Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Team IDs weakness in anthrax bacteria

Ulysses Spacecraft Flies Over Sun's North Pole

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

2 posted on 01/24/2008 11:59:06 PM PST by neverdem (I have to hope for a brokered GOP Convention. It can't get any worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem; SunkenCiv
It will be interesting to determine the smallest genome (in genes and in base pairs) that is required for different types of microorganisms.

According to this http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/G/GenomeSizes.html

Venter assumes that 381 protein encoding genes are required for Mycoplasma genitalium.

and that the smallest genome yet found in a free-living organism is Pelagibacter ubique with 1,308,759base pairs and 1,354 genes.

However, the tiniest genomes ever found belong to two types of bacteria that live inside insects. One of these types of bacteria, Carsonella ruddii, is so small that it could perhaps be considered an organelle within the cells of the bugs. But both microbe species face the threat of extinction because of their small genome size.

C. ruddii has the fewest genes of any cell known in the world - a mere 182, according to the new results.
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/genetics/dn10259-bacteria-boast-the-tiniest-genomes-to-date.html

I just found this http://genomicron.blogspot.com/2007/06/some-big-and-small-genomes.html informative web page.

and this http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/databases/DOGS/index.php for genome sizes

4 posted on 01/25/2008 1:02:15 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson