With her medical history and the stated facts in the incident report, I find it hard to believe that Mr. Rosenman arrived at his stated “theory” unless he was only pushing a personal agenda and/or utilizing this “study” to justify and support his CDC grant, and to further future grant applications. How he can be called a scientist is beyond me.
To be honest I wonder if they still teach the difference between fact and theory in school. So many theories are published in peer review journals, then picked up by journalists and legislators with political agendas and reported as factual to the public.
The average reader who does not reasearch articles such as this one would never have known that this was not a recent incident. Could you tell by reading the article?
“The average reader who does not reasearch articles such as this one would never have known that this was not a recent incident. Could you tell by reading the article?”
No, I couldn’t.
And the average reader isn’t going to take the time to look into the matter and dig up more info.
We are a society of sound bites, and those with an agenda know it.
“The average reader who does not reasearch articles such as this one would never have known that this was not a recent incident. Could you tell by reading the article?”
No, I couldn’t.
And the average reader isn’t going to take the time to look into the matter and dig up more info.
We are a society of sound bites, and those with an agenda know it.