Posted on 02/11/2008 7:58:47 AM PST by TinaJeannes
The Republican Party has been running presidential candidates since 1856. In all that time, it has never elected one who failed to carry Ohio. Even today, the party's strategists cannot construct a realistic blueprint for winning 270 electoral votes without picking up 20 here.
Because neither the Democrats nor the Republicans enjoy majority status, independents decide elections in Ohio. That means you don't win here by driving people out of your party's tent. You win by inviting them in.
That's worth remembering as some very prominent, very conservative Republicans nationally bemoan the fact that Sen. John McCain of Arizona is now the odds-on favorite to be their presidential nominee. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney recognized that fact on Thursday and suspended his campaign. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee soldiers on, but his is largely a regional candidacy based on support from a core GOP constituency: religious conserva tives. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas also remains in the race, but no amount of Internet chatter can conceal the fact that his libertar ian, isolationist bent represents a tiny sliver of the Republican Party.
The likelihood of a McCain nom ination ought to please Republi cans of every stripe. Even before the winnowing of the GOP field began, McCain stood out as the party's most impressive presidential material and its most electable candidate.
(Excerpt) Read more at cleveland.com ...
Scrappleface, right?
Calling McCain a plain-spoken pragmatist is like calling his role model, Colonel Jack Ripper, a plain-spoken pragmatist.
when 60% of republicans voted AGAINST him?
The primnaries should repeat voting until a candidate gets 50% of the vote. The lowest score drops out and you repeat as needed
And Cleveland is a socialist sh!thole on the decline, so of course their rag would endorse McRino.
Hey Plain Dealer- Blow it out of your printing press!
There. Fixed it.
P.S. — Coalition government is for the Euroweenies, not the United States of America.
"I know it's your turn. "
McCain “plain spoken”?
I don’t think so, right now he’s branding himself as a “conservative” when he is nothing of the sort.
Since it is far too late for the senator to get conservative bonafides before November, he ought to just come clean as the moderate liberal he is. He’d stand a lot better chance if he were plain spoken.
McCain “plain spoken”?
I don’t think so, right now he’s branding himself as a “conservative” when he is nothing of the sort.
Since it is far too late for the senator to get conservative bonafides before November, he ought to just come clean as the moderate liberal he is. He’d stand a lot better chance if he were plain spoken.
Words fail me.
“Maverick McCain rips GOP By Noelle Straub Friday, April 2, 2004
WASHINGTON - Sen. John McCain yesterday unleashed an attack on his own party, saying the GOP is ``astray’’ on key issues and criticizing President Bush [related, bio] on the war in Iraq.
*****``I believe my party has gone astray,’’ McCain said, criticizing GOP stands on environmental and minority issues.
*****``I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy,’’ he said. ``But I also feel the Republican Party can be brought back to the principles I articulated before.’’
*****The maverick senator made the remarks at a legislative seminar hosted by U.S. Rep. Martin T. Meehan (D-Lowell) as he again ruled out running on a ticket with Democrat John F. Kerry [related, bio].
*****The Arizona Republican took on President Bush for failing to prepare Americans for a long involvement in Iraq, saying, ``You can’t fly in on an aircraft carrier and declare victory and have the deaths continue. You can’t do that.’’
*****McCain said the U.S. should seek more U.N. involvement in Iraq. ``Many people in this room question, legitimately, whether we should have gone in or not,’’ he said, adding that that debate ``will be part of this presidential campaign.’”
I wasn't too keen on McCain but I'm warming to the idea. Mostly because of the many stalwart conservatives that have endorsed him. Rino he is not!
Before you insult the city and people of Cleveland, please let us know where you're from.
Question: Why should conservatives support McCain?
Answer: For the same reasons they should support Hillary Clinton if she were running as a Republican, facing off against Dennis Kucinich for the Dems.
- she is stronger on the WOT
- she has more experience
- she is more conservative overall
- she is the lesser evil
- her mental instability will frighten our enemies!
VOTE FOR JOHN MCCAIN! (brought to you by the same people who would call you a traitor for refusing to vote for Hillary Clinton in the above scenario)
dont you guys have anything good to say about anyone? :)
John McCain was THE main source behind feeding the anti-Bush media-beast the past eight years.
He opposed every single Republican-conservative initiative, many times providing anonymous ‘off the record’ material for liberal media publications intent on demonizing religious or Republican-conservative policies.
The reason the GOP was so badly damaged in 2006 is a direct result of John McCain’s so demoralizing the party and helping Democrats paint conservatives and GWB as insane neoCons, or whatever.
Just think how different the 2006 elections would have been had McCain had not thrown a hissy fit and instead been part of a unified, coherent Republican/conservative strategy and policy.
NOW the man expects Republicans just to forgive him because he’s ProLife, and because he was a POW.
Can’t do it.
The media and pundits love to talk about Bill Clinton being able to “triangulate” when in reality it is JOHN MCCAIN who is the smarmiest triangulator of all time.
I dont agree with you at all.all the scandals are what hurt our party
Iraq war and the way it was handled after Baghdad didnt help either.
Now that surge is working Iraq war is off the radar
Yes, I don't mean to imply it was entirely John McCain who caused the 2006 losses.
But make no mistake, McCain was THE main evidentiary source the media/Democratic/lib analysts and pundits cited over and over when they claimed that President Bush and Republicans were "wrong" on everything --
Certainly, conservatives (prior to 2006) had some disagreements with the Administration, but I recall countless conversations with my colleagues at the two mid-sized newspapers where I worked, and they constantly cited McCain rhetoric as "evidence" that Republicans were "out of touch" on everything... from the war (remember how McCain criticized Don Rumsfeld) .... to the environment ... to illegal immigration ... to low taxes ... to Gitmo ... to Monitoring foreign terror suspects via the FISA laws.... to selecting conservative Judges.
McCain was the facilitator behind the total demoralization of conservative- Republicans between 2002 and 2007.
That's when he suddenly STOPPED demonizing the religious right and conservatives because he suddenly realized he would need them to run for President.
In politics as in war, the only thing worse than your enemy is someone on YOUR side who helps the enemy. (and I don't mean to portray lib/Dems as military enemies. just making a point)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.