Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's grain stocks running short (food security and export control?)
The Grand Island Independent ^ | 02/24/08 | By Robert Pore

Posted on 02/25/2008 5:08:27 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

America's grain stocks running short

By Robert Pore robert.pore@theindependent.com

Print Story | e-mail Story | Visit Forums

Global demand for grain and oilseeds is at record levels, causing the nation's grain stocks to reach critically low levels, according to Purdue University agricultural economist Chris Hurt.

With a weak U.S. dollar and global demand so high, foreign buyers are outbidding domestic buyers for American grain, Hurt said.

"Food consumers worldwide are going to have to pay more," Hurt said. "We ended 2007 with our monthly inflation rate on food nearly 5 percent higher. I think we'll see times in 2008 where the food inflation rate might be as much as 6 percent."

Increasing food costs will ignite the debate on food security this year, Hurt said.

"We'll have discussions about whether we should allow the foreign sector to buy our food," he said. "Is food a strategic item that we need to keep in our country?"

The USDA recently released a revised forecast for agricultural exports, predicting a record of $101 billion for fiscal year 2008.

According to the U.S. Grains Council, a significant increase in feed grain exports buoyed the forecasts. Specifically, the forecast for coarse grain exports is raised to 70 million tons, up 2 million tons since November. Corn and sorghum exports are up $2.4 billion from November. Coarse grain exports are forecast at $14.1 billion, $4.3 billion above last year's level.

Hurt said the 2007 U.S. wheat crop is virtually sold out, while domestic soybean stocks soon will fall below a 20-day supply. Corn inventories are stronger, but with demand from export markets, the livestock industry and ethanol plants, supplies also could be just as scarce for the 2008 crop.

More than 70 percent of Nebraska corn crop this year could go to ethanol production.

But what concerns Hurt the most is weather. Adverse weather could trim crop yields this year and cause crop prices to skyrocket even further.

Last year, Nebraska had a record corn crop of nearly 1.5 billion bushels. But rainfall was exceptional last year, especially during the growing season, which helped increase crop yields.

He said recent cash prices for wheat, soybeans and corn are up dramatically from two years ago. Wheat prices have been near $10 a bushel, more than $6 a bushel higher. Cash prices for soybeans are about $13 a bushel, up more than $7 a bushel. Corn is pricing at almost $5 a bushel, an increase of greater than $3 a bushel.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: agw; california; corn; drought; ethanol; foodsecurity; grain; grainshortage; hydrocarbons; lowstock; maize; methane; oilseeds; opec; petroleum; pricehike; soybeans; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-274 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot

Because the farmers are voluntarily staying out.


241 posted on 02/27/2008 6:02:05 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
??? I'm confused. This sounds like great news for our economy as a whole since we make tons of bucks exporting food overseas. Keep prices high, encourage more production and ship even more grain.

Maybe we can start lowering the trade deficit.
242 posted on 02/27/2008 6:05:44 PM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Why would they stay out? I thought it was free money.


243 posted on 02/27/2008 6:07:58 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I know you think that, it has blinded you to the reality of the situation. Like all government programs, nothing is free, the money comes with an enormous chain.

Briefly, in order to qualify for the money you must agree to stay poor.


244 posted on 02/27/2008 6:19:52 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
The point is that foreigners are willing to pay a lot more than Americans want to. As a result, Americans have to pay more. Food gets really expensive. If it is not day-to-day necessity, it won’t be much of a problem.
245 posted on 02/27/2008 6:24:43 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Briefly, in order to qualify for the money you must agree to stay poor.

Like the guys who live off Central Park? Those millionaires who get payments?

246 posted on 02/27/2008 6:25:18 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

There are always exceptions to the rule, but those guys are also critical to the success of the programs.

To see who is producing our food, drive through farm country, the midwest, the south.

You will see real farmers, and you will see real farming towns. There is a reason those town are small, people live there for the simple lifestyle, not the money. There is no money. Just old buildings.

All of those towns are poor, just like the farmers.


247 posted on 02/27/2008 6:40:35 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Yeah, farmers are great people. I just don’t want to give them my tax dollars for programs that don’t work.


248 posted on 02/27/2008 6:47:25 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Well, you can take satisfaction in that they have to greatly humiliate themselves to qualify.

THAT’s why they are avoiding it this year.


249 posted on 02/27/2008 6:49:26 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

This may help.

You are so focused only on the ethanol subsidies tree that you are unable to see the forest of supply and demand.

Forget the damn ethanol subsidies. I know, I know, but try. Those subsidies just happen to be the trigger.

That price increase trigger could have been any one of dozens of things.

Just imagine something; instead of ethanol lets use a trigger that farmers have been denied for decades. Lets just use world demand for our farm products as the triggering factor. That’s one that the American farmers have struggled for years to develop, only to be cut off at the knees time and again.

I myself, along with most farmers, lost thousands and thousands back in the 70’s when US crop exports to Russia where suddenly cut off . Existing delivery contracts were canceled by our government, and crop prices plummeted overnight, leaving us with crops that were worth 25 to 75 cent a bushel LESS than they were at 3 pm the day before. When there are several 30,000 bushel bins full at stake it hurts. This was done in response to a short US crop.

So, if the world demand allows farmers to export as much of their crops as they can grow, domestic food is going to have to compete directly with China etc.

As a result of that increased demand, the resulting com petition will drive prices up. In this example, prices will rise to the point that farmers will voluntarily leave the government programs. In other words, they will rise to where they are today.

Production levels will be where they are today.

Food prices will also be where they are today.

There would be no government programs.


250 posted on 02/27/2008 6:53:57 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
THAT’s why they are avoiding it this year.

Yeah, right. LOL!

So now you're against them, because they're humiliating?

251 posted on 02/27/2008 6:53:57 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Yeah, you’re right to laugh.I should have said that it’s the source of that humiliation that is the reason.

By signing up, they have to agree that they won’t make too much money. They have to condem themselves and their families to poverty for another year.


252 posted on 02/27/2008 7:02:42 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
You are so focused only on the ethanol subsidies tree

And the milk compacts. And the sugar quotas and price supports. And all the other price supports. And payments to not grow. And payments to grow. And the wasteful bureaucracy that grew to send the checks and file the paperwork.

that you are unable to see the forest of supply and demand.

I love supply and demand. We should try it for agricultural products.

I myself, along with most farmers, lost thousands and thousands back in the 70’s when US crop exports to Russia where suddenly cut off . Existing delivery contracts were canceled by our government,

That's terrible. Like I said before, I'm against government interference in markets.

So, if the world demand allows farmers to export as much of their crops as they can grow, domestic food is going to have to compete directly with China etc.

If all the government programs were ended, I'd be happy to allow world supply and demand determine food prices.

As a result of that increased demand, the resulting competition will drive prices up.

Or drive prices down.

In this example, prices will rise to the point that farmers will voluntarily leave the government programs.

So, the cheap food programs only keep food cheap when it's already cheap? At the cost of billions in tax dollars. When food is expensive, the programs don't keep food cheap? So much for your claim that they lower prices. LOL!

There would be no government programs.

I wish.

253 posted on 02/27/2008 7:04:16 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
By signing up, they have to agree that they won’t make too much money. They have to condem themselves and their families to poverty for another year.

Right. Like the farmers in Manhattan who have to agree not to make too much.

If they make too much, they can give the money back.

254 posted on 02/27/2008 7:07:26 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

OK, now that I’ve outlined a path to plentiful food without the governement, it’s your turn.

Make a path.


255 posted on 02/27/2008 7:39:54 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
OK, now that I’ve outlined a path to plentiful food without the governement, it’s your turn.

Your path is higher prices so farmers don't need to take humiliating government handouts?

Make a path.

My path is farmers grow what they want. Or don't grow what they don't want. If they can make money at it, great. If they can't, great.

If they make money, they should expand production. If they can't make money, they should reduce their production or go out of business.

If ethanol makes economic sense, corn farmers (or whatever crop)should grow crops to produce it. Without government mandates, without government handouts, without blending credits.

256 posted on 02/27/2008 7:54:07 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I asked for a path, not just a beginning and end.


257 posted on 02/27/2008 8:02:27 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Was my path too complicated for you?

Get the government out of it. Prices will rise and fall according to supply and demand. Sound good to you?

258 posted on 02/27/2008 8:11:42 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

We can’t even farm right any more.

what is this country coming to.

we are going to be right there with zimbabwe?


259 posted on 02/27/2008 8:13:26 PM PST by television is just wrong (Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

The government out, yes. I’ve illustrated how much the government cost me in just one 24 hour period. I have no love for those pencil pushers who regularly issue
price depressing crop reports and kill otherwise legit deals with behind the scenes regulations.

Now flesh it our a bit.


260 posted on 02/27/2008 8:36:02 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-274 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson