36:44 AM PST by epow (Isn't it odd how hard working people seem to get all the lucky breaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Hey Nully, someone’s talking about you....


12 posted on 01/10/2008 7:42:01 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow

Sorry San Francisco, but you can’t burn the parts of the Constitution you don’t like.


13 posted on 01/10/2008 7:44:39 AM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow

Please do not talk about spanking in a thread about San Francisco.


14 posted on 01/10/2008 7:50:12 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d
The NRA may have won, but what's to stop Than Franthisco from simply ignoring the court this time too?

Nothing will stop this bogus US City until the California Justice Department investigates the actions of this Board and Mayor and bring charges that they have violated the oath of office and the State law.

15 posted on 01/10/2008 8:01:40 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: epow

“Maybe the NRA isn’t completely useless after all.”

That was my first thought on this as well...


16 posted on 01/10/2008 8:04:08 AM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“San Francisco Gun ban ruled null and void.”

They are mad at you in SF.


17 posted on 01/10/2008 8:04:52 AM PST by ThomasThomas ( _/|\_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ßuddaßudd
Hey Nully, someone’s talking about you....

*sigh* It's hell being popular...

18 posted on 01/10/2008 8:18:44 AM PST by null and void (Conservatives are tired of being sucked up to every 4 years and stabbed in the back for the next 3.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
“San Francisco Gun ban ruled null and void.”

They are mad at you in SF.

It's mutual.

19 posted on 01/10/2008 8:20:01 AM PST by null and void (Conservatives are tired of being sucked up to every 4 years and stabbed in the back for the next 3.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: epow

Don’t get carried away. It’s not clear how much the NRA really had to do with this (this report, after all, is from their own site). The California State Court of Appeals was likely to uphold the state’s per-emption law with or without the NRA encouraging it to do so — the decision was unanimous, and was affirming a lower court ruling, and pre-emption laws on various matters have been routinely upheld all over the country. San Francisco remains under the same oppressive gun laws as the rest of California.


20 posted on 01/10/2008 9:10:34 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson