Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutional Responses to Terrorism[Ron Paul]
House.gov ^ | 20 Jan 2008 | Ron Paul

Posted on 1/22/2008, 7:41:45 PM by BGHater

It has been over 6 years since the atrocities of September 11 were committed and there are still some very basic measures that need to be taken to bring the perpetrators to justice and make America safer. I have proposed legislation to help with these efforts and will continue to fight in Congress for the safety and security of the American people.

My legislation entitled The Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 (HR 3216) makes the surgical strike option available to the President in our mission to capture Bin Laden. Our military has been pursuing him without result for far too long now, and it is high time ALL constitutional tools were utilized in the hunt for this dangerous madman. As an American it sickens me to know that Bin Laden and top leaders of al Qaeda remain at large and thumbing their noses at us, while we unravel the sacred fabric of our constitution out of fear. It is Osama Bin Laden and the perpetrators of terrorist attacks that ought to be afraid of us, not the other way around. The answers are found in the Constitution. We should boldly root out the perpetrators and not let them get away with their crimes against us. As the home of the brave we should use Letters of Marque and Reprisal to bring Bin Laden to justice.

Also, we need to take serious steps to prevent terrorists from gaining easy access to targets on our soil. Quite alarmingly, even with the knowledge that the 19 terrorist hijackers entered our country legally, and that 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia , student visas from terrorist sponsoring countries are still far too easily obtained. In a baffling move President Bush struck a deal with Saudi King Abdullah in 2005 to allow 21,000 more Saudi young men into the US on student Visas. Of course, not all students from terror sponsoring countries are terrorists, but I place a higher premium on the security of the American people than the convenience of citizens of hostile countries. We should not be making the goals of would-be terrorists easier to accomplish, but rather should be vigilant about defending against enemies at every turn. They should not be slipping through our doors so easily, using our immigration laws against us, and that is why I proposed the Terror Immigration Elimination Act (HR 3217) to toughen standards for VISAS from countries on the State Department's list of terrorist sponsoring countries in addition to Saudi Arabia . Just as you decide who to invite to a dinner party in your home, we should be in charge of who we allow in this country, without apology.

A lot has been done to fight the War on Terror and much of it has been misdirected, but there are some tools still needed and more progress to be made. My bills The Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 and The Terror Immigration Elimination Act are logical steps in the right direction.


TOPICS: Issues
KEYWORDS: donquixote; ronpaul; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 1/22/2008, 7:41:47 PM by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater
My legislation entitled The Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 (HR 3216) makes the surgical strike option available to the President in our mission to capture Bin Laden. Our military has been pursuing him without result for far too long now, and it is high time ALL constitutional tools were utilized in the hunt for this dangerous madman.

Sounds like a DNC talking point.

2 posted on 1/22/2008, 7:43:45 PM by Niteranger68 (Proud to be a FREDNECK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

This is BS to cover his a$$ for the stupid answer he gave in that debate. We know what he really thinks and that is it was our fault they hit us.


3 posted on 1/22/2008, 7:51:30 PM by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

What a load of crap


4 posted on 1/22/2008, 7:52:27 PM by Def Conservative (Screaming "Hillary Clinton!" isn't going to scare me into voting for Huckabee or McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Ron Paul wants to wait for the terrorists to build up and come over here first. Insane is he!


5 posted on 1/22/2008, 7:53:01 PM by LifeOrGoods? (Save the Republican party: Vote Romney!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
My legislation entitled The Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 (HR 3216) makes the surgical strike option available to the President in our mission to capture Bin Laden.

Letters of marque and reprisal have not carried legal force for 150 years.

They have no relevance, and have nothing to do with any "surgical strike" capability as far as the President is concerned.

The two phenomena are completely unrelated.

And the President has already put in place measures that are vastly superior to letters of marque and reprisal, even if letters of marque and reprisal were still valid.

6 posted on 1/22/2008, 7:59:09 PM by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LifeOrGoods?

Aye...

But “The Farce” is strong within him...


7 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:01:56 PM by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Some day it will have to happen, but no one has the guts to do it today.

DECLARE WAR ON ISLAM.

They’ve already declared war on us, since their inception.

You have three choices, as far as they are concerned:
Conversion, Subjugation (Dhimmitude), DIE.

Time to take the threat seriously.


8 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:01:56 PM by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Great, Ron.....how many countries are we going to invade to find one man in a Constitutional “Reprisal”?

What mercenaries shall we grant a Letter of Marquis in order to carry out these multiple invasions?


9 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:02:48 PM by ElectricStrawberry (1/27 Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Seeing as Ron Paul doesn’t seem to know it’s later than 1780, I’m not surprised he would suggest this.


10 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:04:23 PM by flintsilver7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Hear! Hear!


11 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:05:29 PM by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry
Putting aside, of course, the fact that letters of marque and reprisal, if they still were valid, would not be useful on dry land but only on the sea.

How long is Afghanistan's coastline? Waziristan's?

12 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:05:53 PM by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
Sorry to ask, but have you read the US Constitution? Whether I think Ron Paul is sane or not isn't the point of this posting. The Constitution has a solution for Bin Laden and many other ailments, which all political parties and apparently many here don't get. I guarantee that if we unleashed the Articles of Marque upon the problem, the contracted agents would get him or anyone else it short order.

Instead we resort to trillions of dollars of _borrowed_ money to wage conventional warfare against asymetrical leadship structures. This hasn't gotten him.

Perhaps being a Republican or Democrat isn't as important as being a Constitutional American. As for me and my household, we defend the US Constitution aginast all enemies, foreign and domestic. Hence this post...

13 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:06:21 PM by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: veracious
I guarantee that if we unleashed the Articles of Marque upon the problem, the contracted agents would get him or anyone else it short order.

This statement demonstrates that you do not know what letters of marque and reprisal were (the operative word being "were" since they can no longer exist).

14 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:09:00 PM by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7

I guess RP knows just where these guys are!
I believe that if we knew where they were, there’d be a Special Op set in motion to kill them on the QT.


15 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:09:03 PM by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BGHater; Niteranger68; ontap; Def Conservative; LifeOrGoods?; wideawake
There are several flaws in what Paul is saying. First, Letters of Marque existed as a matter of international law when the Constitution was written. It was effectively outlawed by the mid-1850s. The US did not sign the Declaration of Paris of 1856 which outlawed Letters of Marque but it did invoke the Declaration during both the American Civil War and the Spanish American War.

Bottom line, Letters of Marque work only if all parties agree to them. Without such agreement, privateering is simply called piracy. No one has recognized Letters of Marque in one hundred and fifty years.

Second, Paul opposes putting the military or national guard on the border as he claims it is outside their Constitutional role (and voted against using them on the border at least five times, several times after 9/11.) It is easy for him to say that now because it is popular, but he can’t run from his record on this.

16 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:11:00 PM by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Please advise me on what possible legal structure has destroyed something so clearly stated in the US Constitution. Are you aware that it is actually the _supreme_ law of the land and that much of the real _problem_ with US is those citizens who think we live in a democracy where the government can do _whatever_ it wants, as long as >50% of the people or representatives want it.

This is exactly why we're in so much trouble.

Long live the Constitutional Republic, in spite of those who know not what it is...

17 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:11:00 PM by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: veracious
Sorry to ask, but have you read the US Constitution?

Yes, but sometimes I wonder if Paul has considering he ignores subsection 10 of Article 8 which does allow for military action or any other action without the need for a declaration of war in subsection 11 that he often cites.

18 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:13:38 PM by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

RP has some good points and is right about a few things,but what would really help him,,,not being freakin nuts! His ideas seem good for a few things but not for the USA in todays world.


19 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:16:41 PM by coalman (type to slow to be relevant,but I try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
In a baffling move President Bush struck a deal with Saudi King Abdullah in 2005 to allow 21,000 more Saudi young men into the US on student Visas.

If only George W. Nixon were as determined to win the war on terror as Americans who support the war are.

20 posted on 1/22/2008, 8:31:27 PM by Nephi ( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson