Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

I’d say your prediction is correct...

People willing to vote for anyone in opposition to any democrat will number 37% to maybe as much as even 45% of the popular vote.

The RINOs have a better chance against Hillary than against Obama I’m afraid. And I consider Obama to be the more dangerous of the two.


59 posted on 01/29/2008 10:43:44 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: PlainOleAmerican

The positive in Obama’s favor is because he is an unknown quantity, he could get a lot more votes. Because Hillary is so well-known and the fact that almost nobody doesn’t have an opinion (positive or negative), she is instantly polarizing. A lot of Dems recognize that and think going with empty-suit Obama is a better bet.

And, yes, you’re right, he is more dangerous. He is either the most or tied for being the most extreme-left Senators. We know the kind of criminality Hillary will engage in, but we have no idea what Obama is likely to do.


63 posted on 01/29/2008 10:53:47 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson