Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Semites for Obama
Tennesee Republican Party ^ | Tennesee Republican Party

Posted on 02/28/2008 12:58:34 PM PST by Winged Hussar

NASHVILLE, TN - The Tennessee Republican Party today joins a growing chorus of Americans concerned about the future of the nation of Israel, the only stable democracy in the Middle East, if Sen. Barack Obama is elected president of the United States.

“It’s time to set the record straight about Barack Obama and where he really stands on vital issues such as national security and the security of Israel,” said Robin Smith, chairman of the Tennessee Republican Party. “Voters need to know about two items that surfaced today which strongly suggest that an Obama presidency will view Israel as a problem rather than a partner for peace in the Middle East.

On Sunday, Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan on Sunday likened Obama to a new messiah, calling him “the hope of the entire world.” That’s the same Louis Farrakhan who has a history of making openly anti-Semitic statements, calling Judaism a “gutter religion,” and suggesting that crack cocaine might have been a CIA plot to enslave blacks.

Farrakhan, addressing 20,000 people at the annual Savior’s Day celebration in Chicago, praised the Democrat presidential candidate, calling Obama “The hope of the entire world that America will change and be made better.”

...“Nothing in Barack Obama’s history or his choice of advisers suggests he will be a friend to Israel,” said Hobbs. “On the contrary, supporters of Israel should view a possible Obama administration with extreme caution, as America’s ally is being put in the cross-hairs by the anti-Jewish left.”

(Excerpt) Read more at tngop.org ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anticatholic; antisemitic; antisemitism; farrakhan; moveonorg; noi; obama; obamamessiah; racism; racist; sharpton; tn2008
The National "Jewish" Democratic Council, an association of shills whose function is to persuade Jewish voters that the anti-Semitic "material" from Obama's friends Al Sharpton and MoveOn.org doesn't stink, condemned the Tennessee Republican Party for making these statements. The truth is that the TRP's statement is barely the tip of the iceberg. Here is the response we sent to the TRP, cc: NJDC and Republican Jewish Committee.

"NJDC Issues Release Demanding McCain Denounce Tennessee GOP for Smear Attempt" from the National Jewish Democratic Council accuses you of "smearing" Barack Obama by associating him with anti-Semitism at http://njdc.typepad.com/njdcs_blog/2008/02/njdc-issues-rel.html. I encourage the Tennessee GOP to not only refuse to apologize, but to expose Obama's enablement of racism and anti-Catholicism as well. I will be posting a more extensive piece to IsraPundit and other blogs shortly, as well as assembling some "viral E-mails" for people to circulate to their friends.

I have also copied NJDC on this E-mail because I don't see a need to say behind someone's back what I won't say to his face, and I have also copied the Republican Jewish Committe.

I will say up front that Obama has never, to the best of my knowledge, said anything personally against Jews, white people, or Catholics. It is his failure to understand (or care) that his promotion and endorsement of those who do enables anti-Semitism, hatred of Catholics, and racism that makes him unfit for office, and this is also under standards set by the NJDC itself.

(1) Hillary Clinton, Ronald Reagan, and now Mayor Lou Barletta of Hazleton PA all rejected without hesitation, equivocation, or qualification, the endorsement of hate organizations or hate mongers like the Klan's David Duke. Tuesday night, Tim Russert and Hillary Clinton had to corner Barack Hussein Obama like a rat before he would use the word "reject" in connection with the endorsement of the prominent racist, anti-Semite, and Catholic-hater Louis Farrakhan. They had to ask him three times, in fact. Clinton, Reagan, and Barletta did not need to be asked even once. As soon as they learned that a hate group or bigot had endorsed them, they stepped up and rejected that support.

NJDC condemned Ron Paul for failing to reject the Stormfront White Nationalist Community's support in this manner, and I agree 100 percent. Obama is disqualified from office under exactly the same standard, and I am citing NJDC's own standards in letters to the editor and blog entries to demonstrate this.

(2) Obama endorsed Al Sharpton and his National Action Network, both of which have a well-known record of inciting hatred of white people and especially Jews.

(3) Obama solicited and obtained the endorsement of MoveOn.org whose online Action Forum, while under the full editorial control of MoveOn's moderators, welcomed the most vicious imaginable hate speech against Jews, Catholics, and Evangelical Christians, along with 9/11 conspiracy theories. MoveOn itself published a vicious anti-Catholic hate cartoon that could have come straight from the infamous 19th century cartoonist Thomas Nast.

(4) Obama belongs to a church with a racist pastor. (I have admittedly never read of Jeremiah Wright making anti-Semitic remarks, though.)

The bottom line is that the Tennesee GOP is 100 percent correct that Obama not only has anti-Semitic (and racist, and anti-Catholic) contacts, but he even promotes, endorses, and praises most of them, Farrakhan being an exception. I encourage NJDC to research the facts more carefully and reconsider "NJDC Issues Release Demanding McCain Denounce Tennessee GOP for Smear Attempt."

I will also send the Tennessee GOP my IsraPundit posting that cites eight or nine other bloggers, many of whom are Jewish, on Obama's willful connections to hate mongers, hate groups, Israel-haters, and America-haters. This is a point that should be pressed to the utmost because neither Obama nor his supporters have any conceivable defense against it.

You might also want to know that Obama allegedly misused tax-exempt church resources to suppport his campaign, noting that a speech with campaign-related content was given at the United Church of Christ meeting last June.

Regards, [name and phone number given]

1 posted on 02/28/2008 12:58:37 PM PST by Winged Hussar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Winged Hussar

If Obama’s not an islamist, he frequently acts like one.


2 posted on 02/28/2008 1:06:02 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winged Hussar

Most American people are in favor of protecting Israel.

But our leadership has been pushing for “land for peace” and handing Israeli security to Israel’s enemies for a long time. Our own national security—defense and economic—has been handed to communist/fascist nations.

Pentagon scientists seek trusted microchip
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1977750/posts

A Hillary presidency would finish us off. Another Republican president pandering to Hillary’s constituency would finish us off. Our situation looks relatively rosy to some but really nasty to most. Consent of the most is being scoffed at.


3 posted on 02/28/2008 1:16:50 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winged Hussar

To paraphrase:
You know that little white spot on top of chicken crap? Well that spot is chicken crap too.


4 posted on 02/28/2008 1:21:34 PM PST by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

anti-semites for Obama
philo-semites for McCain

Arabs are semites, Israelis are semites....

How about a semite-neutral presiden that finally focuses on America and US citizens?


5 posted on 02/28/2008 2:22:25 PM PST by antiNeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antiNeo

Because America was founded within the Judeo-Christian heritage, the routes of which lie in the Holy Land which is governed by Jews that give freedom of religion to all its citizens and inhabitants, including islamist savages that would destroy Israel and America given the chance.


6 posted on 02/28/2008 3:41:37 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
"Because America was founded within the Judeo-Christian heritage, the routes of which lie in the Holy Land which is governed by Jews that give freedom of religion to all its citizens and inhabitants, including islamist savages that would destroy Israel and America given the chance."

The Judeo-Christian heritage that we were born from came out of Western Europe which supported centuries of anti-semitism.

Somehow tying our Judeo-Christian heritage to the relatively recent creation of the state of Israel is totally non-sensical.

Just like it took us over a hundred years (and probably more years into the future) to come to grips with our former support of racism and slavery, likewise will it take more time to come to grips with our former support of anti-semitism.

Supporting or not supporting particular policies of the Israeli government is not a sign of anti-semitism except to those race-baiters who profit from focusing more heat than light on these issues.

7 posted on 02/28/2008 3:53:41 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

A waste of time. Most liberal Jews hate America more than they love Israel. They’ll be “down” with Hussein Obama. They’ll give him money and vote for him.
8 posted on 02/28/2008 4:00:36 PM PST by Godwin1 (merican restaurant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: antiNeo
Arabs are semites, Israelis are semites....

And you are either being ignorant or are taking a smug line to protect your true position.
Jews and Arabs are Semites. However the term antisemite only refers to hatred of Jews.
9 posted on 02/28/2008 6:04:12 PM PST by rmlew (Grievance politics is a mental illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
The Judeo-Christian heritage that we were born from came out of Western Europe which supported centuries of anti-semitism.

It wasn't invented there. It originated in the Holy Land.

Somehow tying our Judeo-Christian heritage to the relatively recent creation of the state of Israel is totally non-sensical.

The only people to ever have a state there were, and are The Jews.

Just like it took us over a hundred years (and probably more years into the future) to come to grips with our former support of racism and slavery, likewise will it take more time to come to grips with our former support of anti-semitism.

You can speak for yourself, one guesses.

Supporting or not supporting particular policies of the Israeli government is not a sign of anti-semitism except to those race-baiters who profit from focusing more heat than light on these issues.

"Support" for Torah, and a people who even marginally know it, is far superior to their society's destruction by another moon god islamist state which would be erected in it's wake.

Tough it seems that's what you support. Just tattoo your's and your family's, and your children's throats where you'd prefer the islamists cut them - or you may prefer dhimmitude - if you get your eventually get your wish.

10 posted on 02/28/2008 7:57:30 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
I personally believe that the state of Israel should first declare that there is not and never was a distinct group of people called Palestinians. That Palestinians are really just Western Jordanians.

They then should declare war on Jordan, and fight until they win and declare an official border between themselves and Jordan.

At that point, if Jordan wishes, they can allow the people who call themselves Palestinains to secede and form a separate state out of Jordanian territory.

The half measures that Israel is currently engaging in with support and pressure from the rest of the world are doomed to result in an endless low level war with no end in sight.

It also encourages the Israelis to commit a number of acts which even they wish they wouldn't have to engage in, such as launching attacks at criminals that result in deaths of innocents.

Of course if you believe that all Palestinians are guilty because they don't constantly rat out the criminals amongst them, then you are free to live with that delusion.

The fact that I don't agree with everything Israel has done up to this point leads people like you to immediately think that I am a big supporter of Islam and Palestine, but that is not the case.

It is just another example of the race-baiting that passes for debate on these threads on FR.

11 posted on 02/29/2008 10:05:30 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
It is just another example of the race-baiting that passes for debate on these threads on FR.

These are not questions of race, but of values. Shouldn't it seem perplexing that the continuing mention of race herein is yours alone?

12 posted on 02/29/2008 10:11:56 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
I'm not that happy with the term either. It is more like "semitism-baitng". Basically what the ADL does. And what you seem to like to do.

Not particularly helpful, except to win debating points around here.

13 posted on 02/29/2008 11:27:21 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
So you say.

I like your handle though, from Hamlet.

14 posted on 02/29/2008 1:45:53 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson