[Jim Noble]

I'm posting this story for one reason only - to expose the reasoning of this "judge" who uses low IQ and childhood deprivation to support an argument that this obviously dangerous person should not be detained.

These two facts about this criminal - that he is stupid and that he has had a hard life - have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the issue in front of the "judge", which is, does he meet the criteria of the law for detention.

How many judges like this are there on the bench? What sort of executives appoint them? And how can they be removed?

By the way, this is an excerpt - the main body says he was appointed by Jane Swift (R) before Mitt was in office, in case you were wondering.

[SWAMPSNIPER]

He should never walk free.

[ARE SOLE]

A lawyer in a dress allowed this boy to be raped. he should at least find another job where his failures do not endanger children.

Regards

[FormerACLUmember]

How does one impeach a democrat party monster like Richard Moses?

[jwparkerjr]

Part of the judge’s ruling was based on the fact that “had not committed any major sexual offense while he was in prison”. What bogus reasoning!!!! Of course he didn’t offend in prison, those aren’t ‘his type’.

This judge has clearly shown to be just to stupid to be a judge. In fact, with that sort of mental problem I’m not sure just what job he would be qualified to hold.

[Perseverando]

The perp should be placed under house arrest . . . . in the house of this liberal judge for an indefinite period of time.

[Old Grumpy]

” . . . had not committed any major sexual offense while he was in prison.”

What???

[Hemingway's Ghost]

If you had not posted this story this morning, I would have posted it. This bears repeating:

"Moses, who was appointed in December 2002, during the waning days of Jane Swift's acting governorship . . .

This means that he was undoubtedly a hack appointment.

BEWARE OF RINOS!

[happinesswithoutpeace]

bkmarking for tonight. Thanks for the post.

[Albion Wilde]

Thank you, Jim Noble. Here is how you write or call THE JUDGE'S BOSS:

Honorable Barbara J. Rouse
Chief Justice of the Superior Court
Superior Court Administrative Office
Suffolk County Courthouse, 13th Floor
Three Pemberton Square
Boston, MA 02108
617-788-8130

And here is how you CALL OR WRITE THE JUDGE, or copy him on what you wrote to his boss:

Honorable Richard T. Moses
Superior Court
U.S. Post Office & Courthouse
15th Floor
90 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
617-788-8130

I'm pinging all of you who responded to earlier threads on this Forum about child rape in libraries as a result of the ACLU's ludicrous suit to permit the viewing of porn on library computers. Please take a moment to call or write your protest of this judge's lax enforcement to his superior, and also to the Governor of Massachusetts, Deval Patrick:

Massachusetts State House
Office of the Governor
Room 360
Boston, MA 02133
Phone: 617.725.4005, in state: 888.870.7770
Email form click here

Please be respectful, and please ping your FRiends.

[Albion Wilde]

Former threads on this topic:

Offender Accused of Boy's Library Rape

Authorities slam release of accused [library rapist] despite rough childhood [New Bedford, Mass]

Police arrest homeless sex offender in library [Des Moines]

Sex Offender Busted In Racine (WI) Library

Man Accused Of Watching Child Porn At Library [Marshfield, Mass]

[RabidBartender]

This bleeding-heart judge needs to be held accountable. If I were this boy’s father, he would be.

[RabidBartender]

I don’t know if this topic fits into any of ya’lls ping lists - it appears we don’t have a category for “Really Bad Judges”.

[CastleMan95]

I’ve always thought the Sex Offender registry was a stupid idea. Level 3 sex offenders shouldn’t be out of prison if they are still dangerous...thus no need for the registry. I also have learned of Level 3 Sex Offender in Massachusetts who has recently won a big prize in the Mass State Lottery. News around here hasn’t picked on that one yet other than a few comments on a local newspaper Internet comment board.

[TASMANIANRED]

One of the reason’s he had no sex offences in prison is because there aren’t any kids in there.

Judge needs to be second in line to be hung.

[metmom]

This is why child rapists should fry.

[Henchster]

Superior Court Judge Richard Moses..

..Needs to be disbarred, removed from the bench, and sued by the parents.

As much as I hate the "Sue" mentality of this nation, it is only with this type of action that judges will start protecting CITIZENS, instead of CRIMINALS.

[Tulsa Ramjet]

Richard T. Moses
Address: 50 Homers Wharf
New Bedford, MA 02740-7245
Phone: (508) 999-6414

must be a firm’s address

[plan2succeed.org]

There is the possibility this never would have happened had the library not refused to filter the Internet. And notice the media are silent on this possibility.

Here is a letter I wrote to the community:

Dear City Council President Jane L. Gonsalves,

The library rape of a six year old children is criminal. At this time, all efforts are concentrated on the victim and the criminal. But you are the city's leader. You have a responsibility to see the bigger picture. In this case, the bigger picture is this type of incident might happen again and again as a direct result of the library's "anything goes" Internet use policy.

Was the criminal using the Internet before the rape to view child p*rnography? The media did not address this. If he did, did the library attempt to stop him? The media did not address this. If not, why not? The media did not address this, but the answer is on the library's own web site, "The New Bedford Free Public Library only provides access to the Internet. The Library cannot control and is not able to monitor any information on the Internet for either content or accuracy." http://www.ci.new-bedford.ma.us/Library/internetpolicy.html

Did you know that is false? Did you know communities may filter all computers and the US Supreme Court has already found that constitutional? Did you know the ACLU and the courts have found filters so effective that they no longer block out health related web sites?

Worse, it is possible your library's policy has exposed it, its employees, and New Bedford to liability for failure to take action that might have prevented the child rape in the first place. A simple reading of the library policy tells me the child's rape was likely partially the responsibility of the library for having an anything goes policy and the community for failure to control its own library in the legal manner in which it may control its library. Indeed, I urge any legal action brought by the parents to include counts against the library and especially against the city for, among other things, a likely failure to enforce the library's enabling statute that I am sure does not say anything goes. Indeed I will actively attempt to contact the family's attorneys and advise them to consider the theory of liability I have outlined generally.

I thought you should consider this. You have the power to prevent future such instances by using every means possible to get your local library to apply filters to all Internet computers. Warning, the American Library Association is responsible for these anything goes policies, is specifically named by your library as its source for library policy, and will be sure to bring the full weight of its misinformation campaign to you if you do decide to protect your community's children instead of the ALA's policies.

Articles I am reading show the city is obviously thinking of ways to prevent this in the future, but all I see are methods of moving the deck chairs on the Titanic. For example, "privacy screens" do not function as claimed. Internet filters are the most effective means to resolve the situation, and that is precisely why the ALA attempts to convince people not to use them.

I will be happy to explain and source every statement I have made here. You have the legal means to remove the negative influence of the ALA from your library. It's a PUBLIC library, not an ALA library. Please let me know if I may assist.

SafeLibraries.org - Are Children Safe in Public Libraries?

[Marysecretary]

We do have too many judges freeing these criminals. I hope his grandson isn’t next!

[endthematrix]

"The judge said Saunders...had not committed any major sexual offense while he was in prison... he was not dangerous."

WTF?