Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems' "Energy" Bill Benefits Hugo Chavez, Does Nothing to Lower Gasoline Prices.......
republicanleader.house.gov ^ | John Boehner

Posted on 02/27/2008 12:51:40 PM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2008 12:51:41 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I am really regretting putting these “blame America” clowns in office.


2 posted on 02/27/2008 12:54:19 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’m not sure I’m buying this. Even Democrats are not that stupid.


3 posted on 02/27/2008 12:56:19 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Oh, they sure are.


4 posted on 02/27/2008 12:59:25 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Goverment shouldn’t be “lowering prices”: supply and demand will take care of that. Government should ensure fair competition and the rule of law.Period.


5 posted on 02/27/2008 12:59:28 PM PST by MoreGovLess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This should be used in Congressional Campaign Ads this fall. We need to replace all the rats and take back the house and senate.


6 posted on 02/27/2008 1:02:21 PM PST by Mogollon (Vote straight GOP for congress....our only protection against Obama-Clinton, or McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

our gov’t (both state and fed) should lower tax on gasoline and kerosene


7 posted on 02/27/2008 1:05:47 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Sure is hard to make sense of today’s threads, except for those that involve smashing the moon or smashing enemy fortifications or smashing other things.


8 posted on 02/27/2008 1:07:31 PM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Related
9 posted on 02/27/2008 1:07:53 PM PST by Kaslin (Peace is the aftermath of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
To make matters even worse, the bill does a favor for Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez by exempting his state-owned oil giant CITGO from the impact of the measure.

Apparently John Boehner has not heard of hte Kennedy crime family.

Oilman Joe Kennedy

10 posted on 02/27/2008 1:08:34 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (<I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Once again, another liberal entitlement program......


11 posted on 02/27/2008 1:20:03 PM PST by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

“Goverment shouldn’t be lowering prices”

Sure they should...if it comes from reduced taxes.

Why should the government make a greater profit on the sale of a gallon of gas than the private enterprise?


12 posted on 02/27/2008 1:32:06 PM PST by Deut28 (Cursed be he who perverts the justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Am I missing something?

Democrats do not want to lower gasoline prices. Many of them have openly advocated much higher prices in past, more in line with the extremely high prices paid in Europe.

They are on record as having said this. Didn’t anyone believe them?

Far more commonly, they say they want to lower gas prices by doing things that will inherently *raise* gas prices.


13 posted on 02/27/2008 1:36:58 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess
Goverment shouldn’t be “lowering prices”: supply and demand will take care of that. Government should ensure fair competition and the rule of law.Period.

The government raises or lowers price when they take actions that affect supply. The US Government has taken overt intentional action to restrict supply. The Democrats, with the help of Senator McCain are directly responsible for the restrictions.

The energy situation should be coequal to the war on terror as a campaign issue because the economic health of the US is vital to our defense. However, since Rino McCain is the defacto campaign leader and he has already gone to the other side on this issue, we are voiceless.

This issue alone highlights the danger of believing McCain would be the stronger defense candidate. We've lost this battle since he went over to the other side a long time ago.

14 posted on 02/27/2008 1:51:59 PM PST by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon
This should be used in Congressional Campaign Ads this fall. We need to replace all the rats and take back the house and senate.
15 posted on 02/27/2008 1:53:48 PM PST by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yoy haven’t seen anything yet. Wait unti Barry Hussein Obama lands in Washington!


16 posted on 02/27/2008 1:57:18 PM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Not stupid. Greedy and hateful.


17 posted on 02/27/2008 2:35:52 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I’d like to know how the bill exempted CITGO.


18 posted on 02/27/2008 2:37:15 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I would like to see the bill, but there is nothing on the Thomas site that mentions Citgo.


19 posted on 02/27/2008 2:48:11 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I dunno. This all sounds like propaganda.

Yes, the House bill is stupid since it’s nothing but a tax increase on the most heavily taxed industry in the country.

It certainly won’t create more energy or lower the price of gasoline. Probably the opposite.

But when you’re going to attack it as a handout to Hugo Chavez, I think you’re obligated to actually back that up. And I’ve looked at all the news articles I could find on this, and I’m not seeing it.


20 posted on 02/27/2008 2:53:23 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson