[John Jorsett]

DISENFRANCHISEMENT! VOTE SUPPRESSION!

Oh wait, that’s unpossible. These are Democrats. Never mind.

[Mike Darancette]

When it comes right down to it the Democrats don’t want people to vote.

[randog]

Oh, this is priceless! Liberals suing to “disenfranchise” their own voters, many of them minorities! Get the popcorn!

[Mr_Moonlight]

creates a system in which voters at the at-large precincts can elect more delegates than voters at other precincts. The lawsuit employs a complex mathematical formula to show that voters at the other 1,754 precincts would have less influence with their [multiple] votes.

There, fixed it .....

[Nathan Zachary]

So, this means trhat if you belong to a union, you aren't allowed to vote for who ever you please? You have to vote for whom the union tells you to vote?

Communists/ Hitlerites. Isn't socialism wondefull?

[TRY ONE]

Love the site of a RAT knife fight!

[JLS]

I don’t really understand why the legislature or courts of would have anything to say about the rule a private party has for determining who represents it. If Dims want to give blacks two votes in every caucus or even primary it is there business, isn’t it? I guess one could make an argument elections are held using state officials and monies. A caucus really seems to be a pure private matter held on private property by private individuals.

[rellimpank]

—snickering and giggling as I hope it deteriorates into near bloodshed-—

[combat_boots]

FIX!

GERRYMANDER!

FRAUD!

[Ann Archy]

WAKE UP YOU DEMOCRATS!!! the CLINTONS are CORRUPT and POWER HUNGRY and will NEVER let a BLACK GUY come near the PRESIDENCY!!!

[randita]

Mr. Ralston said it is unclear whether there are ties between the lawsuit and the Clinton campaign but, he predicted, “Even if they’re Hillary supporters, the campaign’s going to say they had nothing to do with it.It is unclear when the court will hear the matter.

Even if there is no connection between the lawsuit and the Clinton campaign, most people will believe there IS a connection.

[NonValueAdded]

Suppress the vote, suppress the vote ... democRATs to suppress the vote ... film will never be shown at 11 ... or any other time. Liberals make me sick.

[libstripper]

First the Clintonoids steal the NN primary from Obama by schlepping thousands of unqualified voters, now they try to disenfranchise a whole union and its members who DARE TO OPPOSE THE WITCH. Now, will someone please tell me which party "favors the little people?"

[Continental Soldier]

There is a world of distance between teachers and the teachers’ union. That teachers are such immature followers only gives the union hustlers entry to big time politics. Many teachers, dare I say most teachers, vote differently than their masters recommend. That those teachers keep allowing their union leaders to divert their recommendations and their monies to candidates they don’t like, is the clearest evidence that educators and education are in some very sorry states, indeed.

[freekitty]

Most of them are probably illegal; but to put a voting area at a resort.

Who says some guests might go over there and vote too?

[SE Mom]

It simply doesn’t get any better.

[668 - Neighbor of the Beast]

Equal justice under the law bus.

[doug from upland]

I just spoke with Jon Ralson, the LV SUN reporter who broke this on his blog. He, of course, had no idea about Hillary’s campaign finance fraud and the upcoming trial of Paul v Clinton.

[doug from upland]

I just spoke with Obama HQ in Las Vegas. They are supposed to be sending me a statement from their media dept.

[Timeout]

Sorry, but could someone clarify this for me?

I THINK the point is that they’ve created these “at large” precincts at workplaces? I assume it bypasses having to vote in the precinct where you reside. Is that right? I have no idea how they conclude it gives more weight to votes in the at large precincts.

It’s still delicious watching Dems pulling their polling place shenanigans on one another for a change.