[Clemenza]

These polls have been all over the place. I still think that Hillary takes Ohio (due to proletarian white folks) and Texas (thanks to Hispanics).

[Lurker]

If Hillary loses Texas things will get really ugly really fast.

L

[IMissPresidentReagan]

Hey, how come that “Someone else” guy isn’t running on the Republican side? He may do better than 3%. :D

[Sacajaweau]

Two possible nominees and they’re both socialists to the extreme.

[GOP_Party_Animal]

HIL-DA-BEAST! HIL-DA-BEAST! HIL-DA-BEAST!

[al_c]

The harder she campaigns, the more it hurts her. LOL!

[Poundstone]

Never heard of American Research Group, so I have little confidence in this poll. Even if Obama loses Texas, if he can cut Hillary’s margin of victory to, say, 3 points, he scores a psychological victory, gets almost as many delegates, doesn’t slow down his own momentum much — and strengthens his appeal to the uncommitted superdelegates. Not to mention causing more panic within the Clinton campaign.

Got popcorn?

[HD1200]

Not that I care, but American Research Group is a nut case polling company run by a questionable character.

http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2007/12/problem-with-american-research-group.html

A problem with American Research Group polling organization

With some interest in how the polls work, and some of the oddities thereof, I decided to take a look at a small group that sees some oddities in their polling: American Research Group. Not to be confused with America’s Research Group, a whole different organization.

One of my first conclusions is that ARG is looking to be the true anonymous polling group! Really, they have very little in the way of public profile, and yet get their polls to be highly visible. So, when seeing things like that I do a bit of searching, and with names not coming up at their web site or any ‘About Us’ sort of deal, that means really searching. So the best place to start is: WHOIS domain name lookup.

[Jedidah]

College kids, in their naivete, are voting for Obama in droves.

Not yet wizened by the world, they aren’t examining the substance of his message, which is thin and socialist.

That’s what Obama’s opponents are going to have to do, expose him.

[diamond6]

I’d like to take a poll. Of the two, who do you think is more dangerous?

[OPS4]

Bye Bye Hillary Marxist Clinton, Hello John McCain!
McCain 2008

[Miss Didi]

Another chapter in the Democrat Uncivil War unfolds.

RUSH: Nomination Comes Down to Which Democrats are the Bigger Racists



Mrs. Clinton: Classic Manipulator

[epluribus_2]

fat lady warming up in wings...

[Non-Sequitur]

It takes more than one poll to write her off. But all polls I’ve seen do have her lead diminishing. This could well be true come March.

[Brad from Tennessee]

Rasmussen Feb. 15

Texas Democratic Presidential Primary
Texas: Clinton 54% Obama 38%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/texas/texas_democratic_presidential_primary

[AbeKrieger]

[HenpeckedCon]

If the disaster I foresee coming in November happens, I think we all be longing for the good old days of the Carter Administration.

[ChocChipCookie]

Aren’t the Texas and Ohio primaries on March 4? A lot can happen between now and then.

[Hacklehead]

Those numbers don’t add up. For Obama to have gained 20 points in the last month means he had to get all of the Edwards and Kucinich votes, and almost all of the newly decided. Hellary’s numbers are essentially flat.
The latest RCP polls taken in the last few days show Hellary up by double digits in TX, PA and OH.

[Blagden Alley]

That headline is ambigous.