Just the kind of circumspect style the man in charge of American foreign policy should have.
/SARC
And just the embodiment of stereotypical "evangelical" that hands a weapon over to those who believe Jefferson's doctrine of the separation of Church and State was meant to protect the State from the Church, and not the other way around.
Oh, yes. This Rodent Eater is percisely what we need in the White House. He's ready... uh huh.
He talks slowly, too.
That's basically the same argument Mitt & his apologists make for his pro-abortion, pro-gay rights stance in MA: He "had to" take those positions so he could get elected in leftist MA. It's logical to conclude that he is now just talking like a conservative to get the Republican nomination.
Face it, people. There were only two candidates who had any fixed conservative principles: the better one dropped out yesterday (Hunter) and the other is reeling (Thompson). Probably this country is going to have to endure real disaster, extreme suffering, and the loss of our freedom and prosperity, before the sheeple wake up. But then it will be too late. By then the U.S. will be another Third World socialist tyranny, or even a failed state whose polyglot population engages in tribal genocide. We were given a Republic, and we have proven ourselves unable to keep it.
This might be true, that he talks just to talk and doesn’t mean anything he says. And the writer seems to think that therefore we shouldn’t worry about Huckastupid.
But what if — just for the sake of argument (I realize it’s not going to happen) — he became President.
At that point he’d have the power to do more than just talk.
So then what would he actually DO?
Well, let’s look at his record in Arkansas.
What does that tell us about him?