Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. baby boomlet bucks Europe's fertility rut
MSNBC ^ | 1/15/08 | Staff

Posted on 01/15/2008 4:27:01 PM PST by xtinct

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: El Conservador
That's why I avoid immigration threads. I welcome immigrants from China, India, Great Britain and Latin America to energize our nation and to add to our growing economy.

It's the American way!

The FReepers who complains about Hispanics are a bunch of Know-Nothing thugs from the 19th Century.

41 posted on 01/16/2008 12:13:15 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
All I know is that babies are a joy to behold, and they make this strong man weak and putty-like.

Photobucket

This one becomes my neice on 03/01/08, the day I get married.

42 posted on 01/16/2008 1:10:28 PM PST by -=SoylentSquirrel=- (I'm really made of people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-
Oh my gosh... lovely baby...

My son is getting married on February 29, 2008. I'm hoping for a grandchild 9 months later... lol

He and my new daughter plan to have a few munchkins.

I can't wait. The best part of my life has been the 32 years that I've been a MOM... :o)

43 posted on 01/16/2008 1:20:43 PM PST by xtinct (I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
That's why I avoid immigration threads. I welcome immigrants from China, India, Great Britain and Latin America to energize our nation and to add to our growing economy.
It's the American way!

No, it WASN'T - until 1965.

Prior to 1965, the official immigraion policy of the United States was to admit people of European ancestry, almost exclusively (I said, "almost"). It was VERY difficut for, say, Chinese or Indians to get here.

Prior to 1965, official US immigration policies were (well, what the heck, might as well say it) exclusionary and discriminatory. As they SHOULD be, in my opinion. The underlying reason was to limit immigration to those who would resemble, and who would preserve, the traditional color and culture of the nation of the founders.

It was after the immigration reform act of 1965 that the multicultural floodgates opened. We are seeing the results of that, only now.

My current reading material is "Day of Reckoning", by Patrick J. Buchanan. Here's a relevant excerpt:
=======
"Democracy and fee markets do not a country make. Constitutions, no matter how eloquent, abstract ideas no matter how lovely, do not create a nation. A nation writes its constitution. A nations drafts its own birth certificate. What makes a people and a nation is a common and unique homeland and people, history and heritage, language and literature, song and story, traditions and customs."
=======

We are seeing that common culture, heritage, and ethnicity ripped to shreds right before our eyes, encouraged by the powers-that-be.

I realize your opinion may be different. That's mine.

- John

44 posted on 01/16/2008 1:36:44 PM PST by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Baby bump. I did my part for 2006 babies!


45 posted on 01/16/2008 1:46:38 PM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

“Kohler and others say the difference has more to do with culture than race. For example, white American women have more children than white European — even though many nations in Europe have more family-friendly government policies on parental leave and child care.”


46 posted on 01/16/2008 1:54:04 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrPiper
Thanks, I need some fools to pay for social security.

If you intend to depend on social security, I see forced euthenasia in your far future.

47 posted on 01/16/2008 2:12:18 PM PST by Centurion2000 (It's only arrogance if you can't back it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-

Congratulations. Nieces are great. If their mothers aren’t ready to kill you for something you bought them, you ain’t doin’ it right. ;-)


48 posted on 01/16/2008 2:22:54 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
That’s why I rarely post here anymore.

The barely-concealed racist rage against Hispanics on many threads is indeed hard to take.

49 posted on 01/17/2008 8:59:42 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman

And let’s not forget which Senator led the charge for the 1965 immigration reform. None other than the corpulent, drunken, boozy, mistress-dunking Senator from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy.


50 posted on 01/17/2008 11:13:57 AM PST by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson