To: bd476
I almost bought into the argument that we’re better off staying home and letting the Democrats win the White House in 2008 so that the Republicans can put a true conservative in the White House in 2012.
But I’ve come to the conclusion that the Clinton corruption machine must be stopped at all costs.
3 posted on
01/30/2008 8:24:28 PM PST by
bw17
To: bw17
bw17 wrote: "I almost bought into the argument that we’re better off staying home and letting the Democrats win the White House in 2008 so that the Republicans can put a true conservative in the White House in 2012.
But I’ve come to the conclusion that the Clinton corruption machine must be stopped at all costs."
Agree, but it's still a dilemma. It feels like our choice has been removed.
6 posted on
01/30/2008 8:29:10 PM PST by
bd476
To: bw17; advertising guy; rodguy911; SE Mom; Lancey Howard; Southack; backhoe; Enchante; kristinn; ...
WHOO BOY!
Your words are coming true, ad guy ... tick, tick, tick
10 posted on
01/30/2008 8:37:21 PM PST by
STARWISE
(They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: bw17
But Ive come to the conclusion that the Clinton corruption machine must be stopped at all costs.
&&&&&
Our world of satellite communication, and private MD87s, and cellphone computers is a very different world from Jimmy Carter’s 1976. Four years of Clintons will cause irreparable change and harm to our country. We will become another Venezuela politically.
69 posted on
01/31/2008 3:23:31 AM PST by
maica
(Romney '08)
To: bw17
But Ive come to the conclusion that the Clinton corruption machine must be stopped at all costs. I'm reaching the conclusion she could probably be impeached in the year of office.
95 posted on
01/31/2008 6:46:42 AM PST by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: bw17
Some don’t realize that, if she wins in 2008, she will have a landslide in 2012. She will stack the deck for the next election. It will begin with destroying talk radio. She will remove one of the FCC commissioners, put in her hack, and put the fairness doctrine into operation. The Congress will have no debate and no role. She will then take on censoring political hate speech on the Internet.
No, folks, this is not like 1976 when Carter ultimately set the stage for Reagan. This will have no historical comparison. Hillary Clinton is a neo-Stalinist and will be changing all the rules for political advantage for herself and the Dems. We will see executive orders as we have never before seen.
96 posted on
01/31/2008 7:13:18 AM PST by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: bw17
For years Rush would say “you never win by losing.”
He was right, regardless whether he somehow “evolves” from that in this election.
117 posted on
01/31/2008 9:50:58 AM PST by
fightinJAG
("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
To: bw17
While you’re dusting off your vote to stop this type of activity, perhaps you could tell us what president this took place under? Did that president stop it?
Put that vote away and quit being played like a two week old violin.
125 posted on
01/31/2008 10:18:56 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(PARTY WANTED: Full Time, Cons exp a must. Refs 20 yrs. No Amnesty sptrs. 1 vote per 4 yrs negotiable)
To: bw17
It’s one thing to let Obama win. Its a whole nuther ball game to let Hillary anywhere near the White House. If she is on that ticket at all, I’m voting straight ticket Rep
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson