It’s scary how incompetent people become when their intrigues are revealed. Not one, but two governments can’t doctor up a convincing confession? So much for al Qaeda as suspects. And if J. Aguilar is right, the case for ETA is a smokescreen as well. As a Russian friend of mine once told me, there is the given truth, then there’s a concealed truth, then there’s the truth beyond that and a truth beyond that...
Secondly, when something is known, it is usually indirectly, by people with their own agenda, who usually focus in some aspects, leaving others.
In the case of Italy, Claudio Celani praises the Pellegrino Parliamentary commission for its investigations, however, the association of victims of the Bologna massacre criticizes it: probably the parliamentary commission made some advances in the investigation, but not enough.
However, IMHO, this article follows a different goal. It is not about assigning individual responsibilities or fitting details, but to show the general philosophy, the probable way of thinking the conspirers had and have.
I mean, in everyday's world you need to prove things in order to get Justice; however, in the world of intelligence, deception and disinformation, it is enough for you to know and maybe even just to suspect what is going on, in order to counteract the enemy's movements.