Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spectre; kinghorse

Actually in the polls I’ve seen he does not seem poll so well among women in general. I would say that’s an area he needs to work on.


34 posted on 01/11/2008 7:02:09 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Norman Bates

I didn’t know that. Oh well, next. This is slim pickings I tell ya. Brokered convention?


56 posted on 01/11/2008 10:52:03 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

From an historical perspective and considering where we are with the ME and Pakistan and particularly regarding his stance on Iraq, a case can be made for McCain being the inevitable nominee. If intl events break just right between Sept and Nov, he’s there. McCain would be the next in line based on running and getting jammed by the party the time before, Bush in this instance. There’s a pecking order to these nominations sometimes. Not always the best way to go. Look at the less than stellar candidates both parties have had to run out of loyalty over the years. Kerry and Bob Dole immediately come to mind. On the other hand President Reagan was a loyalty nominee after getting jammed by the party in 76.


58 posted on 01/11/2008 11:00:11 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson