Posted on 02/18/2008 9:57:49 AM PST by 50mm
Or they have discovered that it’s just easier to latch onto an evil, facile, brainless cliché and go with the flow.
Can’t argue with you on that. Their defensive reaction to my question was quite a surprise to me.
You are right, I read your post quickly and added “moment” to what I read. But the reduction of conception to a singularity of some sort is a religious belief. Nothing wrong with that, but it should be recognized as such.
When, in your obviously brilliant and oh-so enlightened head, does a person become a person, then?
I never said anything remotely religious. I described a physical event. It can be seen happening through a simple microscope. I have seen it happen in countless educational films.
There is a time when it has not yet happened. There is a time--NOT LONG AFTER--when it HAS happened.
I never said anything about a "moment" or a "singularity." One thing is certain: The time it DOES take, and the actual, physical events that occur, provide proof positive that every act of procured abortion is a homicide. In simpler words: If you LOOK, you can SEE that, by the time of EVERY procured abortion, a living human body exists, and is deliberately destroyed. That's called a murder.
The assertion that anything I wrote is "religious" is preposterous. I haven't discussed anything that can't be seen through a microscope and photographed with a camera. Let me say it again: The assertion that anything I've written is "religious" is preposterous.
The real issue is: What motivates people to make preposterous assertions? I suggest that by far the most common motives are base ones, such as the desire to enjoy the liberty to kill people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.