Skip to comments.
Pro-Family Coalition, Mass. Leaders, Come to Michigan to Warn Voters (Romney's Anti-Family Record)
Christian Newswire ^
| 1/12/08
| Christian Newswire
Posted on 01/12/2008 1:17:56 PM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: whatisthetruth; greyfoxx39; MHGinTN; xzins; Petronski; NYer; Coleus; narses
Dont be fooled, this is ALL about evangelicals dislike of Romneys Mormon faith. If you believe that, you are the one who is being fooled.
Is the opposition to Rudy due to the fact that he claims to be a Catholic?
21
posted on
01/12/2008 2:43:50 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
22
posted on
01/12/2008 2:47:27 PM PST
by
greyfoxx39
(Mitt willingly gives up his personal freedoms to his church..why would he protect YOURS!)
To: Bushwacker777; greyfoxx39; MHGinTN; xzins; Petronski; Coleus; narses; NYer; Salvation; ...
If the Hucksters are successful in nominating Huckabee (or allowing himm too many delegates in the convention to ignore) and the Democrats win this election then these trailer park rejects deserve the suprmem court theyll get that will make the US into a new Holland. I couldn't even tell you who the Hucksters are on FR, ALL of the pro-life, pro-family Evangelical and Catholic FReepers I know of are behind Duncan Hunter and/or Fred Thompson.
But if you feel that it is necessary to refer to us as "trailer park rejects," you should at least learn basic spelling and grammar.
23
posted on
01/12/2008 2:57:02 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: greyfoxx39
I haven’t seen that one before, it’s perfect!
24
posted on
01/12/2008 2:57:47 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee; Petronski
That’s not mine...I think it may be from petronski, I just “borrowed” it ;)
25
posted on
01/12/2008 3:04:32 PM PST
by
greyfoxx39
(Mitt willingly gives up his personal freedoms to his church..why would he protect YOURS!)
To: greyfoxx39; Petronski
26
posted on
01/12/2008 3:07:54 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: greyfoxx39
Not my work either. But funny.
27
posted on
01/12/2008 3:08:17 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
To: wagglebee
Is the opposition to Rudy due to the fact that he claims to be a Catholic? No comparison, evangelicals have a problem with Mormonism, not Catholicism.
To: whatisthetruth
LOL! You don’t know many evangelicals, I take it.
Why are Catholics so unhappy about Huckabee’s preacher friend in Texas. You know, the pope is the antichrist, etc.
29
posted on
01/12/2008 3:24:07 PM PST
by
jabchae
To: wagglebee
” Do not be deceived — Mitt Romney is the furthest thing from being a conservative, pro-family advocate. He in no way represents my pro-family, conservative views,” said Bennett.”
How could Mormons, who are known for being pro-family, support a candidate like this? Would republican Mormons vote for Mitt if his name was Harry Reid (a democrat Mormon?) What’s the difference?
30
posted on
01/12/2008 3:55:22 PM PST
by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense? Don't you wish everybody did?)
To: wagglebee; whatisthetruth; greyfoxx39; MHGinTN; xzins; Petronski; NYer; Coleus; narses
This is about Romney’s voting record and not about his mormonism.
However, I see no difference in the wording: Mormon Bishop Willard Mitt Romney and Baptist Preacher Mike Huckabee.
If it is OK to say the one, then it is OK to say the other.
What do you all think? I’m not a Huck supporter, but he has been picked on in the press for his baptist background FAR more than Romney has for his mormon background.
31
posted on
01/12/2008 4:57:45 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
To: xzins
Personally, I would rather just stick to the issues.
Romney flip flops and did nothing to stop gay marriage in Massachusetts and Huckabee raised taxes, gave scholarships to the children of illegal aliens, supports amnesty and no wall. And while everone is focused on Romney and Huckabee, McLame may just sneak in and win.
32
posted on
01/12/2008 5:03:51 PM PST
by
Coleus
(Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Healthy New Year!!)
To: wagglebee
Brian Camenker is an American hero.
To: Bushwacker777
If the Hucksters are successful in nominating Huckabee (or allowing himm too many delegates in the convention to ignore) and the Democrats win this election then these trailer park rejects deserve the suprmem court theyll get that will make the US into a new Holland. With Huckabee hiring a Log Cabin Republican as a senior advisor yesterday, he can't exactly call himself the evangelical candidiate any more.
To: Coleus
The issue is to put a stake in their political hearts one at a time. First, Romney because he’s the most vulnerable, but also has the most money.
We’ll allow SCarolina to reject McCain. We’ll also work to blast Giuliani in Florida. Everyone knows that with his mistress, infidelity, hating family, and radical liberal record, that he hasn’t a prayer of winning the election.
With a Thompson win in SCarolina that gives Thompson the lead heading into the South.
35
posted on
01/12/2008 5:10:03 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
To: dmw
Would republican Mormons vote for Mitt if his name was Harry Reid (a democrat Mormon?) Whats the difference? Harry Reid has always identified himself as pro-life and Nevada was somewhat moderate to conservative when he was first elected. So, I have a feeling that a lot of Mormons DO help Reid get elected.
I think the better question is, would the Mormons all support Romney if he WAS NOT a Mormon?
36
posted on
01/12/2008 5:15:18 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: whatisthetruth
You can bury your head in the sand if you wish, as can others who feel as you do. As people of conscience, we have forwarded the truth, so as far as folks like you, our job is done.
Burying heads in the sand should be left to ostriches, but if you want to join them, just do it and resist the urge to bash others who don’t.
These are the facts. This article is about men of character, most of whom know the Constitution inside out and backwards. People who are not about to cower in fear when an agenda tells them to be silence. Most rational realistic minded people are going to say God Bless them, and it’s high time we heard from someone, anyone, about the circumvention of the Constitution.
Further, Romney was on a talk radio program where he took calls. The show was saved and is available to listen to for yourself. Romney was asked why he illegally ordered clerks to issue licenses and ordered that marriage licenses to be altered to read “partner A and partner B”. Mr. Romney close to answer by claiming he fought the alteration of “birth certificates to make them read parent a and parent b.” A mistake? by a man of superior intelligence? Doubtful. Much more likely an attempt to skirt the issue, and not answer the question.
37
posted on
01/12/2008 5:18:16 PM PST
by
gidget7
( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
To: whatisthetruth
evangelicals have a problem with Mormonism, not Catholicism.Sure. Evangelicals just love catholics. LOL
38
posted on
01/12/2008 5:20:01 PM PST
by
ladyjane
To: whatisthetruth
That claim is simply a cop out, a claim for the purposes to discrediting those opposed to his candidacy. There are not 100 people in the entire country who feel that. We have enough to deal with living with the repercussions of the Romney administration to even be concerned about what he believes in or doesn’t believe in.
39
posted on
01/12/2008 5:21:28 PM PST
by
gidget7
( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
To: Coleus; xzins
Personally, I would rather just stick to the issues. I agree, my problem with Romney has nothing to do with his Mormonism, it is due to his liberalism.
Orrin Hatch is a conservative Republican who happens to be a Mormon and I would have had no problem supporting him if he had ever run for president.
40
posted on
01/12/2008 5:22:58 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson