Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Underground City Planned for Amsterdam
Weekly Telegraph ^ | Tuesday, February 19, 2008 | Bruno Waterfield

Posted on 02/19/2008 4:30:09 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

AMSTERDAM is to go underground as overcrowding and soaring land prices force planners to look beneath the city's famous canals for future urban development.

The canals will be drained to allow architects to build the underground city, which will reduce the pressures of overcrowding and slash the cost of a parking space

Dutch engineers have unveiled plans for a £7.4 billion underground city providing one million square feet of underground retail, leisure and parking facilities.

"There has always been a lack of space in the city, so what we are doing is building a city under the city by using a new construction technique, which will not interfere with street traffic," said Moshe Zwarts, a partner at the architects Zwarts & Jansma.

Residents of the historic houses that line Amsterdam's central canals have to wait up to seven years for parking permits and a garage space can cost as much as £74,000.

Property prices, once a bargain in the Dutch city that is the cultural and commercial capital of the Netherlands, are also soaring. The price of an apartment in the De Pijp district which cost £90,000 in 1999, has risen nine years later to £223,000 or more.

advertisement

The one-way streets, on either side of Amsterdam's waterways, are also feeling the strain of overcrowding, and traffic is frequently thrown into chaos for hours by delivery vans and rubbish collectors.

Amsterdam was originally built on drained, swampy marshland and many of the classic Dutch gabled houses along its canals are still precariously supported by underground wooden beams.

To find space for new developments, the Dutch engineers have decided it is easier to build in the clay under the canals.

Under the plans, canal water will be temporarily pumped out in order to start construction beneath.

"Amsterdam sits on a 30-metre layer of waterproof clay which will be used together with concrete and sand to make new walls," said

Mr Zwarts.

"Once we have resealed the canal floor, we will be able to carry on working underneath while pouring water back into the canals. It's an easy technique and it doesn't create issues with drilling noises on the streets."

Youssef Eddini, a spokesman for the Strukton engineering group that will build the underground city, has stressed that the new plan will not cause as much disruption as other projects.

"All materials could be brought to the site by water. We can use the canals as a road," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: netherlands; urban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2008 4:30:10 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
something poetically just about a filthy metropolis going underground.

Yeah, I like it.

2 posted on 02/19/2008 4:34:05 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (unavailable for comment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Great.

An underground city full of junkies and whores. Soon to be choked with the suicidal sons of the desert.

Can’t wait.


3 posted on 02/19/2008 4:36:35 PM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I don’t think I would want to be underground in a country that is below sea level.


4 posted on 02/19/2008 4:37:16 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

God built the world, but the Dutch built Holland.


5 posted on 02/19/2008 4:38:04 PM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

The Muslims will live on surface while the native-born Dutch will live underground.


6 posted on 02/19/2008 4:38:50 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Brilliant!! Can someone say New Orleans.


7 posted on 02/19/2008 4:40:10 PM PST by jacob allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I can’t, for the life of me, understand why New Orleans didn’t consult with the engineers in the Netherlands that seem to handle being below sea-level quite capably.


8 posted on 02/19/2008 4:45:02 PM PST by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

or the dikes.


9 posted on 02/19/2008 4:55:17 PM PST by wildwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

“AMSTERDAM is to go underground as overcrowding”

“which will reduce the pressures of overcrowding”

“There has always been a lack of space in the city”

“are also feeling the strain of overcrowding”

Solution: Deport your large Muslem population. This will solve the overcrowding, decrease strains on your social services, decrease crime, and improve social cohesion and national unity.


10 posted on 02/19/2008 5:04:54 PM PST by Walvoord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Exactly. It’s a canal city. What a stupid idea.


11 posted on 02/19/2008 5:07:06 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Does this mean that if the underground city begins to flood Hans Brinker will have to stick his finger in a sewer manhole?

Leni

12 posted on 02/19/2008 5:08:48 PM PST by MinuteGal (Mitt and Fred are Still My Guys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The canals aren’t very wide, and in some locations there are already underground structures alongside the canal (which are, as I recall, pretty damp inside). So to construct any significant structures, they are probably going to have to undermine adjacent buildings.


13 posted on 02/19/2008 5:13:13 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
amsterdam
14 posted on 02/19/2008 5:16:07 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

15 posted on 02/19/2008 5:19:33 PM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
I can’t, for the life of me, understand why New Orleans didn’t consult with the engineers in the Netherlands that seem to handle being below sea-level quite capably.

Actually, the Dutch have used pump designs which originated in New Orleans. The Netherlands' superiority is in building flood control gates to tame the sea, roughly the same task as stopping hurricane storm surges. One such project was planned in the New Orleans area on the 1970s... but some environmentalist wackos sued in federal court and succeeded in halting the project.

Even though the Dutch aren't hobbled by the enviro-idiots, I still wouldn't want to live under a canal.

16 posted on 02/19/2008 5:30:34 PM PST by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: americanophile; Brilliant
Exactly. It’s a canal city. What a stupid idea.

Makes about as much sense as a subway in New Orleans.

17 posted on 02/19/2008 5:31:29 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Muzz are thinking -—Wow more stuff for us when we take over


18 posted on 02/19/2008 5:32:23 PM PST by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<<<||||>>>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Interestingly, at a million square feet that ‘city’ is a little less than one-quarter the size of the Mall of America.


19 posted on 02/19/2008 5:41:35 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

$7,400 per square foot. Somebody with more knowledge can tell me how outrageous that is or isn’t. And needless to say that price will go higher.


20 posted on 02/19/2008 5:50:23 PM PST by torchthemummy ("The law of unintended consequences has not been repealed." - Fransam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson