Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AIDS Patients Face Downside of Living Longer (effects of AIDS drugs "worse than having AIDS")
New York Times ^ | January 6, 2008 | JANE GROSS

Posted on 01/15/2008 6:18:55 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281 next last
To: jas3; GodGunsGuts

GGG’s agenda was apparent, but his thought process was murky and not open to debate using reason. He was not willing to give any credence to other’s experiences. It was not worth my time to continue the discussion. Ping to GGG for courtesy.


121 posted on 01/15/2008 4:50:49 PM PST by rusty millet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: jas3

jas3, please do no send messages to me anymore, and please do not follow me around from thread to thread. Thanks you—GGG


122 posted on 01/15/2008 4:51:04 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

Comment #123 Removed by Moderator

Comment #124 Removed by Moderator

To: rusty millet

My mind is open to anything you are willing to discuss. I believe Duesberg to be correct because I believe he has discovered a profound scientific truth with respect to AIDS. If you are an honest person, then I welcome any questions/challenges you might have. And whatever you might think, one way or the other, this is most definately a conservative issue.

POLICY REVIEW (Hoover Inst.):

http://www.duesberg.com/about/pdpolicy.html

NATIONAL REVIEW:

http://www.duesberg.com/articles/tbcure.html

AMERICAN SPECTATOR

http://search.opinionarchives.com/Summary/AmericanSpectator/V25I5P18-1.htm

REASON MAGAZINE:

http://www.duesberg.com/articles/kmreason.html

REGNERY PUBLISHING (Largest conservative publisher in the USA)

http://books.google.com/books?id=pRWVZJKO0NsC&dq=regnery+duesberg+inventing+the+aids+virus&pg=PP1&ots=0mkvQbR7FV&sig=PWeCq416dis6Oo-05B1emK3gTr8&hl=en&prev=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=regnery+duesberg+inventing+the+aids+virus&sa=X&oi=print&ct=title&cad=one-book-with-thumbnail#PPP1,M1


125 posted on 01/15/2008 5:06:24 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

To: jas3

Please stop following me from thread to thread, and please stop posting to me, jas3. Thank you.


127 posted on 01/15/2008 5:16:50 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: jas3; GodGunsGuts

It’s a curious philosophy that wants science “left to the free market” and then wants to be protected from the comptition.


128 posted on 01/15/2008 5:31:57 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

Comment #129 Removed by Moderator

Comment #130 Removed by Moderator

To: jas3

Don’t do that again! By the time I got back from being this other person my dog had bitten me.


131 posted on 01/15/2008 6:23:04 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

I am perfectly willing to discus this issue with anyone who has honest doubts or questions. This is a conservative issue. I will grant that it has not yet broken through to mainstream conservatives, but in order for it to do that it first has to have a chance to have it’s day in the sun. As I pointed out above, Duesberg’s challenge to the failed HIV-AIDS hypothesis has been published in National Review, Policy Review, American Spectator, Reason Magazine, World Magazine, and his book was published by Regnery, the largest conservative book publisher in the country. Surely that qualifies this issue to be discussed on FR????


132 posted on 01/15/2008 6:26:06 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

couldn’t find a better choice of words huh?

Totally unconscious, but let’s face it....


133 posted on 01/15/2008 6:28:49 PM PST by Chickensoup (If it is not permitted, it is prohibited. Only the government can permit....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Hah...looks like the dog bit post #130 too !

I wonder what was wrong with it?

:-/

jas3


134 posted on 01/15/2008 6:29:53 PM PST by jas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

The nuts and bolts of the science itself should be neither “liberal” nor “conservative”. It’s one thing to oppose someone else’s politicizing science to further a political agenda. It’s quite another to try and hijack the process for your own and claim it’s a matter of “principle”.


135 posted on 01/15/2008 6:34:30 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

PS post #125 and look into the issue for yourself. If you have any questions or challenges, I am most willing to give it my best shot. If, on the other hand, your only interest is to belittle and poke fun, I’m not interested. The choice is up to you.

All the best—GGG


136 posted on 01/15/2008 6:36:35 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

You are quite right. But if the science says one thing but the “experts” say something different, and the “experts” want to use said junk science to promote liberalism, then it most definitely is a conservative issue. Same goes for human caused global warming, etc.


137 posted on 01/15/2008 6:41:15 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
But if the science says one thing but the “experts” say something different,

There's more to establishing that to be the case than simply declaring the opposition to be wrong. If the guy's research and findings aren't withstanding peer review, the place to settle it is in the lab, not in th public square.

138 posted on 01/15/2008 6:49:54 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

But what if the AIDS establishment has used its full weight to shut said scientist down. What if they have used their influence to take said scientist’s grants away? What if they have used their considerable influence to deny said scientists right to publish? What if they have used their influence to deny said scientists right of reply to science journal papers that have been published about him? What if they leaned on said scientist’s university to take away his grad-level courses? Where does said scientist to go then?


139 posted on 01/15/2008 6:54:43 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

Actions have consequences, so do drugs....all of them including advil have side effects.


140 posted on 01/15/2008 6:57:29 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson