Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus

Is this what Free Republic is reduced to, an endless, everyday pile of anti-Romney postings by the Mitt haters, just a continuous stream of invective by the truly most despicable bottom feeders amongst us? Is Romney bashing the new and favorite past-time of those with no political acumen whom have bet on the wrong horse and can’t get over it? It appears so. And so folks, here’s yet another distortion of Mitt Romney for your delectation.


9 posted on 01/23/2008 10:03:18 PM PST by flaglady47 (The only one that stands between McQueeg and the Presidency is Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: flaglady47

Cut the drama! If you cannot see past your own drama, then spare the rest of us from your pathetic logic. We can think and research for ourselves..We do not like what we find in Rommney, so get over it.


19 posted on 01/23/2008 10:12:21 PM PST by hope (Isaiah 53 nothing redacted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47
Hey, if you can't take the heat in here, how fast are you going to melt when it's applied with the MSM blow-torch in September?

And so folks, here’s yet another distortion of Mitt Romney for your delectation.

Please explain to me how this one is a distortion. Watch it if you can. I could barely suppress a gag:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4
25 posted on 01/23/2008 10:16:03 PM PST by Antoninus (I survived Roe v. Wade. 40,000,000 of my generation did not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1929107/posts

It seems the people who are for Willard Mitt Romney only
believe what is said now not what he said and did in the past.

59 posted on 01/23/2008 10:31:05 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Rudy,Romney,McCain, Huckabee will send a self-abused stomped elephant to the DRNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47

One can be anti-Romney and not hate him. I have nothing against him as a person, I just do not trust him or his positions. Not every FReeper fits into your category.

You sure do use a lot of purty words, though.


60 posted on 01/23/2008 10:32:04 PM PST by Theresawithanh (Mitt's not IT for me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47; Antoninus

You said — “Is this what Free Republic is reduced to, an endless, everyday pile of anti-Romney postings by the Mitt haters, just a continuous stream of invective by the truly most despicable bottom feeders amongst us?”

Well, I don’t know about the so-called “Mitt haters” — but there is one thing that jumps out at me, immediately. It’s that Mitt is a member of a non-Christian cult group, and that immediately eliminates him from consideration as a Presidential candidate.

For me, this comes down this way on a couple of counts. One thing is that I’m not voting for any Presidential candidate who is a member of a non-Christian cult group. I can’t imagine that the majority of Evangelical Christians will want to vote (either) for a non-Christian cult-group-member. That’s just the way it shakes out for me, to be sure.

And then, secondly, I find that there is a *lot of deception* going on with members of that particular non-Christian cult group — in that most of them try and assert that their church is actually a church that teaches the same thing as “Christianity” does. They try and say this by saying that they (the Mormon Church) is a “Christian church” just like a lot of other Christian churches are.

For those who are not aware of it — this is the biggest lie and deception that you can find — in the religious sphere... The Mormon teachings and doctrines are *so radically different* from basic, historic and foundational Christian teachings and doctrines — that they bear *no resemblance* to each other — not in the least. It takes “books and books” to document how far the Mormon teachings and doctrines are from basic, historic and foundational Christianity — so much so, that they can fill libraries with information documenting this.

And yet, many Mormons persist in trying to deceive people (in the general public) by this kind of lie (that they are actually and simply — “another Christian church” — as if they are simply a separate “denomination”... LOL!)

These are simply the “facts of the matter” and since Romney is part of that kind of “deception” that emanates from that church (in that he’s a member of that church) — it’s very disturbing to see a Presidential candidate be part of that kind of environment.

Now, getting the facts out about Romney and how he’s a member of that non-Christian cult group is important for the voting public. I strongly suspect that not only will a large majority of Evangelical Christians decline to vote for a candidate who is a member of a non-Christian cult group — but also a significant segment of the general public will decline to vote for that candidate, because of the kind of deception that goes on (towards the general and unsuspecting public) from that group. That kind of deception is a very disturbing aspect of being part of that church.

Regards,
Star Traveler


82 posted on 01/23/2008 10:46:13 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47
Is this what Free Republic is reduced to, an endless, everyday pile of anti-Romney postings by the Mitt haters, ...

Every time the Mitt-bots use the tactics of the left by calling those that disagree with them Haters, they automatically lose the argument and paint themselves as fools.
122 posted on 01/23/2008 11:36:48 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47

The homosexual group called the “log” cabin republicans were runing thank you commercials for supporting homosexuals too.

The question really boils down to is what is he going to do now.

The issue is wheter we have a candidates who will ACT on the real concerns of najority main street USA. (that is the conservatives for those in rio linda)

Romney is flipping right at worst.

McCain is still pro-amensty, pro-homosexual marriage (vanity fair article), clueless on business.


169 posted on 01/24/2008 9:27:13 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47
There are none so blind, as he who will not see......

That is a quote, but the author escapes me. Blasting people of integrity, with so much evidence backing them up too. Now that is more closely defined as hate, than those simply trying to be sure voters know what they are voting for.

Seeing to it, or even trying to see to it, that voters are informed does not equal hate.

Maybe the word hate should be banned!! It’s the most overused, taken out of context word in the English language today, rendering it meaningless anyway.

178 posted on 01/24/2008 2:03:17 PM PST by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican! GoHunter.08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47
just a continuous stream of invective by the truly most despicable bottom feeders amongst us?

Uh, Jim Robinson was one of the responses. Is he a bottom-feeder too? Your posting on his website, you know.

182 posted on 01/24/2008 4:43:01 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson