Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diamond/DeBerrs Class Action Lawsuit
www.msn.com ^ | 1/21/08 | Marilyn Lewis

Posted on 01/22/2008 5:29:24 AM PST by SuzanneWeeks

Buy a diamond? Get a refund You may be owed a cut of a $295 million class-action settlement for gems purchased as long ago as 1994. Here's how figure out whether you're eligible and how to make a claim.

advertisement Article Tools E-mail to a friendTools IndexPrint-friendly versionSite MapDiscuss in a Message BoardArticle IndexBy Marilyn Lewis How would you like a little refund on that diamond nose stud you bought in your wilder days? Or the diamond engagement ring you purchased for your sweetie when you settled down?

If you bought a piece of diamond jewelry -- or jewelry with a diamond in it -- between Jan. 1, 1994, and March 31, 2006, you may be eligible for a refund as part of a recent settlement of a class-action lawsuit alleging that De Beers, the big South African diamond company, had cornered the market for diamonds for decades, keeping prices artificially high.

In settling, De Beers is shelling out $295 million to put the trouble behind it -- $135 million of which is earmarked for consumers rather than wholesalers.

"While we don't accept the allegations, we do believe that settling this suit is in the best interests of our clients, our shareholders and consumers," De Beers says in a statement on its Web site.

(Excerpt) Read more at articles.moneycentral.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: classactionlawsuit; debeers; diamonds; ripoff
Hey, ya never know....a little extra $$$ back would be nice!!!

Suz

1 posted on 01/22/2008 5:29:25 AM PST by SuzanneWeeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SuzanneWeeks

Of course they kept the market artificially high. The entire jewelry market in the US is artificially high.


2 posted on 01/22/2008 5:32:12 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
The entire jewelry market in the US is artificially high.

It's a market in which, in many cases, the price is the value, for the purchaser and/or recipient.

3 posted on 01/22/2008 5:41:18 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SuzanneWeeks
The real winners of the lawsuit are -- surprise!-- the plaintiffs' lawyers, says Rob Bates, senior editor at Jewelers Circular-Keystone, a diamond trade publication. "The only people who are really enriched by this are the lawyers," who stand to collect $20 million to $30 million in fees, as Bates points out in his blog, Cutting Remarks.

"That's kind of pathetic," he says. "That's just the way our legal system works. Consumers aren't going to get a lot."

That said, nobody forced these people to buy diamonds. A jewelry diamond is not even close to a necessity and DeBeers doesn't shoot mind control rays through the TV.

Why are they bailing schmucks out that 'overpaid' for diamonds by their own free will?

4 posted on 01/22/2008 5:47:36 AM PST by varyouga ("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Funny that, when you’re buying a diamond, the sales critters stress how long lasting and permanent it is.

Try taking it back later (after the 30 day return period) and they won’t even give you half the value.

Jewelry is a scam. Makes used car dealers seem ethical.


5 posted on 01/22/2008 5:49:41 AM PST by chrisser ("Europe has become a theme-park representation of its former self." - Chrisser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
It's a market in which, in many cases, the price is the value, for the purchaser and/or recipient.

I've heard it said that in the jewelry business, if a product is not selling, you *raise* the price.

6 posted on 01/22/2008 5:53:12 AM PST by Sloth (I feel real bad for deaf people, cause they have no way of knowing when microwave popcorn is done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
I've heard it said that in the jewelry business, if a product is not selling, you *raise* the price.

In that kind of marketing environment, it probably works at least part of the time!

7 posted on 01/22/2008 6:03:56 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: varyouga
"Why are they bailing schmucks out that 'overpaid' for diamonds by their own free will?"

It's a legal system created by lawyers for lawyers, and ruled on by former lawyers.

Millions of dollars to LAWYERS, simply by artificial creation of victims, like Big Tobacco, Big Oil, Big Investment, Big Auto, etc., etc.

8 posted on 01/22/2008 6:14:10 AM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson