Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virtual Fence Has Flaws
KFOX Morning News ^ | February 14, 2008 | Arleene Barrios

Posted on 02/14/2008 6:39:05 PM PST by Iron Munro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Iron Munro
Found after disassembling the radar to find the problem:


21 posted on 02/14/2008 7:39:21 PM PST by chemicalman (Re-draft Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

A “virtual fence” equals a “Welcome Mat”!


22 posted on 02/14/2008 7:40:28 PM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

LOL


23 posted on 02/14/2008 8:00:45 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

There’s nothing wrong with a virtual fence.

And this beautiful virtual Brooklyn Bridge I have over here is for sale for a paltry $1,000,000.00. Just as good as that virtual fence over there. Please make your wire transfer to the following Swiss Bank:

XXXXX


24 posted on 02/14/2008 8:14:56 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (I'm a Maverick Republican: I'll oppose the Party Nominee if I want too, and you have to like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

bump


25 posted on 02/14/2008 8:28:16 PM PST by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

The secret: The vitual fence is NO FENCE AT ALL...


26 posted on 02/14/2008 8:40:34 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The virtual fence is .. well, virtual, and it will stop all of the virtual border crossers.


27 posted on 02/14/2008 8:55:01 PM PST by webboy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
A real wall made of concrete and barbed wire works well, has no moving parts, incurs minimum maintenance costs and does not require constant monitoring with around the clock operators. But it has two drawbacks as far as the federal government is concerned:

1 - A real, physical fence will actually work. It will effectively slow down and/or stop illegal crossings

2 - A real fence doesn't cost enough and doesn't require multi-million dollar contracts to purchase expensive equipment from companies run by large financial contributors to politicians. And once a real fence is built there is no need for additional contracts for expensive upgrades, maintenance and repairs.

What good is an expensive government project if politicians and bureaucrats can't channel the money to their friends and financial backers? Politicians are less concerned about the effectiveness of a project than the size of the contracts and who gets them.

Exactly right! On all counts.

I am in favor of a double-layer fence, with razor wire atop both fences, and a concrete floor reaching deeply inside the inner fence, to make tunneling difficult.

No doubt, some who are indifferent to the current invasion (or who secretly support it) would compare such a wall to the Berlin Wall of the Cold War era. But I have very little patience for anyone who cannot (or will not) differentiate between a wall designed to keep people prisoners in their own failed state, and a wall designed to preserve national sovereignty by making immigration an orderly process.

28 posted on 02/14/2008 8:55:32 PM PST by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

MUST SEE!

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=WcE3c7x0kOI


29 posted on 02/18/2008 12:48:57 PM PST by acoulterfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: acoulterfan

Thanks for the link.

What a travesty!

It looks like a drainage tunnel but that’s no reason it can’t be blocked with steel bars like is done to prevent livestock from using drainage culverts.
Of course they might have to be cleared of debris every now and then but that seems a small price to pay for keeping illegals out.

More confirmation that authorities aren’t really serious about sealing the border.


30 posted on 02/18/2008 4:43:20 PM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Virtual fences are meant to gull virtual idiots. There is not a "virtual fence" around the Whitehouse.

"Border Reality 101"

This is what most of our southern border looks like: there is no government-built fence at all. There is often just whatever is left over from some forgotten cattle fence, built privately to keep U.S. cattle from wandering freely into Mexico. For hundreds of miles there is not even a broken cattle fence, there is nothing at all.

For comparison, below the broken cattle fence photo is a sample of an inexpensive but highly effective double border fence system, with a plowed strip to reveal footprints. This type of system is very cheap and can be built with great speed.

Here is what some of San Diego County has: a wall made of rusty Viet Nam-era runway mats. The corrugations are even horizontal, (to make climbing easier?)

Here is what the border looks like where the runway mat wall exists. Mexico begins on the other side of the ineffective rusty wall, which actually helps the smugglers, by hiding their movements until the occasional USBP vehicle has driven out of sight.

This is how "the game" is played. Smugglers hide on the other side of the wall with their dope and/or their illegals, out of sight of the USBP. They wait for the highly visible white BP vehicle to drive over the distant hills. Lookouts with cell phones and walkie-talkies report on the current locations of the BP units. They know with certainty that "the coast is clear" for an hour or two, and the smugglers and illegals hop the fence and run into the scrub only 50 yards away. From there, they are out of sight, and they walk 1-2 miles to holding houses. Then they wait for nightfall, and are picked up and driven in vans to LA or San Diego.

Next, we see the Duncan Hunter 15' fence, which is already being built along a few "showplace" miles of San Diego, mainly near the ports of entry, where panderng politicians can conveniently show it off to gullible reporters. As you can see, the rusty runway wall is seen at the left side, Mexico begins on the other side. In areas with the 15 foot fence, dope smugglers and illegals will have to cross the open sand ("the government road" as it is called) before starting to try to get over the 15 foot fence.

This new fence is extremely tough, and resists cutting. Attacking the fence would have to be done right out in the open, in full view of cameras. This type of fence, on the U.S. side of the government road, will give the USBP a barrier to patrol, instead of forcing them to chase illegals around 100,000 square miles of wide-open frontier land, which is a fool's errand. Everywhere this modern multiple fence system has been built, crossings by illegals drop to almost nil.

This ain't rocket science, folks. We're not talking about something like the Hoover Dam project, (which we managed to build 70 years ago). The world's last superpower, which put a man on the moon 35 years ago, can build a couple thousand miles of simple and effective fencing.

This is how it's being built in San Diego county, along the last 14 miles out to the ocean. The total cost of the entire fence from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific would be about 5 billion dollars, or what we spend medicating, hospitalizing, educating, and incarcerating illegal aliens just about every month. In other words, the fence would pay for itself immediately.

Or, we can continue our current policy.


31 posted on 02/18/2008 4:48:32 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

32 posted on 02/28/2008 11:40:23 AM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson