To: PubliusMM
“A whole lot of $hit stops if these idiots are more focused on feeding themselves than killing off Isaelis...”
Good logic, but those people wouldn’t know logic if it tripped them. They’re version of logic is a bit more primitive.
If they’re starving, it’s the Israelis fault and the only solution is to kill Israelis.
If they’re not starving, they don’t have enough land and it’s the Israelis fault and the only solution is to kill Israelis.
10 posted on
02/09/2008 4:14:08 PM PST by
Laptop_Ron
(McCain/Kennedy--Shouldn't we have at least gotten dinner and a movie first?)
To: Laptop_Ron; PubliusMM; eleni121; Recon Dad; Brilliant
I freely admit I don't understand this position.
I'm one of the few people here who supported the Gaza withdrawl, though certainly not the way it was effected, and I'm supportive of foreign aid, but yes as GWB proposed in his first year in office and immediately forgot, with lots of strings.
I'd support aid to the palestinians if conditioned on a cessation of incitement in the schools and media, and a crackdown on terror. Not much to ask, they agreed to that 15 years ago.
To ship the weapons, freestyle.
Is no one at home in the adminstration?
12 posted on
02/09/2008 4:25:02 PM PST by
SJackson
(If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
To: Laptop_Ron
Who do the Palestinians need to protect themselves from? Certainly not Israel who is willing to let them become a state. The other Arab nations in the area? not likely. Themselves? i.e. Hamas? That sounds stupid doesn’t it. The people involved in this quest for a Palestinian State have been at it so long that they can not look outside the process and see what it has devolved into. Now they say they need billions to protect themselves from themselves, sounds like a fool's game to me.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson