Hunter walks the walk on protectionism.
No thanks Duncan.
yeah, go support the other sissies then
...and illegal immigration, in defending the country, in supporting our troops, fighting for pro-life causes...
Read this and get back to us on the “protectionism” rhetoric.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReagan/2007/10/10/where%e2%80%99s_the_fire
Who do you support?
Well, Oneron99 has already showed up to bash Hunter. Now I’m just waiting on Petronski to chime in as well here.
Eh ????
What do you mean by “protectionism” ?????
Protectionism? That could have been said by any union straw boss.
Without someone like Hunter walking the talk on national sovereignty, fiscal conservatism, strong military and stiff criminal punishments, 2nd Amendment and pro-Life, what’s there to protect?
Protectionism is an ignorant, meaningless globalist red herring.
Fair Trade works, free trade kills economies of developed nations for the benefit of their enemies.
“Hunter walks the walk on protectionism.”
I am a Fred guy but that is bullsh*t.
Protectionism, you mean as in not allowing other countries to charge tariffs on our goods while we charge none on theirs ? That type of protectionism ?
Protectionism?
There is a balance you know.
Safe Sex is not protectionism.
Safe trade is not protectionism Heres a Quarter, Call me when our currecny is devalued to 50 cents on the Canadian dollar, Its at about 98 now.
Seeking a balance of trade is not protectionism.
You sound like you simply repeat a talking point from the Paul campaign.
I agree that Duncan Hunter’s belief that the protectionism of other nations is best met with protectionism by the United States is mistaken. But I’ve nevertheless always found Hunter to be a knowledgeable, principled and articulate defender of said mistake.
That’s why I don’t understand how Mike Huckabee, who ‘in 2003... pushed for free trade with Mexico, calling for a “strong market of the Americas” and supported NAFTA (AP 10/03/03)’ somehow seems to have become stolen the “fair trade” protectionist position from Hunter, much as he’s stolen the “Fairtax” mantle from him. The difference seems to be that Huckabee is sunny, funny and “feels the pain” of others ala Clinton, whereas Hunter is somber and serious. Or maybe voters feel that, in terms of a political career, a person who has “only” been a representative shouldn’t be president... One can only guess why Hunter, who has carried water for these issues for years in principled fashion, is being left in the dust by someone else who, whether sincere or not, just came to them.
Protectionism? Trade? Please, give me a break, it’s fair trade he’s after.
Do your homework before you throw that nonsense around...
Drive-by posting is a fav of trolls from DU.
What name do you go by in DU?
CHINA ROCKS!!!!!!!!
Yea!