Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

His personal take was 3-4 billion and was the largest one year bonus ever.
1 posted on 01/15/2008 7:41:35 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: shrinkermd

“who smelled trouble two years ago”

Only a complete fool would not have smelled trouble two years ago. The question is what did they do about it?


2 posted on 01/15/2008 7:45:30 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

Will Greenspan suddely rediscover that gold is money and money is gold? And fiat money is, well, not even paper today, for electronic money does not even have the value of a sheet of paper. Will he resume writing along the lines of his essay, Gold and Economic Freedom, in which he ends two paragraphs that say why fiat money is the enemy of liberty:

>>
In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.

This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.
<<

from:
Gold and Economic Freedom
by Alan Greenspan
www.usagold.com/gildedopinion/greenspan.html


3 posted on 01/15/2008 7:48:18 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
Analyzing reams of data late at night in his office, Mr. Paulson became convinced investors were far underestimating the risk in the mortgage market.

Sheesh, all we had to do was look around our neighborhoods.

4 posted on 01/15/2008 7:49:31 AM PST by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

So the guy hired the man some hold responsible for the policies that made him billions. How convenient.


19 posted on 01/15/2008 8:57:11 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
I want to hear again the litany from some freepers that these Paulson types "produced" and deserved to kill off the housing market and many banks and mortgage funds along with many portfolios while we workers deserve to be sliced up and dined on.....

workers and savers and small investors are the real losers in this economy....

I guess we'll just have to sue people to get any money in this country..or sell drugs...

30 posted on 01/15/2008 3:54:29 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
oh so freaking what.

Everyone in the business minted money.

But, of course, every cause needs a poster boy.

32 posted on 01/15/2008 4:11:15 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (if you can't stand the heat, get out of the melting pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

*BUMP* !


36 posted on 01/17/2008 7:48:03 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson