From Each According to His Ability... Hillary Clinton's quest for economic justice

Reason ^ | January 23, 2008 | Jacob Sullum

[CodeMasterPhilzar]

"a part of economic justice." ... "a new vision of economic fairness"

In other words ... SOCIALISM! Haven't these idiots gotten through their heads yet? In every country where it has been tried it has failed. Period. I know, they firmly believe that the only reason it has a 100% failure rate is that these other dolts weren't as smart as they are, and that the right people haven't been in charge. BS. Socialism sucks, in any and all forms. Take a hike Hillary.

[Adams]

Generations of union-run, government school indoctrination; teaching everything but what made America great.

If parents who understand American principles don’t teach those principles directly to their kids, in a few more generations those prinicples will be completely lost.

[.cnI redruM]

That might be why I’m not particularly Sociable...

[.cnI redruM]

It makes me glad I’m a civil servant. It will be the ONLY growth industry if we’re dumb enough to elect the witch.

[.cnI redruM]

Just blame the rich. It’s easier and saves you the stress of thinking.

[Skenderbej]

“What’s better than quality? Equality.”

-Michael Scott, The Office

[driftless2]

"Hillary's supporters"

You left out the merely envious-of-what-others-have people who number in the millions. Like many of my Dem friends who start frothing at the mouth about the money professional athletes or entertainers make. They begin spouting stuff about it not being fair that someone else makes more than they do.

I would bet that particular group accounts for the majority of Dem voters. They are mostly angry and dissatisfied with their lot in life. That they have more than ninety-five percent of the people on the planet does not occur to them.

[Gritty]

[SQUID]

Well, that’s my point. You vote on principals, not physical attributes, that very few use as a means to choose a desired candidate.

I have no problem with a woman being president either as long as she is willing to actually stick to the Conservative principals.

[woollyone]

Wesley Mouch in action for social equality

[.cnI redruM]

Tell me about it...
She is an Ayn Rand villian in real life.

[the lastbestlady]

She looks more like a Balph Eubank to me.

[.cnI redruM]

Her husband is Balph. Balph the Malph.

[the lastbestlady]

No doubt! LOL
Ayn Rand definitely had a way with names!

[.cnI redruM]

Her villain names remind me of that chapter of Freakonomics about the awful baby names.

[the lastbestlady]

No kidding.
I always thought the names she came up with for her heroes/heroines were quite good as well.
Oh well. Who is John Galt?

[sinclair]

There are rich Republicans, there are poor Republicans.

There are rich Democrats, there are poor Democrats.

There are rich Socialists, there are poor Socialists.

There are rich Communists, there are poor Communists.

The only difference in these political designations is who leads them and how they go about implementing their philosophies. If you are lucky enough to have a benevolent ruling hierarchy you and yours will prosper. If not, well then you get Hell.

As of the last few election cycles we have been heading in the direction of National Socialism with only a brief respite (the Reagan terms). This trend is made abundantly clear in that there is no longer any pretence at Conservatism anywhere in any of the remaining presidential campaigns.

If you are a God fearing person you may want do some serious praying now as that may be your only hope left. Cause brothers and sisters voting isn't going to change that anytime soon.

[weegee]

As we have seen around the world, the shackles of socialism do not break easily.