Posted on 02/05/2008 9:03:44 PM PST by dangus
Looks like McCain is up about 2-3%. He leads among men, 41-35. Romney leads among women, 38-34. Here's how stupid Californians are: Giuliani is getting about 5%.
This is NOT a winner-take-all state. Rather, it's like 53 separate elections, one in each congressional district. What's outrageous is that some districts have 20 times more Republicans than others. My fear is that McCain will win these. Either way, the battle will last for months to come.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
I goofed: I used CNN for the source of the link, but I named USA Today. Can you fix that?
A big problem in California is that early absentee ballots began on Jan 7.
I’d very surprised if Romney wins California. He’s been smoked all over the country tonight.
It looks like it’s time to shift gears and get behind Huckabee.
Romney has a good chance to win in AK.
CA will be the big prize. Early votes are absentees (military votes?) giving McCain an early lead. Be hilarious to see Romney tie McCain in number of states carried.
Is that the reason why McLame is up so much in CA?
So your saying Huckabee won more delegates than Romney?
I could go either way, as long as it ain’t McScumbag. But, umm, Romney has carried six states, already.
Those who like RINO Arnold like RINO McCain. Those who don't like Romney.
There are a lot of angry conservatives tonight who were denied their third choice.
For all Romney's faults, he's shown himself to be a man of class and decency who doesn't delight in pi**ing on the base. He's also shown he can organize, raise money and compete.
A third party candidacy could result in a deadlocked election where McCain-Huckabee would have to make meaningful concessions to win. At the very least, it would give conservatives someone to show up and vote for at the top of the ticket to save conservatives down ticket.
Hardly. He wasn’t supposed to win the South anyway, it’s just McCain won less than Huckabee, which wasn’t projected. West Virginia was a definate loss, and Missouri you could consider too.
BTTT to watch.
I heard about 40% were early votes, 60% turned out today.
Exit polls show Romney ahead on turnout today, but McCain for early voting.
But most of the delegates are assigned by congressional district, so we really need to know the district-by-district numbers.
Becareful.... 10.8% of Freepers voted for Fred Thompson today.
Gosh, it’s really sad that the military supports a traitor.
The Guiliani votes are most likely absentee ballots. But you probably knew that, right, dangus? Real clear politics has McCain way up right now in CA. And Hillary, too. Go Hillary!
I could hold my nose and vote for McCain. I could not vote for Huckabee — I remember Jimmy Carter all too well, and Huckabee has all of Carter’s faults/naivete/ignorance without his virtues. (well, he didn’t have any, but....)
But come to think of it, it makes sense... Why else are there so many votes for Giuliani?
Lets hope absentees skewed early results.
“10.8% of Freepers voted for Fred Thompson today.”
As a frmr FredHead I say they should get over it.
Fox News just called it for McCain and Billary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.