Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bizarre Bedfellows for Barack. Conservatives and Liberals Rally Behind an Unqualified Candidate
City Journal ^ | Feb. 4, '08 | Fred Siegel

Posted on 02/04/2008 10:22:23 PM PST by T.L.Sink

Team Obama has the ball - and the momentum. Obama has drawn praise from from the New York Post and from numerous conservative heavyweights, including former Reagan speechwriter Jeffrey Hart, National Review editor Rich Lowry, former education secretary and radio host Bill Bennett, and former Bush aide Peter Wehner. Obama's achievements are largely proleptic: words aren't deeds. And while he has few concrete achievements to his name, he does have a voting record that hardly suggests an ability to rise above Left and Right. After his first two years in the Senate, National Journal's analysis of roll call votes found that he was more liberal than 86 percent of his colleagues, and his voting record has grown more liberal since then. The liberal ADA now gives him a 97.5 rating, while National Journal ranks him the most liberal member of the Senate. In the recent Hollywood debate, he insisted, contrary to the evidence, that the problem with American education was that it was underfunded. But education funding has increased dramatically over the last 20 years to no good effect, as student performance on content-based tests continues to decline. In the same debate, Obama at first waffled in response to an African-American womsn's question about the effect of illegal immigration on working class wages. But finally, he insisted that complaining about the effects of illegal immigrants on working-class wages and neighborhoods was a form of "scapegoating."

(Excerpt) Read more at city-journal.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: barackhusseinobama; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Siegel concludes with the following: "People are entitled to know why a man who has never been to Iraq and who, aside from a brief trip to London, has barely been abroad as an adult is ready to guide us internationally. He has deep faith in the UN and the leaders of Islamic nations to discuss ways to "bridge the gap between us." Obama, who never refers to anything so clear-cut as radical Islam or jihadism, says that he 'wants to ask them to join our fight against terrorism.' When violence broke out in Kenya, he referred to his Kenyan grandmother as proof of his foreign-policy credentials, but failed to mention the tribalism - endemic to much of the African and Islamic world - that had produced a string of massacres." It seems there's now a contest among Republicans and conservative commentators to see who can be most obsequious and sycophantic over this grossly underqualified candidate. Are they afraid of falling victim to the race card?
1 posted on 02/04/2008 10:22:27 PM PST by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
“Obama has drawn praise from from the New York Post and from numerous conservative heavyweights, including former Reagan speech writer Jeffrey Hart, National Review editor Rich Lowry, former education secretary and radio host Bill Bennett, and former Bush aide Peter Wehner.”

Maybe, but I don’t know who Jeffrey Hart and Peter Wehner are, and I’m pretty sure Bennet and Lowry won’t be voting for Obama.

2 posted on 02/04/2008 10:31:12 PM PST by Moral Hazard (Vote Huckabe. He'd make a lousy president, but we might get a brokered convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
Are they afraid of falling victim to the race card?

I wouldn't vote for my own mother if she had the qualifications and beliefs of Obama. But I expect to be accused by the left of being a racist for refusing to consider voting for him despite the fact my reasons have nothing to do with race. The race card will be played no matter what if Obama wins the the nomination.

3 posted on 02/04/2008 10:47:13 PM PST by GATOR NAVY (Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moral Hazard

Hell, I have praised Obama my self. But my praise for him has been exclusively in the arena of his oratory skills and ability to rhetorically stun audiences into forgetting that he isn’t actually saying anything.

Remember when there was a term called ‘political doublespeak’ or ‘talking loud and saying nothing’? Obama needs his own saying like ‘inspiring the masses to do nothing in particular’ or ‘saying so eloquently so much and conveying so little’.

Actually, Obama reminds me of Oprah. Think about this. Oprah is amazingly famous and has a Svengali-like following of women(mostly) who hang on her every word. Yet nobody you ask could actually tell you what it is that Oprah really believes in. What religion does she practice? What does she think happens to you when you die? Does Oprah believe that tax increases create or suppress economic activity? Hell, what brand of hair spray does Oprah like the most?

Oprah talks about virtually everything but she rarely if ever takes an actual position on anything which has two sides. If she talks to a guy who believes that upbringing causes your sexual orientation, she is fascinated and acts as though she agrees. Next week, she has someone on her show who proclaims that it is a scientific fact that sexual orientation is genetic and Oprah says ‘I’ve heard that from many people’. But after both shows, you really don’t know which one Oprah herself thinks is true.

When we are talking about fashion or what your dreams mean or feng shui, its easy to not have a firm opinion since there is no right/wrong answer. But what about partial birth abortion? The Estate Tax? Jessicas Law? Nobody knows. Her viewers, readers and sychophants certainly don’t. They have a general feel of what she thinks but not about virtually any real issue which is politically contested.

Obama votes like a McGovern/Feingold/Bernie Sanders socialist but he talks like a guy who is charging $25,000 an evening at corporate retreats as a motivational speaker. Obama has yet to do anything that any garden variety motivational speaker doesn’t do every day on the job. They inspire, they excite and they provide a host of catchy phrases like “If you believe you can or you believe you can’t, you are right” which sound deep and profound but are intellectual cotton candy.

It would be a fascinating experience to have a US President in office who has absolutely no affiliations to anybody in business, politics or any other organizations and no policy plans. There are somewhere around 100,000 Federal employees who would be taking direction from a guy who doesn’t know who or where they are and what they do.


4 posted on 02/04/2008 10:48:39 PM PST by bpjam (I'll crawl over broken glass to vote against McCain (or the Huck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

I have a question :

If Obama is Pres can he unilaterally order our troops back from Iraq ? Does the Congess have a role?


5 posted on 02/04/2008 10:50:54 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink
For some reason, driving home tonight I was thinking of watching a match-up between Obama and Romney. That would be a genuine ideological contest.

If it's McCain v. Clinton it's a fight for the middle. Clinton must go down.

6 posted on 02/04/2008 10:51:30 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Good question. As commander in chief with a Democrat house behind him...why not?


7 posted on 02/04/2008 10:52:37 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

That’s not a rally, that’s a counter-protest you see...


8 posted on 02/04/2008 10:52:48 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bpjam

Good post.

While Obama’s oratory style is certainly skilled and impressive, the content of his words amount to verbal cotton candy.


9 posted on 02/04/2008 10:57:42 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: woofie
“If Obama is Pres can he unilaterally order our troops back from Iraq ? Does the Congess have a role?”

Yes and no. I can’t think of anything Congress could do to force a president to fight a war that wouldn’t constitute a separation of powers violation. Of course given the current state of the supreme court and their disregard for separation of powers that might not matter.

10 posted on 02/04/2008 11:00:23 PM PST by Moral Hazard (Vote Huckabe. He'd make a lousy president, but we might get a brokered convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
Exactly. I have often thought the same. Hope we get a chance to have the former and not the latter. (the latter of course not being "Clinton must go down", but McCain v. Clinton for the middle).
11 posted on 02/04/2008 11:07:16 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bpjam
Osama Obama is saying something its called a pot smoking , illegal alien haven socialist nightmare nation.
Just because someone is given a compliment, lets not read too much into it. As usual ,the liberal media overreaches and reads so much into so little.

Can someone name one thing Osama Obama has ever accomplished outside of being a black dem candidate ?
The power of the media to make something out of literally nothing is amazing. Herr Goebbels would be impressed by todays socialist media Obama propaganda campaign.

12 posted on 02/04/2008 11:13:53 PM PST by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

As a white guy there is no way that I am praising Obama. Look what happened when Joe Biden tried to compliment the guy. He was accused of being insensitive and politically incorrect. If Biden can’t parse his words to stay out of trouble, then I am sure I couldn’t either.


13 posted on 02/04/2008 11:17:30 PM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

The guy supports partial birth abortion and voted against medical support for infants who survived abortion.

That’s all I need to know about his character.

He’s scum, no matter how well he speaks.


14 posted on 02/05/2008 3:27:32 AM PST by Caravaggio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bpjam
There are somewhere around 100,000 Federal employees who would be taking direction from a guy who doesn’t know who or where they are and what they do.

Not to mention a million and a half or so professional soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines scattered all over the world. Fascinating perhaps, but not pretty.

You're a good writer. I've read op eds by really famous people lately that didn't make anywhere near that much sense.

15 posted on 02/05/2008 3:41:29 AM PST by athelass (Proud Mom of a Sailor and two Marines! McCain is to conservatism as Hillary is to Playboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

A president barak HUSSEIN obama would truly be frightening. Under the real possibility of a nuclear threat, which button would he push - YES NO PRESENT? - How many live aborted children would be denied life support? When would American companies be nationalized? Very unsettling!


16 posted on 02/05/2008 3:41:50 AM PST by yorkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: woofie
If Obama is Pres can he unilaterally order our troops back from Iraq ? Does the Congess have a role?

Theoretically, yes. The big issue would be whether he has the funding available to do so. Getting the troops home wouldn't cost that much (relatively speaking). Getting their equipment home is another matter entirely ... and the military (and the Republicans) would go absolutely apesh*t if he ordered them to abandon functioning M1s, M2/3s and Strykers in the numbers we have deployed in Iraq.

My belief would be that Obama would be "counseled" by Dem elders not to even think of trying to do something like that. They recall all too well what happened to Bill Clinton in 1993 and 94 when he created the appearance that he was d*cking with the military. Unlike Hillary!, Obama, I think, would be inclined to listen.

Starting with the hypothesis (this is just a hypothesis) that a Democrat *will* win in November, it's much better to have unqualified Obama win than it is to have Hillary! show up on 1/20/09 with her existing "shadow government" all prefabricated and ready to drop into place.
17 posted on 02/05/2008 3:46:29 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: T.L.Sink

Nearly anything to derail the Klintons.


18 posted on 02/05/2008 3:49:06 AM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

“If Obama is Pres can he unilaterally order our troops back from Iraq ? Does the Congess have a role?”

Regardless of whether he could or could not, it would certainly be within his powers as CIC to confine US troops to base suspending all combat operations and essentially reaching the same end.


19 posted on 02/05/2008 3:53:50 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul - building a bridge to the 19th century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bpjam

“Oprah talks about virtually everything but she rarely if ever takes an actual position on anything which has two sides. If she talks to a guy who believes that upbringing causes your sexual orientation, she is fascinated and acts as though she agrees. Next week, she has someone on her show who proclaims that it is a scientific fact that sexual orientation is genetic and Oprah says ‘I’ve heard that from many people’....”

Analogy: Reminds me of a scene in an episode of “Frasier” I happened to see the other night as I passed through the Den and my wife was watching television. His brother Nigel’s “Date” was “fascinated”, and so “Interested” by everything about him, and “Frasier” took Nigel into the kitchen and was explaining the “Singles Match Service” in which Nigel had met his “Date” was actually an “Escort Service”. It was quite humorous, but the point is the parallel to Oprah’s “fascination and Interest” without any commitment to “Position”, nor substance. She seems quite “Generic”.

One size fits all sort of a thing.

There is no doubt she has become quite wealthy with this sort of vapid format.


20 posted on 02/05/2008 4:13:41 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson