Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Fascism (Jonah Goldberg) on C-SPAN2 Book TV @ 10PM Central 1/12/08
C-SPAN ^ | 1/12/08 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 01/12/2008 7:00:04 PM PST by Monitor

Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning

Author: Jonah Goldberg

Upcoming Schedule

Saturday, January 12, at 10:00 PM Sunday, January 13, at 3:30 AM Sunday, January 13, at 10:00 AM Monday, January 14, at 1:00 AM

About the Program

Jonah Goldberg explores the political theories of fascism and contends that there are several colloaries between the politics of the left and fascist ideology. Jonah Goldberg presents his book at The Heritage Foundation in Washington DC.

About the Author

Jonah Goldberg is contributing editor for the National Review and a columnist for the Los Angeles Times. Mr. Goldberg's writing has appeared in several publications, including "The New Yorker," "Wall Street Journal" and "USA Today."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: booktour; cspan; fascism; goldberg; jonah; liberal; liberalfascism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: RussP
If you are a conservative, you believe in minimal government intervention into the free market. If you are a fascist, you most certainly do *not* believe that. So as far as economics is concerned, you cannot be both conservative and fascist. But you can certainly be both “liberal” (modern sense) and fascist. It’s really about as simple as that.
No you can't. Modern "liberals" fundamentally *cannot* be fascist. Just as conservatism can't be fascist because it doesn't believe in state intervention, liberals don't believe in fetishizing the past, an necessary condition for fascism. How many times do we have to go over this?
21 posted on 01/14/2008 2:02:50 AM PST by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

“Modern “liberals” fundamentally *cannot* be fascist.”

Baloney. Look at how willing so-called “liberals” are to take away your children and put them in foster care if you do not conform to their standards for raising children.

Look at how willing “liberals” are to confiscate your land if a puddle forms on it!

Hell, they just outlawed incandescent bulbs, for crying out loud. Why shouldn’t I be allowed to use the kind of bulb I want? Free market, my ass. (I actually use CFLs, but it’s the principle here.)

Sorry, but your statement displays an astounding level of ignorance. What are you doing here on FR?


22 posted on 01/14/2008 3:06:11 AM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RussP
Baloney. Look at how willing so-called “liberals” are to take away your children and put them in foster care if you do not conform to their standards for raising children.

Look at how willing “liberals” are to confiscate your land if a puddle forms on it!

Hell, they just outlawed incandescent bulbs, for crying out loud. Why shouldn’t I be allowed to use the kind of bulb I want? Free market, my ass. (I actually use CFLs, but it’s the principle here.)

Sorry, but your statement displays an astounding level of ignorance. What are you doing here on FR?
Sigh... can you use words with any degree of precision at all? It's rather amusing that you can have the temerity to call anyone else ignorant. You don't even know what fascism *is* do you? I'll give you a little hint, learn the difference between fascism and totalitarianism. Another wise move might be reading some Hannah Arendt.
23 posted on 01/14/2008 3:28:54 AM PST by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

“You don’t even know what fascism *is* do you?”

I’m starting to figure out what’s going on here. I’m arguing with an arrogant liberal. I shouldn’t be wasting my time, but I’ll try to educate you on the basics.

In a nutshell, fascism is a political system in which the government allows private industry to operate and make a profit, but is very heavy-handed in meddling in their operations and practices. Fascists tend to be very hard on smaller businesses. And modern liberalism obviously has a lot in common with fascism.


24 posted on 01/14/2008 3:42:46 AM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RussP
I’m starting to figure out what’s going on here. I’m arguing with an arrogant liberal. I shouldn’t be wasting my time, but I’ll try to educate you on the basics.

In a nutshell, fascism is a political system in which the government allows private industry to operate and make a profit, but is very heavy-handed in meddling in their operations and practices. Fascists tend to be very hard on smaller businesses. And modern liberalism obviously has a lot in common with fascism.
Uuuuum... no. You don't understand fascism *at all*. Do you always spout off on things you're desperately ignorant of? Do you even know what a "fasces" is? Or where the term "fascism" came from?
25 posted on 01/14/2008 3:47:26 AM PST by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ketsu
The whole liberalism is fascism carnard doesn't inform debate, it just inflames emotions and rallies the faithful.

I disagree.

If one defines fascism as the State controlling the actions of its citizens, then Liberalism and Fascism are the same phenomenon (just advanced to different levels).

26 posted on 01/14/2008 3:52:54 AM PST by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ketsu
liberals don't believe in fetishizing the past, an necessary condition for fascism.

You are in error. Fascism at its heart is an economic system. The State lets you own private property; it just tells you what you can do with it.

There is nothing inherent about fascism that "fetishizes" the past.

27 posted on 01/14/2008 3:58:54 AM PST by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

It would be good for you to give the definition of fascism that you are using. The word has been so misused, it’s meaning is no longer clear.


28 posted on 01/14/2008 3:59:49 AM PST by listenhillary (A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Monitor

[Jonah Goldberg explores the political theories of fascism and contends that there are several colloaries between the politics of the left and fascist ideology.]

He is right about that.


29 posted on 01/14/2008 4:01:39 AM PST by kindred (Where have all the conservatives gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

[Anyway, as I pointed out in my first post, fascism and liberalism are inherently opposite.]

Political correctness looks, acts, and destroys others rights and opinons and is therefore facism. Note also, that political correctness and nazism are both grounded in socialism, the desire to get along at the cost of free thinking that the conservative mind rejects.
PC is facism, a wolf in sheeps clothing.


30 posted on 01/14/2008 4:06:23 AM PST by kindred (Where have all the conservatives gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; listenhillary
You are in error. Fascism at its heart is an economic system. The State lets you own private property; it just tells you what you can do with it.

There is nothing inherent about fascism that "fetishizes" the past.
Fascism is first and foremost and *ideology*. The term comes from the Roman fasces, an axe surrounded by a bundle of sticks, meant to suggest unity and an attempt to reestablish an imperial past. German fascism is very similar, the Nazi's goal was to reestablish the "pure" land inhabited by the German "volk".

The essence of fascism is *reaction*(i.e. it's a reactionary ideology). Fascism is an attempt to recreate or reestablish the glory days of an ethnic group. It tends to be totalitarian, which is where are this piffle equating it with socialism and modern "liberals". It's not.

Liberalism and Fascism are all *totalitarian* ideologies. They advocate the complete control over the individual by the state. It's a "kind of" relationship(i.e. lemons and apples are "kinds of" fruit, although a lemon is not an apple).

The essence of fascism is not totalitarianism, it's a longing for an imagined "better" or "purer" past.
31 posted on 01/14/2008 4:11:43 AM PST by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ketsu
Fascism is an attempt to recreate or reestablish the glory days of an ethnic group. It tends to be totalitarian, which is where are this piffle equating it with socialism and modern "liberals".

As far as German Fascism is concerned, you are correct wrt exaltation of one race or ethnic group over all others.

I have found reading Peikoff's book "The Ominous Parallels" quite instructive. Well worth the read.

Liberalism is also concerned with race and ethnicity. It is all about exaltation of all other races and genders over one(white males).

I view them as very similar in tactics and ideology. BTW, I've read Mussolini's famous paper on fascism. I am familiar w/ the definition you reference.

32 posted on 01/14/2008 4:17:58 AM PST by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

I would agree with others that the economic system put in place by the fascists is the essential part of fascism.

I also agree that nationalism was an ingredient of fascism.


33 posted on 01/14/2008 4:18:07 AM PST by listenhillary (A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Liberalism is also concerned with race and ethnicity. It is all about exaltation of all other races and genders over one(white males).
Liberals don't care about race per se. They care about victimhood. Liberalism identifies obsessively with whoever they think is the "underdog". Hence the support for all of the supposedly "oppressed" sections of society(women, minorities, gays etc...). Race only matters as a method of defining victimhood.

Liberalism and fascism *are* similar, but fundamentally comparing the two is an apples and oranges analogy.
34 posted on 01/14/2008 4:24:08 AM PST by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ketsu
Liberals don't care about race per se. They care about victimhood. Liberalism identifies obsessively with whoever they think is the "underdog". Hence the support for all of the supposedly "oppressed" sections of society(women, minorities, gays etc...). Race only matters as a method of defining victimhood.

Oh contrare, my FRiend. I work in an organization where the color of one's skin enhances your chances for promotion and plum positions. It's no longer about "victims." Quite a few of the "women and minorities" being advanced are being advanced b/c they are "women and minorities", not "victims."

35 posted on 01/14/2008 5:15:56 AM PST by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

Oh, Lordy. Now were into pedantic word derivations. At one time I knew all about the derivation of the word “fascism,” but I forgot it, and it is completely and utterly irrelevant to the current discussion.


36 posted on 01/14/2008 12:17:53 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

“Liberalism and fascism *are* similar, but fundamentally comparing the two is an apples and oranges analogy.”

Liberals (modern sense) tend to be socialists. The original Italian and German fascists *were* socialists by every meaningful measure. So liberals and fascists have a lot in common.

Your problem is that you don’t even recognize that the Nazis were socialists, despite the fact that they called themselves socialists and were democratically elected on a socialist platform. So you are in denial of basic reality. Discussions with people like you are very unlikely to be fruitful.

Goldberg’s main thesis is that fascism is a Leftist ideology, and he documents that thesis abundantly and overwhelmingly. The reason fascism is considered “right wing” is because good ol’ Uncle Joe Stalin started that myth to help discredit the fascists. We don’t need to be burdened any longer with Stalinist myths.


37 posted on 01/14/2008 12:27:09 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RussP

One more point about Stalin. I’m not sure if he actually called fascism “right wing,” but he emphatically claimed that it was an abomination and was opposed to communism. So the Western commies assumed that fascism must be a “right wing” ideology because “right” is opposite of “left.” That’s like hearing the leader of the Crips cursing the Bloods — and concluding that the Bloods must therefore be working for the police.


38 posted on 01/14/2008 1:44:03 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RussP
Liberals (modern sense) tend to be socialists. The original Italian and German fascists *were* socialists by every meaningful measure. So liberals and fascists have a lot in common.

Your problem is that you don’t even recognize that the Nazis were socialists, despite the fact that they called themselves socialists and were democratically elected on a socialist platform. So you are in denial of basic reality. Discussions with people like you are very unlikely to be fruitful.

Goldberg’s main thesis is that fascism is a Leftist ideology, and he documents that thesis abundantly and overwhelmingly. The reason fascism is considered “right wing” is because good ol’ Uncle Joe Stalin started that myth to help discredit the fascists. We don’t need to be burdened any longer with Stalinist myths.
Uuuum... no. You still don't know what socialism is either. You're stuck on the newspeak definitions which tend to mean "anything I don't like". I'm willing to bet your definition of socialism will be as laughably bad as your definition of fascism.

The Nazi's *were not* socialists. If you had the faintest idea what fascism and socialism actually stand for as ideologies you would know that. But you've long since established that you're militantly ignorant and unwilling/incapable of actually using and understanding words with any degree of precision.

Goldberg's thesis is equally laughable.
39 posted on 01/14/2008 9:36:35 PM PST by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RussP
Oh, Lordy. Now were into pedantic word derivations. At one time I knew all about the derivation of the word “fascism,” but I forgot it, and it is completely and utterly irrelevant to the current discussion.
Are you really this ignorant? Is anyone?
40 posted on 01/14/2008 9:38:11 PM PST by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson