RNC chairman provides numbers, strategy to defeat top Democrats

The Hill.com ^ | 01/24/08 12:01 AM [ET] | Sam Youngman

[lunarville]

Nothing to see here folks, move along, move along....

[mad_as_he$$]

Duncan is listening to Rove. Rove is no longer relevant and it is past his time.

Mr. Rove put the phone down and step off into the night. Your time is over. Your abilities have faded and you are now less useful than teats on a boar hog.

[LibLieSlayer]

This ole boy is trying to thread a limp noodle through the eye of a needle.

LLS

[lunarville]

There were times when I thought “Rove the Magnificent Bastard” was just lucky that things turned out the way they did. Maybe he’s not magnificent just a ...., never mind.

[dbacks]

I hate to say it but the only Republican I know of that I would vote for is Rush Limbaugh. And he ain’t interested.

[mad_as_he$$]

I would rather be lucky than good any day.

[lunarville]

“I hate to say it but the only Republican I know of that I would vote for is Rush Limbaugh.”

Can you imagine the moonbat meltdown if he did run.

[princess leah]

We only lose if we get too many “my guy lost, so I’m staying home to teach the GOP a lesson”...Get over that your guy lost, and vote for the Republican that gets the nomination. Then after this year, we need to project a good conservative for 2012...

[lunarville]

touché

[LibLieSlayer]

Rush is a Conservative not necessarily a Republican. He had quite a long monologue about it the other day. He may vote for Republicans but he takes offense at the label. I personally never did feel that way (I was a proud Republican)... my past posts will prove it...but I agree with Rush now.

LLS

[seekthetruth]

“Well, first let’s have candidates that aren’t frickin’ RINOs....”

Would be nice. But of the candidates left, it is wise to choose one whom can beat Hillary or Obama in the general election. I believe that Republican nominee to be Mitt Romney. Notice he made no mention of Mitt Romney, the one who is LESS of a RINO.

[lunarville]

I agree, staying home is not an option.

[rlmorel]

This was a fairly predictable thread...

I got a letter looking up at me from the Republican Party...haven’t decided if I should just feed it straight into the shredder.

[padre35]

I would vote as well, but the “Silent majority” has gotten pretty comfy under GWB, perhaps they have forgotten what the 90’s were like even when we controlled the Congress and Slick Willy was CINC.

That and to be honest, the GOP no longer puts in the work either in Congressional Districts, one volunteer at a time, or up in DC, they still don’t really seem to understand what motivates “us”.

Boehner has at least begun to rebuild us.

[lunarville]

It could be your free “Stop Hillary” fold out poster.

[LibLieSlayer]

It’s not the candidate... it’s not the man... it is what the candidate represents. I mean truly represents, believes in and practices it in his/her daily life. It is not about probabilities and percentages... it is not about putting “r”’s in office... it is about protecting, defending and growing America, by following tried and true Conservative methodology in shaping a limited but strong Federal government. It is ideology over personality... principle over probability... it is these things that motivates core Conservatives.

These are the guidelines by which Reagan lived and governed. Early in his career Reagan made some mistakes by trusting liberals... abortion legislation he signed into law while Governor of California is an example... and he learned early in his first administration that liberals could never be trusted. Tip O'Neil screwed him over by lying about promised spending cuts to offset new taxes Reagan signed in favor of. Reagan learned this important lesson about the honesty and integrity of liberals... but far too many in the Republican Party are blind to the liberalism that they embrace as Conservatism. They cannot see the forest for the trees.

LLS

[AFreeBird]

So you don't think that the money that goes to the RNC has any purpose? That the people controlling that money don't have any influence? Sure the candidates have to raise money. Hell, the NFL requires money from the owners, why should the RNC be any different. But if you think they don't have any say, can't influence other movers and shakers in the media and elsewhere, you're not only delusional, but.. (do I really need to say it?)

Give me a break.

[GraniteStateConservative]

For Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), Duncan says it comes down to trust.

Well, it's a good thing our RINO corps of candidates are so trustworthy, so America can fully appreciate the distinction...

[bluebeak]

yeah ... I would be nice to have a candidate to vote for instead of voting against.

[rlmorel]

"...It could be your free “Stop Hillary” fold out poster..."

Yipppeeee!

Call me a puppet on a string, but...that is an easy button to push.

I drove through Concord, MA (Cradle of Liberty...PAH! What it has become...) this morning on my way to work. There were about 5-7 people with Hillary signs.

Women I expect. There are some women out there (umm...Gennifer Flowers for a stomach-turning example?) who would vote for Hillary because...she is a woman.

But there were three guys out there. What is that? I was completely flummoxed...how high up do you have to get snipped to hold a sign for Hillary?

That was just disturbing.