I think there’s a difference. I’d much rather have Romney than the other two.
FWIW, I spent too much time in MA while the guy was gov. No thanks.
Agreed. McNuts and Huckaboom are just too liberal.
I may actually vote for Romney here in Michigan simply because I don’t want McCain, and would love a brokered convention.
I agree with you. Romney hasn’t wavered in any of the debates in his stance concerning illegal immigration, government spending, the need for lower taxes, and the necessity to keep up the fight against what he always calls “global jihad.” I like that he doesn’t use Bush’s meaningless “global terrorism” line.
The tough anti-illegal immigration sheriff from Arizona who is a Romney backer points out that Romney was the first governor to have his state police trained and certified by ICE to go after illegal aliens. Romney also insisted that there be English immersion, not bilingual education, for students in Massachusetts who can’t speak English. I noticed that Massachusetts ranks in the top five states in educational achievement in a recent survey. And Romney is an executive who’s had to meet payrolls and has created jobs and turned around failing companies. He’s also familiar with international business and the growing economic competition from China and India. These are all unique qualifications that no other Republican or Democrat can match, certainly not McCain or Huckabee.