Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Of course, the gay marriage amendment would even have been necessary if Willard Romney had done was was necessary to stop gay marriage in Massachusetts.


10 posted on 02/05/2008 9:44:28 AM PST by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky

> Willard Romney had done was was necessary to stop gay
> marriage in Massachusetts.

And what, pray tell, was that?

Gay marriage legislation was passed from the BENCH, by a JUDGE who happens to be married to the editor-in-chief of the flaming liberal rag, the Boston Globe.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court agreed with the judge that “Gay Marriage” was a constitutional right, in spite of the effort mounted by Mitt Romney for the opposition in court.

The fix was in. Everybody knew how the Mass. Supreme Court would decide.

The Mass. Legislature would not even allow a Marriage Ammendment to the Mass. Constitution to go to the voters as a Referendum. Hundreds of thousands of signatures were gathered in support of the Marriage Ammendment Referendum.

But the Mass. State Legislature knows what’s best for the little people.


19 posted on 02/06/2008 4:12:19 AM PST by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson