Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FairTax cut for 2-parent families
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | January 19, 2008 | Howard and Raymond Richman

Posted on 01/20/2008 6:29:07 AM PST by Man50D

During an election season, one of the first losers is the truth. The current misinformation campaign against the FairTax has been particularly virulent. Last month the FairTax was being panned by some columnists as a "crackpot scheme," even though it could be collected exactly the same way as its close cousin, the value-added tax, which is the most successful tax in the world. This month the FairTax is being vilified by various columnists as a tax increase for the middle class, even though it would provide a substantial tax cut for two-parent middle class families. Specifically, in a recent column, George Will asked, "Do you want a president (Mike Huckabee, proponent of a national sales tax of at least 30 percent) pledged to radically increase the proportion of federal taxes paid by the middle class?" Similarly, Time magazine's business and economics columnist Justin Fox wrote a blog piece entitled, "The FairTax and its big break for the $200,000-plus crowd."

The FairTax is a national sales tax that would replace the income taxes, the payroll taxes, and the gift and inheritance taxes. It would be a 30 percent sales tax on retail purchases. Since 30 cents is 23 percent of $1.30 (the amount you would pay on a $1 item), a 30 percent FairTax would cost you about 23 percent of your consumption. To help you pay the tax, you would get a prebate check or a debit card credit at the beginning of each month equivalent to the amount you would pay when buying necessities. In 2007, that amount would have been based upon $10,210 spending per adult and $3,480 spending per child.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 621-636 next last
To: wintertime
It was a stupid question in that it was so broad as to cover everybody. Typical of conspiracy mavens.

Sounds like you are old enough to know that when someone approaches and says "I'm with the gov't and am here to help you" you want to make sure your exit is clear.

101 posted on 01/20/2008 11:34:01 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Now THAT’s funny.


102 posted on 01/20/2008 11:35:14 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Nothing craven about it.

I'm suggesting nothing in the Constitution authorizes such a stipend.

What part authorizes the payroll tax?

103 posted on 01/20/2008 11:35:51 AM PST by groanup (IRS. It's what we live for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
considering how the HR 25 bill allows the GOVERNMENT to define legally approved families. The sexual recreation lobby will work overtime to go heather has two mommies/two daddies.

They do it now don't they?

And piss on the pervert lobby.

104 posted on 01/20/2008 11:38:11 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Knock It Out

Just imagine if the FairTax had been quoted as 30% from the beginning. These interlopers would have accused AFFT of misleading in that case as well. They don’t have valid arguments, they are trying to protect their turf.


105 posted on 01/20/2008 11:38:27 AM PST by groanup (IRS. It's what we live for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: groanup
I'm suggesting nothing in the Constitution authorizes such a stipend.

You're "suggesting" that the Fair Tax scam is unconstitutional?

Good for you!

106 posted on 01/20/2008 11:39:34 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: afortiori
The “prebate” makes the Fair Tax proposal a graduated system, doesn’t it?

The FT isn't graduated yet, it has a lot of work to do yet to be fair and at the current rate of improvement of deficiencies is not likely to ever graduate.

107 posted on 01/20/2008 11:40:07 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
It was a stupid question in that it was so broad as to cover everybody.

That's evading the question. Typical.

108 posted on 01/20/2008 11:40:39 AM PST by groanup (IRS. It's what we live for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

You’re not going to make it with those two jackasses.


109 posted on 01/20/2008 11:42:33 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
a system with a sucess penalty with at its heart a monthly check based on “from each according to their ability to each according to their needs”

When are you going to quit lying?

110 posted on 01/20/2008 11:45:45 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Not to be picky but...

30 percent of 1 dollar is 33 cents... Nothing is fact until it’s a written law.


111 posted on 01/20/2008 11:48:06 AM PST by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knock It Out
"The difference is that you have the control over what you do with, and how much you pay from, each paycheck under the FairTax."

Pure illogic. If you have a choice to not buy food and fuel each month, you also have a choice of not going to work. You are free to not pay the income tax by avoiding (evading for the English challenged on these threads) income. Same as avoiding (evading for you statists) a sales tax by not buying.

112 posted on 01/20/2008 11:48:38 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
QQQQQQPS!!!! Winter time I have to modify -- you did finally get through to Proud2BeRight. Good job.
113 posted on 01/20/2008 11:51:34 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: e_castillo
"Nothing is fact until it’s a written law."

Pure BS. Passing a law that pi=3 doesn't make it so. Passing a law that the national speed limit is 55mph doesn't make it so either.

114 posted on 01/20/2008 11:52:11 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

So, you’re not indentured to anyone?

Do you work? How do you earn a living?

Fail to pay your taxes and see how long you keep your home, business, bank/brokerage accounts.

You are indentured servant, you just don’t realize it.


115 posted on 01/20/2008 11:52:26 AM PST by DivaDelMar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
Need an example of FT logic?

Got one right here:

"You’re not going to make it with those two jackasses."

Correct. I don't have sex using the computer.

116 posted on 01/20/2008 11:54:33 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: crz
"People who are against change are like those who P*ss against the wind.... These folks are either reliant on the feds for thier income or are actually retired and are afraid of their own shadow. "

Wrong. You can piss against the wind. You just have to be a strong pisser. I'd suggest that the Founders were considered to be pissing into the wind by many.

117 posted on 01/20/2008 11:59:44 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

They are mooching off their parents, no need to spend.


118 posted on 01/20/2008 12:00:50 PM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
They are mooching off their parents, no need to spend.

But they'll still get a monthly stipend!

119 posted on 01/20/2008 12:04:49 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
If it were better for everyone, it’d be done already.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! THAT'S THE BEST ONE YET!!

Whom do you think would have done it to make it better for everyone? The Clintons? The Kennedys? Pelosi and Reid?

Get real.

120 posted on 01/20/2008 12:06:26 PM PST by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 621-636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson