Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

51% Say Security More Important than Privacy
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 1/18/08

Posted on 01/18/2008 7:19:06 AM PST by freespirited

Fifty-one percent (51%) of Americans say that Security is more important than privacy. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 29% disagree and say privacy is more important. Twenty percent (20%) are not sure.

The survey also found public support for strict rules regarding identification needed to obtain drivers’ licenses. Sixty-nine percent (69%) say it is a good idea for the federal government to establish such rules, while only 17% disagree.

Over fifteen states have made headlines recently by speaking out against the REAL Identification Act of 2005, which would bar anyone not possessing the proper licenses from boarding airplanes or entering government buildings. In addition to concerns about privacy, many in the opposing states fear that states will not be able to create enough funding to comply with the technology required of new the licenses.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and supporters of the legislation feel there are too many types of identification that allow people into the country, and creating federal requirements on drivers’ licenses will limit the amount of illegal immigrants entering the United States.

The public is divided on whether or not the new legislation will cut down on illegal immigration. While 49% feel the Act is at least somewhat likely to reduce illegal immigration, 42% say it is not very or not at all likely.

Regarding the new drivers’ licenses required in the Act, a quarter of those surveyed (25%) see it as an invasion of privacy, while the majority (44%) disagrees. Thirty-one percent (31%) are not sure.

Nearly half of adults (45%) have followed news stories on the issue at least somewhat closely, while another half (50%) have not followed the stories closely or at all.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: security
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: wintertime
"Call them what they are: Marxists and Useful Idiots!" Not to worry. I use stronger names than that for them in private. I tend to tone it down a bit when discussing these things with those who may be unaccustomed to hearing the truth. Too big a pill for them to swallow whole sometimes. Nobody likes being called a useful idiot. Don't win many hearts and minds that way. The schools are a problem. Some parents don't have the means for private or home education. They're forced to make their children wards of the state 8 hours a day to make a living. However, they need to at least help their kids unspin the misinformation they're being fed when they come home at night. Too many would sooner numb-out in front of the idiot box for their own dose of indoctrination.
61 posted on 01/18/2008 6:01:46 PM PST by CowboyJay (Taking fire from inside your own perimeter is the greater of two evils. Just say no to RiNO's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
Personal safety is at the bottom of my list of priorities.

I'm with you on that. The greatest threat to what is important to me has been from the day I was born and is now my own various governments.

62 posted on 01/18/2008 6:02:57 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Are you opposed to airport screening of your luggage? After all, it is an invasion of your privacy.
Nope not at all… you see the thing that I understand is this… when I go to an airport and get on an Airplane I’m getting into a privately owned vehicle operated by a privately owned – at least in theory – company and thus must submit to their rules… — Side bar… that’s what makes smoking bans in bars and restaurants illegal – but I digress… What I can’t tolerate is wondering if the CIA is listening me talk to my Arab friend when he’s traveling in England… which is more than possible… not because he or are doing anything illegal…but rather because tracking the citizenry is the stepping stone to the police state


63 posted on 01/18/2008 11:16:46 PM PST by PA_Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

What utter fools. Franklin’s rolling over in his grave.


64 posted on 01/19/2008 3:35:33 AM PST by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PA_Country
Nope not at all… you see the thing that I understand is this… when I go to an airport and get on an Airplane I’m getting into a privately owned vehicle operated by a privately owned – at least in theory – company and thus must submit to their rules…

"Their rules" come from the federal government. An outfit called the TSA. For ex, it wasn't the airlines who recently decided to limit the size of articles you take on the plane. It was an edict imposed by the govt. Your luggage is screened to insure you are complying ... with the govt rules.

65 posted on 01/19/2008 9:45:11 AM PST by freespirited (Still a proud member of the Stupid Party. It beats the Evil Party any day of the week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson