Posted on 2/9/2008, 3:16:28 AM by TigerLikesRooster
Hedge funds flex political muscle in election
Fri Feb 8, 2008 2:19pm EST
By Svea Herbst-Bayliss
BOSTON (Reuters) - Hedge fund managers Ken Griffin and Dan Loeb are backing Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama, while Thomas Steyer and Marc Lasry are betting on his rival, Hillary Clinton.
Prominent New York hedge fund managers Louis and Zack Bacon have put some of their money on Republican front-runner John McCain, the senator from Arizona.
As the battle for the White House heats up, the fast-growing $2 trillion hedge fund industry is flexing its political muscle and could play a crucial role in the race for campaign cash in the costliest U.S. election ever.
So far, Democrats look to benefit most.
Hedge funds -- large, loosely regulated pools of investment capital -- gave more generously to Democrats than Republicans in the 2004 presidential elections and in the 2006 congressional races that swept Democrats into a majority in U.S. Congress, according to campaign finance data.
This trend has continued in 2008. Already in the 2008 election cycle, hedge funds have favored Democrats three to one over Republicans, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan campaign finance research group.
Industry analysts, lawyers and managers say Clinton may have an edge over Obama in a fierce battle for their cash.
"I think hedge funds feel more comfortable with Hillary, who comes from a standpoint of raising money from New York financial institutions," said Columbia Law School professor and securities industry expert John Coffee.
"Obama talks about change and when you are a hedge fund, you don't want any change to the ground rules."
Hedge fund industry analysts said Clinton, a New York senator, has already developed a relationship with the once-secretive industry, which is becoming more comfortable in pushing certain political agendas.
"Many hedge fund managers are very socially minded people and they believe their wealth can make a difference in the world," said Denise Valentine, who focuses on hedge funds at financial consulting firm Aite Group.
"They especially want to make changes in health care and education, and those causes dovetail nicely with Hillary Clinton," she added.
RISING DONATIONS
Last year hedge funds donated $3.2 billion to presidential candidates, more than twice the amount they gave in 2000.
Clinton took in $681,250. Steyer's Farallon Capital Management contributed $120,100 and Lasry's Avenue Capital Group, which also hired Clinton's daughter Chelsea, chipped in
$80,700.
Only Democratic Connecticut Sen. Christopher Dodd took in more than Clinton, raising $750,350. While that is a huge amount for an underdog presidential candidate, it is no surprise considering Dodd represents the hedge fund industry's unofficial home state and chairs the Senate Banking Committee.
Dodd dropped out of the race on January 3.
Among Republicans, John McCain raised $116,550 from hedge funds. The Bacon brothers' Moore Capital Capital Management donated $27,550.
But Moore Capital also likes Illinois Sen. Obama, who raised $552,374.
Obama has relied heavily on Ken Griffin's Chicago-based Citadel Investment Group, which put in $171,798. Moore Capital donated $22,700 to Obama while giving just $5,100 to Clinton.
While Obama's call for change might resonate with voters, it could frighten hedge fund managers, who hope Congress won't touch the current generous tax legislation and regulations for hedge and private equity funds.
Set up as partnerships, many hedge funds pay only a 15 percent capital gains tax, which some Democratic lawmakers may want to raise to the 35 percent that many corporations now pay.
"New legislation could potentially impede hedge funds' ability to invest with the freedom they are used to, and so many of them are becoming more politically involved to make sure that doesn't happen," said Adam Sussman, a senior analyst at TABB Group of financial consultants.
"People agree that Hillary is pro-business and that she's not coming down hard on us. With Obama, we aren't so sure yet," said a Boston-based hedge fund manager who asked not to be identified.
With Dodd and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani -- a Republican who raised $678,300 from hedge funds last year -- out of the race, there may now be a scramble to lay claim to their donors, industry analysts said.
"Some sources of money could dry up for a while," said Massie Ritsch, a spokesman for the Center for Responsive Politics. But hedge fund firms could also become energized and back their bosses' new favorite candidates.
Large firms could play an especially powerful role. While federal finance laws limit personal contributions to $2,100, big firms potentially have hundreds of employees to make those contributions.
"Big hedge fund managers often have a favorite candidate, and we've seen that at some of these firms employees saw good reason to support the boss's choice," Ritsch said.
(Editing by Gerald E. McCormick)
Ping!
Fiscal types who go for the Dems are effing fools ...
On the contrary, they are buying influence.
Those folks do not want the little things like national security to get in the way of their profit-making. Besides, they can always count on Dem politicians to cut them a large slack in terms of favorable government policy when they need it. Hitlery and Bill always did that for them.
Which hedge fund is it that Chelsea works for...when she’s not campaigning for her mother, that is? She reportedly was earning $125,000 after being out of college a couple of years.
Hedge Funds.
With a Democrat in the White House , they’ll become the next Enron.
My understanding is that Chelsea won a STARTING salary of over $115k annual, and that was rriiiiight out of Stanford. Like 2 weeks after graduation, or something.
3.2 Billion? Surely not...
sort of like the maifia...
the elite do well with Rats....that is why I hate the Rats...they are liars and hypocrites....
some think that's a foregone conclusion no matter what's in the white house.
but what becomes of the mess they make does depend on what's in the white house.
We all know that the DemocRats have become the party of the super rich. Hard working middle class americans and small business men suffer under DemocRat controls, but the hedge funds are buying influence.
We all know that the DemocRats have become the party of the super rich. Hard working middle class americans and small business men suffer under DemocRat controls, but the hedge funds are buying influence.
I hear you.
I hear you.
"They especially want to make changes in health care and education, and those causes dovetail nicely with Hillary Clinton," she added.
But are the hedge fund managers willing to pay for it by sharing _their_ wealth?
Apparently not: "Private equity funds, however, typically invest on a longer horizon, with the result that income earned by the funds is long-term capital gain, taxable to individuals at a maximum 15% rate. Because the 20% profits share typically is the bulk of the manager’s compensation, and because this compensation can reach, in the case of the most successful funds, enormous figures, concern has been raised, both in Congress and in the media, that managers are taking advantage of tax loopholes to receive what is effectively a salary without paying the ordinary 35% marginal income tax rates that an average person would have to pay on such income."
In other words, these 'socially minded' high-fliers are excepting you, the high-income professional or small-business owner, to pay for the 'sharing' their high ideals demand.
Harry Reid had this to say on the matter in June '07:
"The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, is open to considering legislation that would raise taxes on hedge funds and private equity firms."
However, when there was an actual vote on this in the Senate, Reid voted to retain capital gains treatment for hedge funds.
Before anyone suggests I'm playing the 'class warfare' card here, the only thing I oppose is favoring some classes of high-income earners over the others.
Isn’t that nice salary a direct result of her mom ‘pimping her out in some strange way’??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.