Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yeah, a real big photo opportunity. (but not much else)
1 posted on 01/21/2008 9:53:04 PM PST by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: khnyny

From the transcript (it appears Clinton’s position has changed again):

BLITZER: Senator Clinton, do you want to respond to Senator Edwards asking you whether you’re ready to commit to all combat troops being out of Iraq within a year?

CLINTON: What I have said is that I will move as quickly as possible. I hope to have nearly all out within a year.

We don’t know what we’re going to inherent from President Bush, but there is a big problem looming on the horizon that we had better pay attention to, and that is President Bush is intent upon negotiating a long-term agreement with Iraq which would have permanent bases, permanent troop presence. And he claims he does not need to come to the United States Congress to get permission, he only needs to go to the Iraqi parliament.

That is his stated public position. He was recently in the region, and it is clear that he intends to push forward on this to try to bind the United States government and his successor to his failed policy.

I have been strongly opposed to that. We should not be planning permanent bases and long-term troop commitments.

Obviously, we’ve got to rein in...

(APPLAUSE)

... President Bush. And I’ve proposed legislation and I know that members of the Congressional Black Caucus are looking at this, as well. We need legislation in a hurry which says, “No, Mr. Bush, you are the president of the United States of America. You cannot bind our country without coming to the United States Congress.” This is a treaty...

(APPLAUSE)

... that would have to be presented and approved, and it will not be.


2 posted on 01/21/2008 10:03:59 PM PST by khnyny (Clinton and Co. are the carnies of American politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: khnyny
I watched some of the debate and the resulting commentary by Wolfie and Larry King.

It really was funny when Larry Elder told Larry King that the Democrats were not taking conservative candidates seriously and was making a big mistake constantly accusing Republicans of being racists.

Larry King came unglued as Elder talked and kept butting in confirming that the Republicans were racists.

All three black panelist agreed with Elders statement so Larry suddenly switched subjects.

Everyone of the panelists on CNN somewhat agreed that no real substance came out of the debates.

One commentator stated that it was a shame that little time was spent on the economy by any of the candidates.

I'm telling you that after listening to Clinton, Obama and Edwards spin for an hour makes our republican candidates look like conservative hawks.

3 posted on 01/21/2008 10:28:48 PM PST by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: khnyny
All 3 of them are for covering health care of all illegals!
4 posted on 01/21/2008 10:42:47 PM PST by ajay_kumar (United we win, divided democrats win. How difficult is that to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson