I dont like going after the offspring of canditates. Unless they are going to be in the goverment of the parent.
Let them be.....
If she's out there stumping for mommy dearest, she's fair game.
If they are young, e.g. college age or younger, or if they are older but NOT stumping in public for their parent, I agree. But Chelsea is 27 years old and has chosen to publicly campaign for her mother. She is fair game for everything any other person campaigning for a candidate gets.
I agree. Plus, Chelsea shouldn't be the issue.
If the offspring inject themselves into politics by running for something or by campaigning for someone else who is running for office or if they publicly support positions about which there is some controversy then they have taken the shields off and are fair to be criticized. One’s membership in a Democrat-protected group does not make one immune though the Democrats and the MSM would like us to accept that they are immune. The planted assumption here is that if you disapprove of Chelsea’s publicly urging views on public issues then you are attacking her personally in a most vile and misogynistic and child-hating manner. I.e. you disapprove of socialism therefore you hate Chelsea because she is a woman and a little girl.
To say that Hillary is "pimping out" Chelsea, is to insult HILLARY.
In any case, I would agree with you if Chelsea wanted to stay on the sidelines.
But Chelsea got into the game. She gets no quarter.
If the offspring is out there trying as hard as Chelsea is to foist her mother's governmental 'abilities' on us, then she's just as much of an enabler as anybody from the bitchocracy that Hillary is going to drag into office with her.
She's fair game.
She is actively campaigning for Hillary. To make her off-limits means she is nothing but a political human shield.