Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/19/2008 4:39:28 PM PST by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Checkers

A great victory for RINO’s, a terrible blow for America and Conservativism.


2 posted on 01/19/2008 4:45:12 PM PST by papasmurf (I'm voting for FRed, even if I have to write him in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Mormonism has a history with the earliest pioneers of Nevada. Toured there last summer and was particularly surprised at the Mormon presence there. Not surprised by his landslide victory there.


5 posted on 01/19/2008 4:52:20 PM PST by ruthles (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean people aren't out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
Romney Ran Away With Nevada

They eloped?

8 posted on 01/19/2008 4:54:19 PM PST by SIDENET (Hubba Hubba...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
they have Hillary winning 13 delegates, Obama winning 12...

So what is all the hype about Hillary 'winning'?

9 posted on 01/19/2008 4:56:36 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (The power under the Constitution will always be in the people- George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Did you not see this post by Jim at CampaignSpot?

O.K I’ll post it for you!

From CampaignSpot.

MITT ROMNEY

A Jarring Statistic in Romney’s Nevada Victory

I don’t think the Mormon card is a legitimate card to play against Mitt Romney. Love him or hate him, there are plenty of reasons to vote for or against the man besides his religion.

But if the entrance polls are accurate - that 25 percent of the GOP caucusgoers were Mormon, and that 94 percent of those voters voted for Romney - then the post-victory spin from his rivals is going to be, “Well, what do you expect? He mobilized the Mormons, and they put him over the top.” (To his credit, he also won evangelical Protestants and Catholics, but by much narrower margins.)

If accurate, that’s a wildly disproportionate turnout for that demographic. As MSNBC notes, they’re 7.5 percent of the state’s population.

I can hear the cries of, “so what?” Yes, Nevadans are free to vote for or against any candidate on whatever basis. But I’m almost as disturbed by those who vote for a candidate because of his or her religion as I am by those who vote against a candidate because of his or her religion.

I mean, I’m Catholic (and a lousy one at that), but if I put the religious denomination above all else, I’d end up voting for Mario Cuomo, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Bob Menendez, etc. ...


14 posted on 01/19/2008 5:01:37 PM PST by JRochelle (John Thune in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

The Nevada desert. What is it about the Mormons and the desert?


18 posted on 01/19/2008 5:03:11 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WOSG

ping


21 posted on 01/19/2008 5:08:26 PM PST by Checkers (John McCain is Bob Dole minus the character, humor, class, record, loyalty, mental fitness...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

So Romney comes out of the weekend with about 18-20 additional delegates while the “winners” in SC come away with fewer than 10. Not bad at all.


28 posted on 01/19/2008 5:21:12 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

1785 of 1789 precincts reporting: (NV)

Romney 51%
Paul 14%
McCain 13%
Huckabee 8%
Thompson 8%
Giuliani 4%
Hunter 2%

Paul opens can of whoopa$$ on McCain, now leads by 436 votes, and Huckabee now leads Thompson by 95...


35 posted on 01/19/2008 5:27:28 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Wow. Those Mormons sure know how to mobilize and vote for their man!


40 posted on 01/19/2008 5:32:59 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
From an AP story:"Obama, who won the kickoff Iowa caucuses less than a month ago, issued a statement that said he had conducted an "honest, uplifting campaign ... that appealed to people's hopes instead of their fears."

His campaign manager, David Plouffe, was far more pointed in a written statement that accused the Clinton campaign of "an entire week's worth of false, divisive attacks designed to mislead caucus-goers and discredit the caucus itself."

Clinton declined to comment on the allegation.

I can't wait until they campaign together in the fall. lol

69 posted on 01/19/2008 6:17:31 PM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

The Fred people love to complain about how he is ignored. But if you want to see real professional “ignoring”, check out www.msn.com.

On the entire page, Romney’s name is never mentioned. He WON the Nevada caucus, and his name isn’t given.

Instead, it says “Nevada muddle”, and in the story it claims that the only two races of interest were the Republican SC race and the democrats Nevada race.

How can you offer a news web page and not even mention the guy who WON one of the 50 states?


86 posted on 01/19/2008 10:07:31 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

self bump


91 posted on 01/20/2008 5:06:00 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 ("It may take another Jimmy Carter to get another Ronald Reagan". Rush Limbaugh Jan. 14, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson