Skip to comments.
Larry Sinclair: Obama Accuser Fails Polygraphs
bloggernews ^
Posted on 02/24/2008 3:56:19 PM PST by hotdog777
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: hotdog777
So Sinclair blew the polygraph?
41
posted on
02/24/2008 4:40:42 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Fishtalk
They are a stable of investigations and are considered by those who do this for a living as very reliable. Psychics also consider what they purport to do as "very reliable".
I base my assertion on the fact that the way vast majority of law enforcement organizations in this country use polygraphs as does the FBI.
LE and FBI also use crackhead lowlife as "reliable informants"
42
posted on
02/24/2008 4:45:22 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Never say yer sorry, mister. It's a sign of weakness)
To: Fishtalk
To: pnh102
This is the type of scum that attack Obama with crap about his being a muslim or took the oath of office on a koran or won.t pledge to the flag we all love. Lets argue issues like NAFTA and the loss of AMERICA to CHINA and Mexico but lets get off this crap that Sinclair was vomiting.
44
posted on
02/24/2008 4:48:43 PM PST
by
joebeth
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Yeah, it is weird. Because when he started this in September, Obama wasn’t a phenomenon. It is strange. I am interested in seeing what the points of deception were on the two exams.
45
posted on
02/24/2008 4:53:55 PM PST
by
Pinetop
To: joebeth
I agree, its time to end the tabloid crap and talk about issues.
46
posted on
02/24/2008 4:56:36 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Voting CONSERVATIVE in memory of 5 children killed by illegals 2/17/08 and 2/19/ 08)
To: pnh102
“We’d be best to steer away from this creep. Aside from the fact that his story is failing to pan out, this kind of “bad news” wouldn’t sink Obama at all. As I’ve said before, the Democrats did not care in 1992 that Bill Clinton was fooling around. They won’t care if Obama had done it either.”
True that...and if it was true that it was with a man it would be glorified into he’s open to all the contingents of the party...
47
posted on
02/24/2008 4:57:41 PM PST
by
phatus maximus
(John 6:29...Learn it, love it, live it...)
To: HD1200
A polygraph is totally inaccurate. Larry could be telling a lie and the polygraph says he is telling the truth, or Larry could be telling the truth and and the polygraph says he is telling a lie
I agree 100%, how do I know? I failed one, and I was telling the absolute truth. They are worthless.
48
posted on
02/24/2008 4:59:59 PM PST
by
VastRWCon
(Fred/Hunter 2008)
To: Fishtalk
They are a stable of investigations and are considered by those who do this for a living as very reliable.
what you just said, please read between the lines, looks more like JOB SECURITY to me.
My opion they dont work and are not reliable, how do I know? It didn't work on me. I told the truth and failed.
49
posted on
02/24/2008 5:02:29 PM PST
by
VastRWCon
(Fred/Hunter 2008)
To: hotdog777
Whitehouse.com, had offered Sinclair the sum of $10,000 to take a polygraph
OK, my turn!
50
posted on
02/24/2008 5:03:14 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
( Don’t go messing with Smokey Taylor. He just bought a whole bunch of fresh ammo.)
To: hotdog777
This story was bogus from the beginning and all the FReepers who bought into it should be spanked..........
51
posted on
02/24/2008 5:04:21 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
( Don’t go messing with Smokey Taylor. He just bought a whole bunch of fresh ammo.)
To: hotdog777
Hildabeast must be quite disappointed. This was about her last chance at getting the nomination.
To: ex-snook
"Some Freeper posers are disappointed."Yep, and a certain freeper who kept promoting this story (even implying he didn't care if it was true or not) attacked those of us who said it smelled like crap.
As others have said, there are tons of legitimate things to fight Obama on, we should focus on those things and not fall for the dirty tricks stuff.
53
posted on
02/24/2008 5:05:38 PM PST
by
incindiary
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVodI85NLMQ)
To: Fishtalk
"I base my assertion on the fact that the way vast majority of law enforcement organizations in this country use polygraphs as does the FBI."I worked for a big retail chain. Everyone who was hired to handle money was polygraphed. 1/3 were rejected for "proclivity to deceive". All department heads and above agreed before hire to be polygraphed at any time.
yitbos
54
posted on
02/24/2008 5:06:40 PM PST
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds. - Ayn Rand")
To: HD1200
The seriousness of the allegations trumps the questionability of Mr. Sinclair.
You'v got to be kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wait a minute, are you Dannie Rather?
You'd better put your flameproof underwear on newbie after a remark like that..........
55
posted on
02/24/2008 5:09:18 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
( Don’t go messing with Smokey Taylor. He just bought a whole bunch of fresh ammo.)
To: Sonny M
"If he had been paid by the Obama campaign, they would have acknowledged him by both claiming he is lying and working for a rival campaign, and then they would have been trumping this lie detector as de facto evidence that the guy is a liar."They will do exactly that in the future. It will also dissuade any opposition from any derrogatory statements, even if true. It is a preemptive strike.
The fact remains Osama is a doper.
yitbos
56
posted on
02/24/2008 5:10:26 PM PST
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds. - Ayn Rand")
To: billhilly
More wasted Clinton campaign cash.If it was a Clinton operation it isn't really that much of a waste. Just think about it, in supermarkets across America you have this near the checkout.........
If the Obama team had it's way, do you think they would rather have that paper on or off the stands?
57
posted on
02/24/2008 5:14:53 PM PST
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: hotdog777
So Larry Gail Magnum, I mean, Larry Sinclair, didn’t succeed in his Nifong attempt. But I’m sure a gang of at least 88 Freepers have asked themselves what a social disaster might sound like.
To: incindiary; ex-snook
Let’s see if anyone apologizes.
< crickets >
Guess not.
To: pnh102
in 1998, 2000, and 2008 they didn’t even care that Bill Clinont committed several acts of rape and that his wife who’s now running for co-president again attacked his victims in the press.
60
posted on
02/24/2008 5:21:05 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson