Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2007 was 5th Warmest on Record Globally
http://global-warming.accuweather.com/ ^

Posted on 01/16/2008 7:03:55 AM PST by chessplayer

It's official, the combined global land/ocean surface temperature for 2007 was the fifth warmest on record, according to NOAA's National Climatic Data Center. Also, 2007 was the tenth warmest on record for the contiguous U.S..

--Global land surface temperature was the warmest on record.

(Excerpt) Read more at global-warming.accuweather.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2007review; agw; globalwarming; scam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last
Warmists will love this.
1 posted on 01/16/2008 7:03:56 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Whoa, hold on a second: that means that 2007 was cooler than other previous warmer years...


2 posted on 01/16/2008 7:05:51 AM PST by Democracy In Iraq (When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democracy In Iraq

Wait a minute...

There were five different 2007s?

Oh, I’m kicking some time traveler’s ass for this....

I hate temporal loops damnit


3 posted on 01/16/2008 7:06:49 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

So what....1934 was the hottest on record for the continental US and was also probably the driest year ever recorded and yet things cooled down during the 1940’s. The only global warming is in Al Gore’s hot air.


4 posted on 01/16/2008 7:07:30 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Of it was, considering how the damn thermometers were purposely put in parking lots. The whole damn thing is ridiculous.


5 posted on 01/16/2008 7:08:01 AM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

... contradicting what NASA already reported from the same data.


6 posted on 01/16/2008 7:08:16 AM PST by Ingtar (I find it amazing how deciding to run for president changes a man's stands on issues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

This was one of the colder warm 2007s in recent records in Massachusetts. We had snow by the boatload!


7 posted on 01/16/2008 7:08:16 AM PST by Disturbin ("Hey Obama, suck on this machine gun!" - Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
...1934 was the hottest on record for the continental US and was also probably the driest year ever recorded...

So does that mean putting more vehicles on the road and allowing the cows to flatulate unchecked helped cool things down in 1935?

8 posted on 01/16/2008 7:11:51 AM PST by truthluva ("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking" - JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

When you use measurements obtained exclusively in heat-island city centers and compare them with past results taken in less developed and more rural (colder) locations, the results are going to appear to confirm “warming” when in fact, what they confirm is a purposeful change in result due to methodological manipulation.


9 posted on 01/16/2008 7:12:04 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disturbin

10 posted on 01/16/2008 7:12:51 AM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Disturbin

We’ve got blowing snow (winds whipping by at a constant 30 mph and gusts as high as 55-60 right now) here in Colorado. Snow on and off. Drifts will probably happen, and it’s dadblamed COLD here.

I heard that we’re hitting as low as 15 below zero F right now, with wind chills (it’s been colder in Colorado in recent years, but damn.. it’s JUST COLD today) haha


11 posted on 01/16/2008 7:15:57 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Personally I like the idea of the earth getting warmer. Longer growing seasons, less fossil fuel dependence, summer clothes are way cuter than winter clothes, more fresh water.
If the north east really does flood, well we could use a few less nor-eastern liberals anyway.
12 posted on 01/16/2008 7:23:22 AM PST by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
The Earth is several billion years old. "Records" go back only a couple hundred years. Accurate records go back 50? years. The last 50 years out of four billion ... yeah, that makes it easy to spot a trend.
13 posted on 01/16/2008 7:30:08 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
When you use measurements obtained exclusively in heat-island city centers and compare them with past results taken in less developed and more rural (colder) locations, the results are going to appear to confirm “warming” when in fact, what they confirm is a purposeful change in result due to methodological manipulation.

When you use measurements obtained exclusively by thousands of sophisticated weather buoys, stations and satellites, assisted by powerful, number crunching supercomputers, none which existed a generation ago, and then you compare that data with data based upon infrequent and sometimes anecdotal human observations, then you are bound to obtain results that say anything you want them to say.

14 posted on 01/16/2008 7:30:40 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
This is hilarious. On their own site, in their own pol! 88% of responders are "Skeptics" or "Deniers". Notice how they fail to mention "Skeptics" in the bold section.

Tuesday, January 15, 2008 Initial Poll Results "I took a poll of the responses from the previous blog just for fun. This is clearly not a scientific poll and far from it! Keep in mind the polls are still open. Here's a running count.......... Wednesday morning update, looks like AGW has nudged ahead of the deniers. Polls will close this evening.

Skeptics.................69 votes........77%

AGW Proponents.....11 votes.........12%

Deniers....................10 votes.........11%

Apathetics................0 votes......... 0%

Second place still undecided...

15 posted on 01/16/2008 7:31:08 AM PST by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
. . .there are four groups within this debate, and they are listed below.....

1. The Apathetic group

2. The Deniers

3. AGW Proponents (Anthropogenic or Man-made Global warming)

4. The Skeptic

The fact that those who doubt AGW would be classed as “deniers”—as in the neurotic defense mechanism of “denial” or “Holocaust deniers”—while those who embrace AGW are “proponents” illustrates how biased Accuweather is.

16 posted on 01/16/2008 7:53:32 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: truthluva
"So does that mean putting more vehicles on the road and allowing the cows to flatulate unchecked helped cool things down in 1935?"

I think it means that vehicles have nothing to do with the so-called "global warming", and no cow on earth is a bigger gas bag than Al Gore.

17 posted on 01/16/2008 8:02:41 AM PST by houstonman58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I though AGW stood for Al Gore Whores.


18 posted on 01/16/2008 8:06:18 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

“thought”


19 posted on 01/16/2008 8:07:08 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Bahgdad is very cold now and there was snow last Friday for the first time in memory.

I wonder if that's all because of global warming?

20 posted on 01/16/2008 8:11:39 AM PST by Allegra (The midget hates it when I do that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Personally I like the idea of the earth getting warmer. Longer growing seasons, less fossil fuel dependence, summer clothes are way cuter than winter clothes, more fresh water.

Something quite similar happened, just coincidentally, going into the "Renaissance era".

Kinda' leads me to believe it's a good thing.

21 posted on 01/16/2008 8:12:53 AM PST by capt. norm (Those who think logically provide a nice contrast to the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
I wonder if that's all because of global warming?

No...no....no.....now that global warming is showing itself to be a joke, they're calling it "climate change", which is also a manmade disaster.

Slick, huh? ANY weather phenomenon is by definition different and "a change" from what is typical, and "change" is manmade, and bad.

22 posted on 01/16/2008 8:15:27 AM PST by Lizavetta ( Politicians: When they're speaking, they're lying - when they're not speaking, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer; xcamel
One I don't believe this, this was a cold year all around the world, they are obviously fudging the data someway

But even if we take these numbers as is, it looks like global warming is over as temps are now in a downward trend.


23 posted on 01/16/2008 8:19:04 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
NEWSWEEK: AL GORE NOW WORTH MORE THAN $100 MILLION

[Since 2000, according to published reports, the former veep has transformed himself from a public servant with around $1 million in the bank to a sparkling private consultant with a net worth estimated to be north of $100 million. He’s a senior adviser to Google, a board member at Apple and now a newly minted general partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the Silicon Valley venture-capital firm that made billions investing early in Netscape, Amazon and Google. . .If Gore’s profit-sharing deal is anything like the firm’s other 23 partners, he’s also in line to collect tens of millions of dollars a year. That’s because partners carve up 30 percent of the profits if and when the alternative-energy start-ups that KP supports go public or are sold. . .]

http://www.newsweek.com/id/71011

24 posted on 01/16/2008 8:20:10 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Did they add in the temp at the center of the earth?


25 posted on 01/16/2008 8:20:52 AM PST by westmichman ( God said: "They cry 'peace! peace!' but there is no peace. Jeremiah 6:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

California and Arizona agriculture took a multi-billion dollar hit because of the freezing (less than 20 deg. F.) weather last Feb 2007. It was the coldest Feb. in 30 years.


26 posted on 01/16/2008 8:39:56 AM PST by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy
"Hot Air Cult"

~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ™ ping~~

27 posted on 01/16/2008 8:53:25 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

The Earth is several billion years old. "Records" go back only a couple hundred years. Accurate records go back 50? years. The last 50 years out of four billion ... yeah, that makes it easy to spot a trend.

yep.

A Chronology of the Earth

Event

Date

Time

Years Ago

Big Bang

Jan. 1

12:00 AM

15,000,000,000 yr

CMB forms

Jan. 1

12:10:30 AM

14,999,700,000 yr

Galaxies form

Jan. 24

12:00 AM

14,000,000,000 yr

Sun forms

Sept. 13

noon

4,500,000,000 yr

Earth forms

Sept. 13

12:17 PM

4,400,000,000 yr

1st life appears

Oct. 24

8:48 PM

2,800,000,000 yr

1st higher forms

Dec. 19

3:07 AM

570,000,000 yr

1st land animals

Dec. 25

4:29 AM

280,000,000 yr

1st dinosaurs

Dec. 26

12:36 PM

225,000,000 yr

Dinos Rule!

Dec. 28

4:34 PM

136,000,000 yr

Dinos Die!

Dec. 29

10:02 PM

65,000,000 yr

Earliest "human"

Dec. 31

9:05 PM

5,000,000 yr

Neanderthal - CM

Dec. 31

11:50 PM

300,000 yr

Last Ice Age

Dec. 31

11:59:37 PM

11,000 yr

Pyramids

Dec. 31

11:59:53 PM

3,500 yr

USA

Dec. 31

11:59:59.6 PM

220 yr

You

Dec. 31

11:59:59.96 PM

20 yr


28 posted on 01/16/2008 9:04:04 AM PST by itsamelman (Announcing your plans is a good way to hear God laugh. - - Al Swearengen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
...and yet things cooled down during the 1940’s.

A minor addition, if I may:

and continued cooling into the 1970's (even as global CO2 levels ramped up due to the post-war economic growth).

29 posted on 01/16/2008 9:09:33 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: itsamelman

Great table. That’s a lot of typing. Can you put on the predictor’s hat and guess when the scientists will realize we are in more danger from the next ice age than from warming?


30 posted on 01/16/2008 9:20:47 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
Can you put on the predictor’s hat and guess when the scientists will realize we are in more danger from the next ice age than from warming?

1975?

"The Cooling World" - by Peter Gwynne
April 28, 1975 Newsweek

There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production – with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now.

The regions destined to feel its impact are the great wheat-producing lands of Canada and the U.S.S.R. in the North, along with a number of marginally self-sufficient tropical areas – parts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indochina and Indonesia – where the growing season is dependent upon the rains brought by the monsoon.
The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it. In England, farmers have seen their growing season decline by about two weeks since 1950, with a resultant overall loss in grain production estimated at up to 100,000 tons annually. During the same time, the average temperature around the equator has risen by a fraction of a degree – a fraction that in some areas can mean drought and desolation. Last April, in the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded, 148 twisters killed more than 300 people and caused half a billion dollars' worth of damage in 13 U.S. states.
 

To scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world's weather. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic. “A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale,” warns a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, “because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century.”

A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968. According to George Kukla of Columbia University, satellite photos indicated a sudden, large increase in Northern Hemisphere snow cover in the winter of 1971-72. And a study released last month by two NOAA scientists notes that the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental U.S. diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972.
To the layman, the relatively small changes in temperature and sunshine can be highly misleading. Reid Bryson of the University of Wisconsin points out that the Earth’s average temperature during the great Ice Ages was only about seven degrees lower than during its warmest eras – and that the present decline has taken the planet about a sixth of the way toward the Ice Age average.

Others regard the cooling as a reversion to the “little ice age” conditions that brought bitter winters to much of Europe and northern America between 1600 and 1900 – years when the Thames used to freeze so solidly that Londoners roasted oxen on the ice and when iceboats sailed the Hudson River almost as far south as New York City.

Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery. “Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as fragmentary as our data,” concedes the National Academy of Sciences report. “Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions.”

Meteorologists think that they can forecast the short-term results of the return to the norm of the last century. They begin by noting the slight drop in overall temperature that produces large numbers of pressure centers in the upper atmosphere. These break up the smooth flow of westerly winds over temperate areas. The stagnant air produced in this way causes an increase in extremes of local weather such as droughts, floods, extended dry spells, long freezes, delayed monsoons and even local temperature increases – all of which have a direct impact on food supplies. “The world’s food-producing system,” warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA’s Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, “is much more sensitive to the weather variable than it was even five years ago.” Furthermore, the growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as they did during past famines.

Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality.

31 posted on 01/16/2008 9:45:04 AM PST by itsamelman (Announcing your plans is a good way to hear God laugh. - - Al Swearengen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
contradicting what NASA already reported from the same data.

Probably not exactly the same data. Different groups use different inputs, and then do different things with them...which is why from one group to another you can get sizable differences. Take a peek at the graphs here. While they were made for a differnt purpose, they show that, for example, GISS and UKMet get different results. (RSS and UAH are two different satellite systems)

32 posted on 01/16/2008 10:07:58 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Winter 2007 saw the Phoenix, AZ area freeze for the first time in decades. People all over the valley lost trees and plants. This winter seems to be shaping up to be another really cold one.


33 posted on 01/16/2008 10:08:14 AM PST by DejaJude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...


FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH



34 posted on 01/16/2008 11:16:29 AM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro; xcamel

That’s one of my all-time favorite Ramirez cartoons, and THAT’s saying a LOT! It really sums up the closed-minded, condemning, inquisitorial attitude of the AGW “believers”.

Thanks for the smile!

xcamel: Thanks so much for the ping; I see the wackos are making fools of themselves YET again!


35 posted on 01/16/2008 11:31:55 AM PST by alwaysconservative (Governor Huckabee, it is not un-Christian to insist on enforcing our immigration laws!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Hell froze over last week when Suadi Arabia saw snow.


36 posted on 01/16/2008 11:33:47 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ontap
Of it was, considering how the damn thermometers were purposely put in parking lots. The whole damn thing is ridiculous.

Check out this graph of avg temp readings vs qty of temp stations
37 posted on 01/16/2008 11:38:26 AM PST by WackySam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: itsamelman

Neat chart!


38 posted on 01/16/2008 11:39:23 AM PST by alwaysconservative (Governor Huckabee, it is not un-Christian to insist on enforcing our immigration laws!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

You noticed that bit of prejudice at Accuweather also, didn’t you?


39 posted on 01/16/2008 11:56:35 AM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

No, no, no! The NOAA has it all wrong...the GISS has 2007 as #2 and 2007 would have been #1 except that “equatorial Pacific Ocean is in the cool phase of its natural El Nino - La Nina cycle”. It must be true because The Oregonian used the GISS report also for their story. no link for the fishwrap story, but, here is the link for the GISS report;http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/20080114_GISTEMP.pdf


40 posted on 01/16/2008 1:31:59 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
The tragedy of this whole issue is that it has been politicized. On one level Al Gore’s movie contains partisan criticism of the Bush Administration, along with skewed facts. On a larger scale is the U.N.’s program to lift blame for Third World misery from corrupt dictators and lay it at the door of the developed nations. The news media—who feed on chaos and fear—accept as gospel any single-source scientific conclusion from “experts” as long as it points to a gloomy future.

I think the average person, confronted by real problems in his everyday life, is beginning to tune out all this propaganda.

41 posted on 01/16/2008 1:36:04 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: WackySam
Check out this graph of avg temp readings vs qty of temp stations

Does this mean they had 1990's budget cuts and kept the cheapest temp stations....ie the ones closest to university parking lots?

42 posted on 01/16/2008 3:48:57 PM PST by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Good for them. Texas had the coolest wettest summer recorded in about 35 years.


43 posted on 01/16/2008 3:50:07 PM PST by Centurion2000 (It's only arrogance if you can't back it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

BUMP


44 posted on 01/16/2008 3:52:04 PM PST by Centurion2000 (It's only arrogance if you can't back it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
You noticed that bit of prejudice at Accuweather also, didn’t you?

Crap, you mean Accuweather is on the AGW bandwagon too?

Now where do I go for on-line weather?

45 posted on 01/16/2008 3:52:42 PM PST by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: itsamelman; xcamel

Thanks!


46 posted on 01/16/2008 3:59:20 PM PST by texanyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

What’s that last line mean? “Global land surface temperature was the warmest on record.”


47 posted on 01/16/2008 4:01:51 PM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel
Does this mean they had 1990's budget cuts and kept the cheapest temp stations....ie the ones closest to university parking lots?

Here's the data behind the graph-

http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/nvst.html
48 posted on 01/16/2008 4:10:29 PM PST by WackySam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Well, we’re making up for it already in early 2008. 3 inches of snow on the ground here outside of Atlanta and it hasn’t snowed this much here since 2001.

And sometime back in 2004 we had the coldest day here in Atlanta history!


49 posted on 01/16/2008 4:14:13 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I didn’t realize he was a newly minted partner at Kleiner Perkins. That explains alot.


50 posted on 01/16/2008 4:33:33 PM PST by rockthecasbah (He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson