Posted on 01/11/2008 4:32:44 PM PST by Def Conservative
“Whom did I belittle, for Heaven’s sake? And how?”
Be it far from me to defend Romney. But everytime you post Rasmussen results you call him “Slick Willard” and Huckabee the “Huckster.”
So, you complain to a moderator because I suggest that Bork and Fred could both use some Metamucil. With funny pictures to match.
Just turned on the tv- Fred will be on Hannity and Colmes after the break- shortly
“Slick Willard” is a reference to Romney’s trustworthiness: DIRECTLY RELEVANT.
“Metamucil” is a reference to Fred’s age, IRRELEVANT.
“Fred/Bork 2008!!!”
Bork thinks the 2nd amendment is a collective right, and called the 9th a meaningless “ink blot.”
i don’t understand Bork worship.
“McCain and, especially, Huckabee, are so horrible that I can’t support them under any circumstance.”
Then I guess you won’t get to vote in the general election then? Unless, of course, you are going to vote for a libertarian (libertine).
Well, I say Go Fred - that is go buy some Metamucil Fred - so you can GO Fred - and stop being a cranky old man with a grudge.
Duncan Hunter is the most conservative running, and is the cream of the crop as far as I’m concerned.
As to his electability, my vote is based on who is a genuine conservative and will be good for this country, and there’s only one man currently running that has that: Duncan Hunter.
I have nothing to do with taking cyanide tablets in smaller dosages by electing a RINO....in the end, it’s still poison and they are killing this country.
No that is OPINION. Revelancy is OPINION.
I have really got to start using spell checker more.
saddle up or sidle up?
Who did Coulter endorse?
Relax, I am just floating a big fat balloon.
“Slick Willard” is a reference to Romney’s trustworthiness: DIRECTLY RELEVANT.
In YOUR opinion.
“Metamucil” is a reference to Fred’s age, IRRELEVANT.
I disagree. I think that he is old and grumpy is very relevant. I don’t see you defending McCain when people bring up his age.
Like I said, you are practicing hypocrisy.
You’re wrong.
Criticism of positions, beliefs, anything that is a matter of choice: RELEVANT.
Criticism of characteristics, especially immutable characteristics like race, gender, age: IRRELEVANT.
Please, please, enjoy yet another piping hot bowl of FAIL.
Make childish poop jokes about McCain and I'll defend him too.
Your candidate is a juvenile. Are you?
Yeah; Judge Bork, you go my man.
Me too !!!
I don’t care which it is Romney or Thompson. If Thompson can get popular he has my vote, otherwise it is Romney. We saw in the debates that he(Thompson) is capable of much more than he has been showing. I hope it lasts.
Yikes, thanks Old P!
“Your candidate is a juvenile. Are you?”
Your candidate needs depends. Do you?
See, anyone can do that. You make a statement as being fact and then proceed to use it to attack. Straw man fallacy in action.
Mike isn’t junvenile, he is actually witty. Fred dishes out “zingers”, but that isn’t junvenile? More hypocrisy.
“Please, please, enjoy yet another piping hot bowl of FAIL.”
I will leave that joy to you next week when Fred loses in South Carolina to either Huckabee or McCain. In fact he will probably come in behind both plus Romney.
In truth, I get no enjoyment on zinging Thompson. However, he started the fight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.