Posted on 01/24/2008 11:16:15 AM PST by WalterSkinner
Well I heard that Duncan Hunter TRIED to have a chat with Romney... did you miss that part? Duncan Hunter from the beginning of this presidential cycle continually brought up our security and a China problem. Did you not hear that???
This is a BS charge and Hunter comes across as petty and dirty.
Obviously you know more than Hunter then, although what exactly I can't discern.
If that's what you're good at......
You know, you Romney haters and that MLK thing make me chuckle with your attempt to demonize.
Romney used a figure of speech that we ALL use every day.
My dad says all the time, "I fought with Patton all across all the way to Berlin."
Well HECK, he wasn't rubbing shoulders with Patton, and probably never even got in sight of the General.
You Romney haters are freaking obsessed.
LOL!!! And you mittbots will excuse away anything, sort of like Clintonites. Amazing. (Was kind of hard to excuse away the NRA endorsement lie though huh?)
Yes, the NRA comment was an exaggeration half-lie on Romney's part which he probably shouldn't have made.
The NRA did donate money to his campaign, and they had NRA members campaigning actively for Romney.
So the word "endorse" was a little strong perhaps. He had previously used the words "the NRA supported my campaign" which was is in fact correct.
But when one is obsessed with hating Romney...you will choose anything within fingertip grasp. Sort of like a thirsty man in the desert.... will latch onto anything that even appears to be wet.
By the way... since you don't have a candidate on the GOP side, are you gonna support Hillary?
Ya think??? (Speaks volumes on his pandering which is a complete turn-off).
I have no clue yet who will get my support. I'm waiting things out praying for a brokered convention. And no Hillary would never get my vote. BUT rhino republicans would be little different than Hillary so don't even go there. The Republican party shot themselves in the foot this election cycle and your question is moot because NO rhino has a prayer of defeating Hillary. So go ahead and vote for the rhino and watch conservatism die. I'll pass, thanks.
Well Romney is even older than Huckabee.
When Romney was Huckabee's age, he was for abortion on demand, government funded abortion, gun control, gay rights, homosexual scoutmasters... in fact he was running to the left of Ted Kennedy.
Huckabee is a lot closer to a conservative now than Romney was when he was Huckabee's age.
You just geve the best recommendation I can think of for voting for Huckabee.
Thanks.
I think it is that some of the Romney supporters (especially the Mormon ones) are freaking obsessed.
I don't like any of the candidates. But the only one who has strong moral convictions that line up with mine is Mike Huckabee.
Romney may pretend to have moral convictions, but it's an act. A bad one at that.
If you notice, this morning, the MSM is still pushing McCain and Huckabee.
It is so obvious.
Makes me ill.
Because Huckabee is a pro-illegal, pro-amnesty, socialist.
Slick Willard - flip floppin' snake oil salesman who'll say anything to get elected.
McCain - RINO in Chief, McCain/Feingold, McCain/Kennedy. 'Nuff said.
Huckster - Another slick liberal gov'nur from Hope, Arkansas who has never seen a tax hike he doesn't like.
RuPaul - This guy is certifiably nuts!
Bye bye Miss GOP American Pie. Drove my chevy to the levy but the levy was dried. Them good ol' boys were drinkin' whiskey and rye, the day Conservatism died. Guess I'll go dig a hole now and hunker down for the next 4 yrs.
***********************
You said it, and much better than I ever could.
That’s the point of choosing a RINO. They’re all pro-illegal, pro-amnesty socialists to some degree. When all is said and done, it appears that the Huckster is the only one who even wants a staunch conservative like Hunter in his administration. What does that tell you about the other RINOs running for president?
I like the results in Louisiana: NOTA for President.
Huckabee’s band has performed twice at inaugural events sponsored by FreeRepublic.com, a right-wing forum known for its extreme views. After 2001’s “Count the White House Silverware Party,” Huckabee posted a message on the forum calling himself a “confirmed and proud Freeper.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1959417/posts
That’s nice, but I’m not voting for him.
I may not vote for him either. But of the 4 clueless RINOs, he seems to be the least clueless. He’s evangelical, pro-life, social conservative, Freeper like Hunter. I was going onto a bunch of Huckabee threads and planting seeds suggesting that if their candidate fizzled, the Hunter camp would have been the natural place for them to settle. Both were evangelical, pro-life. One proceeded from that basis and used religion to explain his liberal political leanings, while the other proceeded from that basis and stayed true to conservative principles. If that were the primary prism through which Hunter viewed the remaining candidates, there’s only one that even comes close — Huckabee.
I won't be voting for him under any circumstance.
Good enough. Regardless of which RINO gets the nod, we will be seeing that sentiment across the board. I know already that I can’t vote for tootyfruityrudy. I haven’t made up my mind about McCainiack nor FlipFlopMitt.
We have no good choices this time around. It’s a shame.
From the last debate, HUCKABEE has a point.
“One of the concerns that I have is that we’ll probably end up borrowing this $150 billion from the Chinese and when we get those rebate checks, most people are going to go out and buy stuff that’s been imported from China. “
China is one of the reasons that Hunter endorsed Huckabee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.